Skip to content

Sitting · Plenary

Tuesday 10 March 2026

Date
Tuesday 10 March 2026
Part-session
9–12 March 2026 Mon 9Tue 10Wed 11Thu 12
Decisions
13 decisions: 12 passed, 1 without a final vote
Votes
392 votes · 207 roll calls
More facts (5)
Voting time
13:11–14:16
Amendments
109
Previous sitting
Monday 9 March 2026
More

Decisions, 13

Export

Numbered as on the sitting’s record, by kind of decision.

Effect: what the decision did. Final vote: for–against–abstained and how it was recorded. Votes: votes taken on the decision (amendments, split parts, the final vote).
No.DecisionKindEffectFinal voteVotes
No.1 Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law Committee report by Emil RadevKindNew laws · 1st readingPassed498 for, 90 against, 28 abstained roll callVotes19
No.2 Establishing an EU talent pool Committee report by Abir Al-SahlaniKindNew laws · 1st readingPassed414 for, 182 against, 21 abstained roll callVotes56
No.3 Increased efficiency of the External Action Guarantee Committee report by David McAllister, Charles GoerensKindNew laws · 1st readingPassed441 for, 105 against, 81 abstained roll callVotes6
No.4 Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029 KindNew laws · 1st readingUrgent procedure agreedAdopted show of hands — no countVotes1
No.5 European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law-Making covering 2023 and 2024 Committee report by Jörgen WarbornKindResolutionsAdopted493 for, 92 against, 44 abstained roll callVotes1
No.6 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Committee report by Borja Giménez LarrazKindResolutionsAdopted367 for, 166 against, 84 abstained roll callVotes260
No.7 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Committee report by Veronika Cifrová OstrihoňováKindResolutionsAdopted602 for, 9 against, 8 abstained roll callVotes15
No.8 Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges Committee report by Axel VossKindResolutionsAdopted460 for, 71 against, 88 abstained roll callVotes3
No.9 Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies Committee report by André Franqueira RodriguesKindResolutionsAdopted528 for, 21 against, 62 abstained roll callVotes10
No.10 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Motion for a resolutionKindResolutionsAdopted399 for, 78 against, 69 abstained roll callVotes18
No.11 Appointment of the Chairperson of the European Banking Authority KindOtherAppointment approved536 for, 50 against, 29 abstained counted, no namesVotes1
No.12 Appointment of the European Chief Prosecutor KindOtherAppointment approved435 for, 112 against, 46 abstained counted, no namesVotes1
No.13 Appointment of the Vice-President of the European Central Bank KindOtherAppointment approved460 for, 68 against, 91 abstained counted, no namesVotes1

All votes, 197

Export

Every vote of the day recorded by name. A decision can have many votes.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested by
10 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActFinal399 for, 78 against, 69 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by EPP
10 Mar 2026Amendment 7, adding text after recital A The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActAmendment118 for, 405 against, 86 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Left
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 11 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActAmendment164 for, 418 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 9 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActAmendment150 for, 423 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by The Left
10 Mar 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 8 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActAmendment171 for, 428 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 6 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActAmendment283 for, 262 against, 60 abstained Adopted For 47 %Requested by The Left
10 Mar 2026Separate vote on paragraph 6 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActSeparate vote450 for, 63 against, 96 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by The Left
10 Mar 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 4 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActAmendment97 for, 436 against, 64 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Left
10 Mar 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 4 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActAmendment123 for, 378 against, 105 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Left
10 Mar 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActAmendment162 for, 425 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriots
Show the other 40 votes of this page
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested by
10 Mar 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActAmendment161 for, 428 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 3 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActAmendment72 for, 476 against, 68 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Left
10 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesFinal528 for, 21 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 86 %
10 Mar 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital Z Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesAmendment277 for, 246 against, 90 abstained Adopted For 45 %Requested by The Left
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 18 — part 1 Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesSplit vote444 for, 153 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Members
10 Mar 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 17 Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesAmendment217 for, 306 against, 86 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Left
10 Mar 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 16 Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesAmendment247 for, 334 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by The Left
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 8 — part 2 Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economiesSplit vote455 for, 147 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by Members
10 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challengesFinal460 for, 71 against, 88 abstained Adopted For 74 %
10 Mar 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital H Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challengesAmendment174 for, 410 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 3 Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challengesAmendment159 for, 426 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Final602 for, 9 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 97 %
10 Mar 2026Amendment 6, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 426 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment186 for, 423 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 425 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment180 for, 419 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 1, adding text after citation 13 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment183 for, 421 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment176 for, 431 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESN
10 Mar 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment178 for, 435 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESN
10 Mar 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 421 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 415 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 27 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment173 for, 433 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESN
10 Mar 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 26 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment170 for, 426 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESN
10 Mar 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 12 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 417 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 10 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment173 for, 426 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESN
10 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingFinal367 for, 166 against, 84 abstained Adopted For 59 %
10 Mar 2026Amendment 23, adding text after recital S Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment132 for, 472 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ECR
10 Mar 2026Recital R — part 3 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote457 for, 138 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Recital R — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote441 for, 148 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Recital R — part 1 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote562 for, 34 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 91 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 92, adding text after recital O Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment170 for, 441 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Recital O — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote478 for, 116 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by The Left, Patriots
10 Mar 2026Recital O — part 1 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote539 for, 77 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 87 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 62 to recital O Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment132 for, 472 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by Greens
10 Mar 2026Recital N — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote443 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Recital J — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote422 for, 172 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 68 %
10 Mar 2026Recital J — part 1 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote573 for, 43 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 92 %
10 Mar 2026Amendment 90, adding text after recital H Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment178 for, 430 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriots
10 Mar 2026Amendment 7, adding text after recital F Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment106 for, 511 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Left

Open these votes in the register to filter them further.

Day brief

A short account of the day, written by AI from the decisions and their summaries.

AI: The day in brief Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The Parliament adopted positions on three new EU laws and several resolutions, covering insolvency, talent pool, external action, regulatory fitness, and housing.

  • Insolvency law harmonisation: Parliament backed a directive to make insolvency proceedings more uniform and efficient, strengthening avoidance actions and asset tracing. It was supported by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR, opposed by Patriots and ESN.
  • EU talent pool: MEPs adopted their position on a platform to match non-EU jobseekers with EU employers. Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP backed it; ECR, Patriots and ESN opposed; The Left split.
  • External Action Guarantee: Parliament approved changes to make the EU's External Action Guarantee more efficient for development loans. Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR supported; The Left and ESN opposed; Patriots mostly abstained.
  • Better law-making report: The resolution on regulatory fitness calls for proportionate, clear, evidence-based legislation and highlights AI's potential. It was backed by Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by Patriots and ESN; The Left mostly abstained.
  • Housing crisis resolution: Parliament adopted a resolution proposing solutions for affordable housing, including boosting supply and easing investments. S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR supported; The Left, Greens, Patriots and ESN opposed.

Report a problem

Connections

The part-session and what the day’s decisions touch.

Other sittings of the part-session

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Sitting of Tuesday 10 March 2026”. Sitting, 10 March 2026. sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2026-03-10 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-sitting-2026-03-10,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Sitting of Tuesday 10 March 2026}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2026-03-10}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2026-03-10},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Sitting. sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}