Member · Former member
Péter MAGYAR
EPP · Hungary · left on 8 May 2026
Record
The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.
Roll-call participation ⓘ
18.4 %
90 of 490 final votes while in office
EPP median: 90.6 % (−72.2 pts)
Chamber median: 90.6 %
With majority line ⓘ
67.8 %
61 of 90 votes where their group had a line
EPP median: 95.6 % (−27.8 pts)
5 opposite (for ↔ against), 15 abstained against the line
Data as a table
| Figure | Participation |
|---|---|
| Péter MAGYAR | 18.4 % |
| EPP median | 90.6 % |
| Lowest in the group | 18.4 % |
| Highest in the group | 99.8 % |
| Members | 192 |
Data as a table
| Figure | With majority line |
|---|---|
| Péter MAGYAR | 67.8 % |
| EPP median | 95.6 % |
| Lowest in the group | 67.8 % |
| Highest in the group | 99.0 % |
| Members | 192 |
- Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
- “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
- A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.
Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.
| Date | Decision and vote | Result | Position | Majority line |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Feb 2026 | Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 | 211 for, 358 against, 3 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Separate vote on paragraph 3 | 253 for, 321 against, 6 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 385 for, 141 against, 53 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 10, adding text after recital AG | 265 for, 273 against, 42 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital O — part 2 | 269 for, 302 against, 5 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital O — part 1 | 397 for, 133 against, 49 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital D — part 2 | 220 for, 319 against, 39 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital D — part 1 | 426 for, 72 against, 82 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Separate vote on paragraph 65 | 253 for, 320 against, 8 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Separate vote on paragraph 64 | 253 for, 317 against, 9 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 63 | 261 for, 266 against, 51 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 55 | 491 for, 13 against, 74 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 7 to paragraph 50 | 309 for, 236 against, 28 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 48 | 421 for, 74 against, 83 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 47 | 291 for, 238 against, 50 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 46 | 251 for, 309 against, 20 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 35 | 400 for, 111 against, 67 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 6 to paragraph 31 | 284 for, 281 against, 17 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Paragraph 22 — part 2 | 276 for, 262 against, 36 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Paragraph 22 — part 1 | 377 for, 166 against, 35 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Separate vote on paragraph 17 | 247 for, 291 against, 43 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Separate vote on paragraph 16 | 245 for, 332 against, 5 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Paragraph 4 — part 2 | 274 for, 298 against, 10 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Paragraph 4 — part 1 | 410 for, 119 against, 53 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Separate vote on paragraph 2 | 294 for, 282 against, 6 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 1 | 157 for, 411 against, 14 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Cooperation among enforcement authorities regarding unfair trading practices in the agri-food supply chain Final vote on the provisional agreement | Passed 555 for, 0 against, 26 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Targeted expulsions of foreign journalists and foreign Christians in Türkiye under national security pretexts Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 502 for, 2 against, 59 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Targeted expulsions of foreign journalists and foreign Christians in Türkiye under national security pretexts Amendment 3 to recital D | 175 for, 377 against, 16 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 524 for, 3 against, 41 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran Amendment 5, adding text after recital F | 257 for, 275 against, 36 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran Amendment 1, adding text after recital D | 423 for, 120 against, 29 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 10 | 249 for, 295 against, 26 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran Amendment 4 to paragraph 10 | 193 for, 348 against, 25 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran Amendment 2 to paragraph 10 | 250 for, 290 against, 27 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran Amendment 6 to paragraph 1 | 299 for, 244 against, 15 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Post-election situation in Uganda and threats against opposition leader Bobi Wine Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 514 for, 3 against, 56 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Post-election situation in Uganda and threats against opposition leader Bobi Wine Paragraph 5 — part 2 | 418 for, 89 against, 66 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Post-election situation in Uganda and threats against opposition leader Bobi Wine Amendment 1 to paragraph 5 | 155 for, 391 against, 14 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Genetically modified cotton T304-40 Final vote on the motion for a resolution | Objection passed 428 for, 156 against, 22 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 Final vote on the motion for a resolution | Objection passed 463 for, 164 against, 21 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Genetically modified maize T25 (ACS-ZMØØ3-2) Final vote on the motion for a resolution | Objection passed 462 for, 169 against, 22 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Genetically modified soybean DBN-09004-6 Final vote on the motion for a resolution | Objection passed 461 for, 169 against, 22 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 11 Feb 2026 | EU strategic defence and security partnerships Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 440 for, 119 against, 85 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Interim report in view of the consent procedure on the Agreement establishing an association between the EU and the Principality of Andorra and the Republic of San Marino Final vote — text as a whole | Interim report adopted 552 for, 24 against, 75 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Interim report in view of the consent procedure on the Agreement establishing an association between the EU and the Principality of Andorra and the Republic of San Marino Amendment 5 to paragraph 29 | 170 for, 472 against, 7 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Interim report in view of the consent procedure on the Agreement establishing an association between the EU and the Principality of Andorra and the Republic of San Marino Amendment 4 to paragraph 26 | 89 for, 547 against, 11 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Interim report in view of the consent procedure on the Agreement establishing an association between the EU and the Principality of Andorra and the Republic of San Marino Amendment 3 to paragraph 15 | 89 for, 553 against, 8 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Amending the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027 Final vote | Consent given 490 for, 130 against, 32 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2025/006 BE/Audi – Belgium Final vote — text as a whole | Passed 593 for, 55 against, 9 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
Roll-call participation
One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.
"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
Data as a table
Voting neighbours
Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.
Work
Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.
Dossiers
No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.
Topics they work on (model-assigned)
- Justice, rule of law & rights 2
- EU budget & funds 1
- Defence & security 1
- Digital, AI & data 1
- Foreign affairs 1
Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.
In the chamber
Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.
15 contributions recorded; 25 minutes of speaking time.
Questions and motions, 1
Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.
| Date | Title | Kind | Answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Feb 2026 | Request for an assessment of land confiscation practices and of the criminalisation of public criticism of historical legislation in Slovakia P-10-2026-000603 | Priority written questionwith 6 co-authors | 30 Apr 2026 |
Amendments tabled in committee, 0
Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.
No committee amendment by this member found this term.
Connections
Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.
Political group
- Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism
National delegation
- Delegation Hungary National delegation
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 28 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Péter MAGYAR”. Member record. memberId 256868. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256868?page=23&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 28 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256868. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256868?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256868,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Péter MAGYAR}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256868?page=23&scope=final&vscope=all}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256868?page=23&scope=final&vscope=all},
urldate = {2026-09-28},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Member record. memberId 256868. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256868. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}