Skip to content

Decision

Cooperation among enforcement authorities regarding unfair trading practices in the agri-food supply chain

Effect
Passed
Result
555 for · 0 against · 26 abstained roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:19
Kind
New EU law · 1st reading
More facts (8)
Margin
by an overwhelming majority
Source
Committee report by Stefano Bonaccini
Topics
Agriculture, food & fisheriesEconomy & single market Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
184110
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 555 for, 0 against, 26 abstained (roll call).

Passed by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR and Patriots; ESN mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 110Against 0Abst. 0No vote 26 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 143Against 0Abst. 1No vote 43 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 60Against 0Abst. 3No vote 16 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 68Against 0Abst. 2No vote 14 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ESNFor 8Against 0Abst. 17No vote 2 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.52
No groupFor 22Against 0Abst. 3No vote 7 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 14

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria150051.00
Belgium180041.00
Bulgaria120140.88
Cyprus5001—
Czechia190021.00
Germany64015170.72
Denmark150001.00
Estonia7000—
Spain520081.00
Finland110041.00
France6300181.00
Greece150240.82
Croatia110011.00
Hungary1000111.00
Ireland120021.00
Italy5600201.00
Lithuania8003—
Luxembourg6000—
Latvia7002—
Malta5001—
Netherlands290021.00
Poland440270.93
Portugal170041.00
Romania230190.94
Sweden150330.75
Slovenia8001—
Slovakia80250.70

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 581 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Daniel BUDA RomaniaEPPSpeeches312 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
João OLIVEIRA PortugalThe LeftSpeeches312 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Gilles PENNELLE FrancePatriotsSpeeches212 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Petras GRAŽULIS LithuaniaESNSpeeches212 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN SpainPatriotsSpeeches212 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Stefano BONACCINI ItalyS&DSpeeches212 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Show the other 35 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Georgiana TEODORESCU RomaniaECRSpeeches212 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Barry COWEN IrelandRenewSpeeches212 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Christel SCHALDEMOSE DenmarkS&DSpeeches212 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Vytenis Povilas ANDRIUKAITIS LithuaniaS&DSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Maria GRAPINI RomaniaS&DSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Krzysztof HETMAN PolandEPPSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Luke Ming FLANAGAN IrelandThe LeftSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Thomas WAITZ AustriaGreensSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Tilly METZ LuxembourgGreensSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Tomislav SOKOL CroatiaEPPSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Jérémy DECERLE FranceRenewSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Asger CHRISTENSEN DenmarkRenewSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Raffaele STANCANELLI ItalyPatriotsSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Katri KULMUNI FinlandRenewSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Salvatore DE MEO ItalyEPPSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Emma WIESNER SwedenRenewSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECRSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sakis ARNAOUTOGLOU GreeceS&DSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Eric SARGIACOMO FranceS&DSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Céline IMART FranceEPPSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Arno BAUSEMER GermanyESNSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Abstained
Sebastian EVERDING GermanyThe LeftSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Carmen CRESPO DÍAZ SpainEPPSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Adnan DIBRANI SwedenS&DSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Antonella SBERNA ItalyECRSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Cristina GUARDA ItalyGreensSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Annalisa CORRADO ItalyS&DSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Nina CARBERRY IrelandEPPSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Marko VEŠLIGAJ CroatiaS&DSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Csaba DÖMÖTÖR HungaryPatriotsSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Tomáš KUBÍN CzechiaPatriotsSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sergio BERLATO ItalyECRSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Seán KELLY IrelandEPPSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Waldemar TOMASZEWSKI LithuaniaECRSpeeches112 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Katarina BARLEY GermanyS&DSpeeches111 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote on the provisional agreement A10-0153/2025 – Stefano Bonaccini – Provisional agreement – Am 85 Roll call555 for, 0 against, 26 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0153

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted its position on a proposed EU law to strengthen cooperation among national enforcement authorities in cross-border cases of unfair trading practices in the agri-food supply chain.

The law would give authorities new tools to gather information, find infringements, and impose fines on buyers in other member states.

Parliament asks the Commission to refer the matter back if it substantially amends its proposal.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament's amended version of the proposed regulation on cooperation among enforcement authorities for Directive (EU) 2019/633 on unfair trading practices in the agri-food chain. It sets rules for mutual assistance, alerts, coordinated actions, and introduces an EU Responsible Person for buyers outside the Union.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/0318(COD) · Ordinary legislative procedure

Cooperation among enforcement authorities responsible for the enforcement of Directive (EU) 2019/633 on unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the agricultural and food supply chain

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 20 March 2026 and now EU law.

Show the 6 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 20 January 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 15 July 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 30 July 2025 (done)
  4. Negotiations with the Council · Trilogue 12 November 2025 (done)
  5. Plenary vote · Adopted 12 February 2026 (done)
  6. Published as law · 20 March 2026 (done)

Lead committee: AGRI · Rapporteur: Stefano BONACCINI (S&D)

Other decisions on this dossier

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 2 connections: Other decisions on this dossier · Other decisions of the part-session on AGRI dossiers

Other decisions on this dossier

See all: Other decisions on this dossier

Other decisions of the part-session on AGRI dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on AGRI dossiers

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Cooperation among enforcement authorities regarding unfair trading practices in the agri-food supply chain”. Decision, 12 February 2026. votingId 184110, document A-10-2025-0153, reference 2024/0318(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-12/1 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-02-12-1,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Cooperation among enforcement authorities regarding unfair trading practices in the agri-food supply chain}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-12/1}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-12/1},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 184110, document A-10-2025-0153, reference 2024/0318(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}