Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3, after paragraph 10

Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran

Vote
Amendment 3, after paragraph 10
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
249 for · 295 against · 26 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 15 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
RC-B10-0110/2026 – After § 10 – Am 3
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0117
Dossier
2026/2612(RSP)
Vote id
185286
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 249 for, 295 against, 26 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 44 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 1No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 101Against 3Abst. 5No vote 27 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
RenewFor 53Against 8Abst. 2No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
EPPFor 1Against 143Abst. 2No vote 41 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 1Against 59Abst. 3No vote 16 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 7Against 47Abst. 5No vote 25 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 6Against 11Abst. 7No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland200
France700
Greece400
Ireland300
Italy800
Netherlands100
Portugal100
Sweden100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 570 members

No vote recorded, 149

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 149 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 480 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 484 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 16, adding text after recital G The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 469 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 483 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 487 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 24 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote278 for, 371 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.91 527 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 67 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote251 for, 349 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 504 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point aa — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote243 for, 303 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 541 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 143 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment282 for, 360 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 518 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 20 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote281 for, 361 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 526 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 7 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/185286
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 3, after paragraph 10 — Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 185286, reference 2026/2612(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/185286 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-185286,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3, after paragraph 10 — Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/185286}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/185286},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 185286, reference 2026/2612(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}