Skip to content

Sitting · Plenary

Tuesday 20 January 2026

Date
Tuesday 20 January 2026
Part-session
19–22 January 2026 Mon 19Tue 20Wed 21Thu 22
Decisions
11 decisions: 7 passed, 1 did not pass, 3 without a final vote
Votes
181 votes · 67 roll calls
More facts (5)
Voting time
12:43–13:22
Amendments
50
Previous sitting
Monday 19 January 2026
More

Decisions, 11

Export

Numbered as on the sitting’s record, by kind of decision.

Effect: what the decision did. Final vote: for–against–abstained and how it was recorded. Votes: votes taken on the decision (amendments, split parts, the final vote).
No.DecisionKindEffectFinal voteVotes
No.1 Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Committee report by Tomislav SokolKindNew laws · 1st readingPassed503 for, 57 against, 108 abstained roll callVotes43
No.2 Amending Regulation (EU) 2024/792 establishing the Ukraine Facility KindNew laws · 1st readingUrgent procedure agreedAdopted show of hands — no countVotes1
No.3 Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the Ukraine Support Loan for 2026 and 2027 KindNew laws · 1st readingUrgent procedure agreedAdopted show of hands — no countVotes1
No.4 Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of a loan for Ukraine KindConsent · Consent procedureUrgent procedure agreedAdopted show of hands — no countVotes1
No.5Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act Delegated Regulation supplementing the review of prudential rules for the insurance and reinsurance sector (Solvency II) Motion for a resolutionKindObjectionsObjection failed129 for, 406 against, 129 abstained counted, no namesVotes1
No.6 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Committee report by René RepasiKindResolutionsAdopted492 for, 144 against, 28 abstained roll callVotes36
No.7 Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Committee report by Jana ToomKindResolutionsAdopted420 for, 207 against, 20 abstained roll callVotes53
No.8 Safeguarding and promoting financial stability amid economic uncertainties Committee report by Johan Van OvertveldtKindResolutionsAdopted491 for, 83 against, 84 abstained roll callVotes1
No.9 Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises Committee report by Leire PajínKindResolutionsAdopted444 for, 153 against, 55 abstained roll callVotes4
No.10 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Committee report by Borja Giménez LarrazKindResolutionsAdopted417 for, 234 against, 9 abstained roll callVotes21
No.11 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Motion for a resolutionKindResolutionsAdoptedAdopted show of hands — no countVotes19

All votes, 67

Export

Every vote of the day recorded by name. A decision can have many votes.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested by
20 Jan 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital G Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment499 for, 112 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by Renew
20 Jan 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital Ea Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment212 for, 421 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital Ea Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment589 for, 51 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 91 %Requested by Renew
20 Jan 2026Amendment 12 to paragraph 22 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment349 for, 287 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 14 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment543 for, 59 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by Renew
20 Jan 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 10a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment205 for, 439 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment194 for, 441 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 9a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment207 for, 431 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 7a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment347 for, 277 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 5 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment350 for, 277 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Patriots
Show the other 40 votes of this page
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested by
20 Jan 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment169 for, 440 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 3 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment202 for, 442 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesFinal417 for, 234 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 63 %
20 Jan 2026Separate vote on recital M Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesSeparate vote645 for, 8 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 97 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 1 to recital H Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesAmendment189 for, 461 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESN
20 Jan 2026Separate vote on recital G Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesSeparate vote420 for, 198 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Recital F — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesSplit vote428 for, 204 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, Patriots
20 Jan 2026Separate vote on recital C Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesSeparate vote645 for, 14 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 98 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Recital B — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesSplit vote427 for, 212 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 12 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesAmendment198 for, 441 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESN
20 Jan 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesAmendment195 for, 439 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESN
20 Jan 2026Paragraph 3 — part 3 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesSplit vote379 for, 216 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesAmendment202 for, 445 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESN
20 Jan 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesSplit vote419 for, 193 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Paragraph 2 — part 1 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesSplit vote645 for, 12 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 98 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crisesFinal444 for, 153 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 68 %
20 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 2 Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crisesSplit vote325 for, 290 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by The Left, S&D
20 Jan 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Safeguarding and promoting financial stability amid economic uncertaintiesFinal491 for, 83 against, 84 abstained Adopted For 75 %
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesFinal420 for, 207 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 65 %
20 Jan 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital F Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesAmendment207 for, 425 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESN
20 Jan 2026Amendment 3 to recital F Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesAmendment187 for, 436 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ECR
20 Jan 2026Amendment 2 to recital E Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesAmendment178 for, 454 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by ECR
20 Jan 2026Amendment 1 to recital A Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesAmendment288 for, 294 against, 63 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by ECR
20 Jan 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 10 Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesAmendment175 for, 455 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesFinal492 for, 144 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 74 %
20 Jan 2026Amendment 32, adding text after recital E The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment190 for, 450 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 31, adding text after recital C The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment193 for, 464 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by The Left, Patriots
20 Jan 2026Separate vote on citation 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesSeparate vote491 for, 139 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 30 to citation 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment199 for, 445 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 27 to paragraph 41 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment162 for, 484 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 35 to paragraph 40 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment124 for, 500 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 40 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment136 for, 487 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment191 for, 423 against, 48 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 29 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment79 for, 561 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Left
20 Jan 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 14 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment81 for, 518 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Left
20 Jan 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 14 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment78 for, 528 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Left
20 Jan 2026Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment135 for, 471 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ESN
20 Jan 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 10 — part 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment103 for, 500 against, 61 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by Patriots
20 Jan 2026Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment190 for, 454 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESN
20 Jan 2026Amendment 33 to paragraph 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment196 for, 446 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots

Open these votes in the register to filter them further.

Day brief

A short account of the day, written by AI from the decisions and their summaries.

AI: The day in brief Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted positions on new laws and resolutions covering medicines, company law, job transitions, and financial stability, while rejecting an objection to insurance rules.

  • Critical medicines supply: Parliament backed new EU rules to secure supplies of critical medicines, boost EU manufacturing, and improve member state coordination. The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, and EPP supported it; ESN opposed.
  • Solvency II insurance rules: MEPs rejected an objection to a Commission measure amending insurance and reinsurance prudential rules, so the delegated regulation stands as planned.
  • 28th Regime company law: Parliament asked the Commission to propose a voluntary EU-wide corporate form, the Societas Europaea Unificata, to help small firms scale up. Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, and ECR backed it; The Left, Patriots, and ESN opposed.
  • Just transition jobs: MEPs called for a directive to support workers and regions during green and digital shifts, promoting social dialogue and quality jobs. The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, and EPP supported it; ECR, Patriots, and ESN opposed.
  • Financial stability measures: Parliament urged completing the Banking Union and Capital Markets Union to absorb shocks, while calling for stronger supervision and crisis preparedness. Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, and ECR backed it; The Left and ESN opposed.

Report a problem

Connections

The part-session and what the day’s decisions touch.

Other sittings of the part-session

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Sitting of Tuesday 20 January 2026”. Sitting, 20 January 2026. sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2026-01-20 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-sitting-2026-01-20,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Sitting of Tuesday 20 January 2026}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2026-01-20}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2026-01-20},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Sitting. sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}