Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 16

Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 16
Result
245 for · 332 against · 5 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:20
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left, S&D · separate vote: Members
Official label
A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 16
Vote id
184764
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 245 for, 332 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 42 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 1Abst. 1No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 107Against 3Abst. 0No vote 26 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 36Against 25Abst. 2No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
EPPFor 5Against 137Abst. 2No vote 43 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 1Against 62Abst. 0No vote 16 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 70Abst. 0No vote 14 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 1Against 24Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 15Against 10Abst. 0No vote 7 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland200
France700
Greece400
Ireland300
Italy800
Netherlands010
Portugal200
Sweden001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 582 members

No vote recorded, 137

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 137 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Annex, paragraph 1 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote278 for, 374 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 42 %r · shared0.94 547 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 20 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote281 for, 361 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 536 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 8 — part 2 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote246 for, 318 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 575 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 3 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSeparate vote253 for, 321 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&D, Greensr · shared0.92 579 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 14 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024Separate vote258 for, 321 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 501 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 55 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote289 for, 347 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 534 voters
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 27 — part 3 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote279 for, 368 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.92 543 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 67 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote251 for, 349 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 515 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote250 for, 310 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 575 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 24 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote278 for, 371 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.91 537 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 16 — Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184764, reference 2025/2095(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184764 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184764,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 16 — Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184764}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184764},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184764, reference 2025/2095(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}