Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Sitting · Plenary

Thursday 10 July 2025

Date
Thursday 10 July 2025
Part-session
7–10 July 2025 Mon 7Tue 8Wed 9Thu 10
Decisions
7 decisions: 6 passed, 1 did not pass
Votes
88 votes · 37 roll calls
More facts (5)
Voting time
13:03–13:18
Closest result
Motion of censure on the Commission (175 for, 360 against)
Amendments
26
Previous sitting
Wednesday 9 July 2025
Next sitting
Monday 8 September 2025
More
Cite this page Results of votes (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Decisions, 7

Export

Numbered as on the sitting’s record, by kind of decision.

Effect: what the decision did. Final vote: for–against–abstained and how it was recorded. Votes: votes taken on the decision (amendments, split parts, the final vote).
No.DecisionKindEffectFinal voteVotes
No.1 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies Committee report by Antonio DecaroKindNew laws · 1st readingPassed542 for, 97 against, 12 abstained roll callVotes9
No.2 Motion of censure on the Commission Motion for a resolutionKindResolutionsRejected175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained roll callVotes1
No.3 Case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai Motion for a resolutionKindResolutionsAdopted511 for, 50 against, 75 abstained roll callVotes6
No.4 Arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic Motion for a resolutionKindResolutionsAdopted617 for, 4 against, 18 abstained roll callVotes6
No.5 Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus Motion for a resolutionKindResolutionsAdopted625 for, 7 against, 10 abstained roll callVotes27
No.6 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Committee report by Hildegard BenteleKindResolutionsAdopted494 for, 83 against, 71 abstained roll callVotes22
No.7 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Motion for a resolutionKindResolutionsAdopted523 for, 75 against, 14 abstained roll callVotes17

All votes, 36

Export

Every vote of the day recorded by name. A decision can have many votes.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested by
10 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsFinal523 for, 75 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by Renew
10 Jul 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 14 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsAmendment157 for, 428 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Patriots
10 Jul 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 13 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsAmendment95 for, 420 against, 119 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Left
10 Jul 2025Paragraph 13 — part 2 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsSplit vote483 for, 84 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by The Left
10 Jul 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 13 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsAmendment80 for, 407 against, 151 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Left
10 Jul 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 12 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsAmendment79 for, 531 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Left
10 Jul 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 10 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsAmendment47 for, 560 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 7 %Requested by The Left
10 Jul 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsAmendment88 for, 520 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Left
10 Jul 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsAmendment63 for, 552 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Left
10 Jul 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsAmendment123 for, 390 against, 110 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Left
Show the other 26 votes of this page
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested by
10 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitivenessFinal494 for, 83 against, 71 abstained Adopted For 76 %
10 Jul 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital S Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitivenessAmendment217 for, 409 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Members
10 Jul 2025Amendment 1, adding text after citation 2 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitivenessAmendment226 for, 409 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Members
10 Jul 2025Paragraph 34 — part 2 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitivenessSplit vote566 for, 60 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 87 %Requested by Members
10 Jul 2025Paragraph 32 — part 1 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitivenessSplit vote588 for, 56 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 90 %Requested by Members
10 Jul 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 26 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitivenessAmendment200 for, 417 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Members
10 Jul 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitivenessAmendment193 for, 443 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Members
10 Jul 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 1 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitivenessAmendment192 for, 462 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Members
10 Jul 2025Final vote Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesFinal542 for, 97 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 83 %
10 Jul 2025Amendment 4, adding text after recital 2 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesAmendment143 for, 424 against, 80 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by Patriots
10 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in DamascusFinal625 for, 7 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 97 %Requested by Renew
10 Jul 2025Amendment 3, adding text after recital 2 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesAmendment220 for, 416 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriots
10 Jul 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital 2 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesAmendment210 for, 429 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriots
10 Jul 2025Amendment 1 to recital 2 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesAmendment191 for, 452 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriots
10 Jul 2025Amendment 10, adding text after recital D Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in DamascusAmendment237 for, 372 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by Patriots
10 Jul 2025Amendment 9 to recital B Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in DamascusAmendment351 for, 260 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Patriots
10 Jul 2025Amendment 8, adding text after recital A Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in DamascusAmendment232 for, 407 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by Patriots
10 Jul 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 7 — part 2 Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in DamascusAmendment256 for, 249 against, 135 abstained Adopted For 40 %Requested by Renew
10 Jul 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 7 — part 1 Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in DamascusAmendment615 for, 5 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 96 %Requested by Renew
10 Jul 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in DamascusAmendment212 for, 363 against, 71 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Greens
10 Jul 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in DamascusAmendment581 for, 16 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 92 %Requested by Renew
10 Jul 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 4 Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in DamascusAmendment364 for, 261 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by Patriots
10 Jul 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 3 Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in DamascusAmendment235 for, 357 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by Patriots
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Case of Ryan Cornelius in DubaiFinal511 for, 50 against, 75 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Renew
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African RepublicFinal617 for, 4 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 97 %Requested by Renew
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %

Open these votes in the register to filter them further.

Day brief

A short account of the day, written by AI from the decisions and their summaries.

AI: The day in brief Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted positions on battery rules and several human rights resolutions, while rejecting a censure motion against the Commission.

  • Battery due diligence rules: MEPs backed the Commission's proposal to amend EU battery due diligence obligations for economic operators, forwarding it to the Council and national parliaments. The Left and Greens opposed.
  • Motion of censure on Commission: Parliament rejected a motion calling for the Commission's resignation over transparency and accountability concerns, so the Commission stays. The Left, ECR, Patriots and ESN backed it; others opposed.
  • Ryan Cornelius case in Dubai: Parliament adopted a resolution urging EU diplomatic efforts to secure the release of British national Ryan Cornelius, detained in Dubai since 2008, and called for consular assistance. ESN opposed.
  • Joseph Figueira Martin case: MEPs demanded the immediate release of researcher Joseph Figueira Martin, arbitrarily arrested and tortured in the Central African Republic, and urged due process and consular access. All groups backed it.
  • Protection of religious minorities in Syria: Parliament condemned attacks on religious groups in Syria, urged authorities to protect all Syrians, and stressed Syria is unsafe for refugee returns. All groups supported the resolution.

Report a problem

Connections

The part-session and what the day’s decisions touch.

Other sittings of the part-session

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2025-07-10
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Sitting of Thursday 10 July 2025”. Sitting, 10 July 2025. sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-10. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2025-07-10 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-07-10/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-sitting-2025-07-10,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Sitting of Thursday 10 July 2025}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-07-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2025-07-10}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2025-07-10},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Sitting. sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-10. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}