Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Decision · Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure

Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25

Effect
Objection passed
Result
463 for · 164 against · 21 abstained roll call
Date
11 February 2026, 12:27
Kind
Objection to a Commission measure
More facts (10)
Margin
by a large majority
Counts are for
the objection
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0109
Dossier
2026/2519(RSP)
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Agriculture, food & fisheries Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Requested by
S&D (1 roll call)
Sitting
Wednesday 11 February 2026
Final vote
184691
More
Cite this page Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page
Votes on this decision
Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 463 for, 164 against, 21 abstained (roll call).

Objection passed by a large majority.

The objection passed. For an implementing measure it is not legally binding: the Commission is asked to withdraw the measure but can still adopt it.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by Renew and EPP.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 37Against 0Abst. 8No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.73
S&DFor 118Against 0Abst. 5No vote 13 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 31Against 35Abst. 1No vote 8 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.28
EPPFor 57Against 106Abst. 6No vote 18 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
ECRFor 61Against 10Abst. 0No vote 8 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
PatriotsFor 62Against 12Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 28Against 1Abst. 1No vote 2 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 35

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria162020.83
Belgium107050.38
Bulgaria141110.81
Cyprus5100—
Czechia414120.61
Germany46308120.32
Denmark66300.10
Estonia2311—
Spain2824080.31
Finland77010.25
France711180.96
Greece210001.00
Croatia120001.00
Hungary180031.00
Ireland49010.54
Italy589090.80
Lithuania63110.40
Luxembourg6000—
Latvia7101—
Malta3201—
Netherlands1910020.48
Poland387530.64
Portugal117030.42
Romania199050.52
Sweden1011000.29
Slovenia9000—
Slovakia130021.00

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 648 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches111 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote on the motion for a resolution B10-0109/2026 – Motion for a resolution Roll call463 for, 164 against, 21 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D

Roll call requested by S&D.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2026-0109

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament objected to a Commission plan to renew the authorisation of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 for use in food, feed and other products, excluding cultivation.

The objection was adopted, so the Commission measure is blocked and the renewal cannot go ahead.

Parliament argued the draft decision exceeds the Commission's powers and is inconsistent with EU law on GMO safety.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament objects to the draft Commission implementing decision renewing the authorisation of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25, considering it exceeds implementing powers and is inconsistent with EU law.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2026/2519(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3) of the Rules of Procedure to the draft Commission Implementing Decision renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council

Parliament adopted the text on 11 February 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 11 February 2026 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: ENVI · Authors: Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN (EPP), Biljana BORZAN (S&D), Martin HÄUSLING (Greens), Anja HAZEKAMP (The Left)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 9 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-11/8
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25”. Decision, 11 February 2026. votingId 184691, document B-10-2026-0109, reference 2026/2519(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-11/8 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-11/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-decision-2026-02-11-8,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-11/8}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-11/8},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 184691, document B-10-2026-0109, reference 2026/2519(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}