Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1

Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy

Vote
Amendment 1
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
157 for · 411 against · 14 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:19
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 1
Text
Report A-10-2025-0260
Dossier
2025/2095(INI)
Vote id
184759
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 157 for, 411 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 39Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 110Abst. 0No vote 26 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 63Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 2Against 138Abst. 4No vote 43 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 58Against 2Abst. 3No vote 16 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 64Against 0Abst. 6No vote 14 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 8Against 16Abst. 1No vote 7 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark010
Spain030
Finland020
France070
Greece040
Ireland030
Italy080
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 582 members

No vote recorded, 137

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 137 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Amendment 3 to recital Q Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemAmendment167 for, 405 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Renew, Membersr · shared0.96 484 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 89 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 438 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 526 voters
11 Mar 2025Amendment 1 European Social Fund Plus post-2027Amendment176 for, 468 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 544 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 29 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment188 for, 456 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 542 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 422 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 516 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAmendment179 for, 457 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by ESN, S&D, Renewr · shared0.95 539 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 27 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment187 for, 451 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 537 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 23, adding text after recital 27 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanismAmendment172 for, 405 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 484 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 69 The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment188 for, 449 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 532 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to recital E EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment185 for, 477 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 537 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184759
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 1 — Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184759, reference 2025/2095(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184759 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184759,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1 — Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184759}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184759},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184759, reference 2025/2095(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}