Sitting · Plenary
Wednesday 26 November 2025
- Date
- Wednesday 26 November 2025
- Decisions
- 11 decisions: 9 passed, 2 did not pass
- Votes
- 215 votes · 106 roll calls
More facts (5)
- Voting time
- 12:07–12:52
- Amendments
- 66
- Previous sitting
- Tuesday 25 November 2025
- Next sitting
- Thursday 27 November 2025
Numbered as on the sitting’s record, by kind of decision.
| No. | Decision | Kind | Effect | Final vote | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No.1 | Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders | KindNew laws · 1st reading | Passed | 402 for, 250 against, 8 abstained roll call | Votes91 |
| No.2 | Increasing the efficiency of the EU guarantee under the InvestEU Regulation and simplifying reporting requirements Committee report by Aura Salla, Irene Tinagli | KindNew laws · 1st reading | Passed | 519 for, 65 against, 73 abstained roll call | Votes9 |
| No.3 | Collection of statistical information by the European Central Bank Committee report by Aurore Lalucq | KindNew laws · Consultation | Passed | 521 for, 110 against, 35 abstained roll call | Votes1 |
| No.4 | Draft amending budget No 3/2025: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updates Committee report by Victor Negrescu | KindBudget | Passed | 519 for, 99 against, 45 abstained roll call | Votes10 |
| No.5 | Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as regards the definition of prohibited weapons Motion for a resolution | KindObjections | Objection failed | 88 for, 388 against, 184 abstained roll call | Votes5 |
| No.6 | Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara Motion for a resolution | KindObjections | Objection failed | 359 for, 188 against, 76 abstained roll call | Votes10 |
| No.7 | 2026 budgetary procedure: joint text Committee report by Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec | KindResolutions | Adopted | 419 for, 185 against, 53 abstained roll call | Votes1 |
| No.8 | EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic Committee report by Urmas Paet | KindResolutions | Adopted | 510 for, 75 against, 80 abstained roll call | Votes25 |
| No.9 | Protection of minors online Committee report by Christel Schaldemose | KindResolutions | Adopted | 483 for, 92 against, 86 abstained roll call | Votes24 |
| No.10 | Access to finance for SMEs and scale-ups Committee report by Jorge Martín Frías | KindResolutions | Adopted | 360 for, 298 against, 8 abstained roll call | Votes2 |
| No.11 | Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Motion for a resolution | KindResolutions | Adopted | Adopted show of hands — no count | Votes37 |
Every vote of the day recorded by name. A decision can have many votes.
| Date | Vote | Kind | Result | For | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Nov 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara | Final | 359 for, 188 against, 76 abstained Rejected | For 58 % | Requested by Greens |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara | Final | 157 for, 465 against, 20 abstained Rejected | For 24 % | Requested by Greens |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Recital J — part 2 Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as regards the definition of prohibited weapons | Split vote | 269 for, 337 against, 55 abstained Rejected | For 41 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as regards the definition of prohibited weapons | Final | 88 for, 388 against, 184 abstained Rejected | For 13 % | Requested by The Left |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 2, adding text after recital E Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 182 for, 436 against, 31 abstained Rejected | For 28 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 140 for, 414 against, 99 abstained Rejected | For 21 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 15 to paragraph 33 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 94 for, 477 against, 80 abstained Rejected | For 14 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 32 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 233 for, 383 against, 36 abstained Rejected | For 36 % | Requested by ECR |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 31 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 70 for, 576 against, 5 abstained Rejected | For 11 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 31 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 89 for, 549 against, 11 abstained Rejected | For 14 % |
Show the other 40 votes of this page
| Date | Vote | Kind | Result | For | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 31 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 170 for, 399 against, 71 abstained Rejected | For 27 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 11 to paragraph 31 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 171 for, 461 against, 18 abstained Rejected | For 26 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Paragraph 25 — part 2 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Split vote | 467 for, 190 against, 10 abstained Adopted | For 70 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 19 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 234 for, 402 against, 22 abstained Rejected | For 36 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 10 to paragraph 13 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 159 for, 430 against, 59 abstained Rejected | For 25 % | Requested by ECR |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 11 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 124 for, 503 against, 21 abstained Rejected | For 19 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 173 for, 433 against, 39 abstained Rejected | For 27 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 18 to paragraph 11 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 233 for, 393 against, 28 abstained Rejected | For 36 % | Requested by ECR |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 6 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 133 for, 492 against, 22 abstained Rejected | For 21 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 95 for, 471 against, 82 abstained Rejected | For 15 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 85 for, 471 against, 93 abstained Rejected | For 13 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 155 for, 413 against, 80 abstained Rejected | For 24 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 3 to paragraph 1 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Amendment | 174 for, 458 against, 22 abstained Rejected | For 27 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material | Final | 49 for, 600 against, 16 abstained Rejected | For 7 % | Requested by The Left |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole Access to finance for SMEs and scale-ups | Final | 360 for, 298 against, 8 abstained Adopted | For 54 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 1 Access to finance for SMEs and scale-ups | Amendment | 264 for, 363 against, 39 abstained Rejected | For 40 % | Requested by Patriots |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole Protection of minors online | Final | 483 for, 92 against, 86 abstained Adopted | For 73 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Separate vote on paragraph 81 Protection of minors online | Separate vote | 618 for, 21 against, 23 abstained Adopted | For 93 % | Requested by Members |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Separate vote on paragraph 70 Protection of minors online | Separate vote | 632 for, 18 against, 16 abstained Adopted | For 95 % | Requested by Members |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Separate vote on paragraph 33 Protection of minors online | Separate vote | 576 for, 30 against, 52 abstained Adopted | For 88 % | Requested by Members |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Separate vote on paragraph 31 Protection of minors online | Separate vote | 622 for, 17 against, 28 abstained Adopted | For 93 % | Requested by Members |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 3 to paragraph 28 Protection of minors online | Amendment | 172 for, 432 against, 44 abstained Rejected | For 27 % | Requested by Members |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Paragraph 25 — part 1 Protection of minors online | Split vote | 549 for, 97 against, 20 abstained Adopted | For 82 % | Requested by Members |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Paragraph 24 — part 1 Protection of minors online | Split vote | 418 for, 228 against, 16 abstained Adopted | For 63 % | Requested by Members |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 7 to paragraph 24 Protection of minors online | Amendment | 200 for, 439 against, 15 abstained Rejected | For 31 % | Requested by ECR |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 6 to paragraph 23 Protection of minors online | Amendment | 196 for, 445 against, 10 abstained Rejected | For 30 % | Requested by ECR |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 5 to paragraph 20 Protection of minors online | Amendment | 216 for, 426 against, 17 abstained Rejected | For 33 % | Requested by ECR |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Separate vote on paragraph 18 Protection of minors online | Separate vote | 628 for, 25 against, 12 abstained Adopted | For 94 % | Requested by Members |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Paragraph 17 — part 1 Protection of minors online | Split vote | 416 for, 152 against, 92 abstained Adopted | For 63 % | Requested by Members |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 4 to paragraph 17 Protection of minors online | Amendment | 202 for, 441 against, 10 abstained Rejected | For 31 % | Requested by ECR |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Separate vote on paragraph 16 Protection of minors online | Separate vote | 632 for, 26 against, 5 abstained Adopted | For 95 % | Requested by Members |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 Protection of minors online | Amendment | 178 for, 448 against, 19 abstained Rejected | For 28 % | Requested by Members |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic | Final | 510 for, 75 against, 80 abstained Adopted | For 77 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Recital L — part 2 EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic | Split vote | 452 for, 201 against, 11 abstained Adopted | For 68 % | Requested by Patriots |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Paragraph 1, point ag — part 2 EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic | Split vote | 518 for, 109 against, 32 abstained Adopted | For 79 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Paragraph 1, point ad — part 3 EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic | Split vote | 504 for, 88 against, 64 abstained Adopted | For 77 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Paragraph 1, point ad — part 2 EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic | Split vote | 481 for, 113 against, 67 abstained Adopted | For 73 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Paragraph 1, point ad — part 1 EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic | Split vote | 563 for, 73 against, 24 abstained Adopted | For 85 % | |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point o EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic | Amendment | 131 for, 477 against, 57 abstained Rejected | For 20 % | Requested by ESN |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Amendment 3 to paragraph 1, after point e EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic | Amendment | 89 for, 523 against, 44 abstained Rejected | For 14 % | Requested by ESN |
Open these votes in the register to filter them further.
Day brief
A short account of the day, written by AI from the decisions and their summaries.
AI: The day in brief Written by AI from the official text — check the source
The European Parliament adopted new laws on deforestation, investment, and central bank statistics, and rejected objections to two Commission measures, shaping EU policy on trade, finance, and data.
- Deforestation Regulation: Parliament backed the law extending obligations for operators and traders to ensure products are deforestation-free, with EPP, ECR, Patriots, and ESN supporting and The Left, Greens, S&D, and Renew opposing.
- InvestEU guarantee efficiency: MEPs approved changes to the InvestEU Regulation to ease access to finance for small firms and cut red tape, backed by most groups except ESN, with The Left and Patriots mostly abstaining.
- ECB statistical data: Parliament endorsed updated rules for the European Central Bank's data collection, safeguarding confidentiality and aligning with EU data protection law, with Patriots and ESN opposed.
- Western Sahara origin labelling: An objection to Commission rules on labelling fruit and vegetables from Western Sahara was rejected, so the measure proceeds, despite concerns about misleading consumers.
- Prohibited weapons definition: Parliament rejected an objection to a delegated act updating the definition of prohibited weapons, allowing the Commission's measure to stand, with only The Left and ESN backing the objection.
Connections
The part-session and what the day’s decisions touch.
Other sittings of the part-session
- Sitting Monday, 24 November 2025 Plenary sitting 24 Nov 2025
- Sitting Tuesday, 25 November 2025 Plenary sitting 25 Nov 2025
- Sitting Thursday, 27 November 2025 Plenary sitting 27 Nov 2025
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official sources
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2025). “Sitting of Wednesday 26 November 2025”. Sitting, 26 November 2025. sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2025-11-26 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-26/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-sitting-2025-11-26,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Sitting of Wednesday 26 November 2025}},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-11-26},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2025-11-26}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2025-11-26},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Sitting. sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}