Skip to content

Member · Former member

Péter MAGYAR

EPP · Hungary · left on 8 May 2026

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Hungary
Roll-call participation
17.0 %ⓘ of 4 836 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
79.4 %ⓘ of 820 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %
More facts (4)
National party
TISZA Tisztelet és Szabadság Párt
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 8 May 2026 (left on 8 May 2026)
Against clear line
140 of 786 votesⓘ
Member id
256868
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

17.0 %

820 of 4 836 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (−73.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

79.4 %

651 of 820 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (−14.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

17.8 %

140 of 786 votes where their group had a clear line

61 opposite (for ↔ against), 79 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

10.6 %

87 of 820 votes cast

Participation 17.0 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Péter MAGYAR17.0 %
EPP median89.9 %
Lowest in the group17.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members196
With majority line 79.4 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Péter MAGYAR79.4 %
EPP median93.6 %
Lowest in the group70.2 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members196
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 4 836

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Paragraph 30 — part 1 444 for, 32 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 16 to paragraph 29 100 for, 306 against, 71 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 26 to paragraph 24 86 for, 345 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 21 — part 2 168 for, 312 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 21 — part 1 281 for, 193 against, 1 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 14 to paragraph 16 67 for, 378 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 15 137 for, 326 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 9 to paragraph 5 127 for, 321 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Paragraph 4 — part 2 386 for, 87 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2 157 for, 337 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1 286 for, 183 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Genetically modified soybean MON 87705 × MON 87708 × MON 89788 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 373 for, 150 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
8 May 2025Banking Union – annual report 2024 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 345 for, 135 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
8 May 2025Banking Union – annual report 2024 Paragraph 44 — part 2 378 for, 142 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Banking Union – annual report 2024 Amendment 9 to paragraph 35 89 for, 375 against, 83 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Banking Union – annual report 2024 Amendment 8 to paragraph 32 77 for, 382 against, 88 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Banking Union – annual report 2024 Separate vote on paragraph 25 355 for, 117 against, 69 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Banking Union – annual report 2024 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 18 267 for, 246 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Banking Union – annual report 2024 Separate vote on paragraph 17 366 for, 77 against, 94 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Banking Union – annual report 2024 Amendment 6 to paragraph 16 121 for, 372 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Banking Union – annual report 2024 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 10 134 for, 365 against, 50 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Banking Union – annual report 2024 Separate vote on paragraph 9 439 for, 48 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
8 May 2025Banking Union – annual report 2024 Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 180 for, 346 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Competition policy – annual report 2024 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 358 for, 124 against, 79 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Competition policy – annual report 2024 Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 39 113 for, 302 against, 144 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Competition policy – annual report 2024 Amendment 13 to paragraph 38 60 for, 427 against, 77 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Competition policy – annual report 2024 Paragraph 22 — part 2 507 for, 44 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Competition policy – annual report 2024 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 18 89 for, 411 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Competition policy – annual report 2024 Separate vote on paragraph 17 508 for, 30 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
8 May 2025Competition policy – annual report 2024 Amendment 11 to paragraph 14 88 for, 335 against, 128 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Competition policy – annual report 2024 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 11 94 for, 453 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Competition policy – annual report 2024 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 8 105 for, 290 against, 161 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Competition policy – annual report 2024 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 175 for, 372 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Competition policy – annual report 2024 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 3 49 for, 465 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Competition policy – annual report 2024 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 66 for, 368 against, 130 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Competition policy – annual report 2024 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 3 66 for, 477 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Suspending certain parts of Regulation (EU) 2015/478 as regards imports of Ukrainian products into the European Union Final votePassed 354 for, 147 against, 53 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Referral back to committee 427 for, 122 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Final votePassed 378 for, 173 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 278 to recital 37 58 for, 515 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 277 to recital 35 55 for, 512 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 259, adding text after recital 26 178 for, 385 against, 0 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 258, adding text after recital 23 179 for, 387 against, 0 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 257 to recital 15 180 for, 392 against, 2 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendments 275 + 298 (voted as one) to Article 20 173 for, 386 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendments 274 + 297 (voted as one) to Article 19 175 for, 386 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 294 to Article 13, paragraph 3, après le point c 63 for, 504 against, 6 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 292 to Article 13, paragraph 3, après le point c 53 for, 461 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 254 to Article 13, paragraph 3, après le point b 56 for, 512 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Screening of foreign investments in the Union Amendment 116 to Article 7, paragraph 9 369 for, 199 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 69 of 91 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Dóra DÁVID EPPHungary95 % of 788 shared89 %
Gabriella GERZSENYI EPPHungary95 % of 777 shared89 %
Eszter LAKOS EPPHungary94 % of 783 shared89 %
András Tivadar KULJA EPPHungary93 % of 682 shared89 %
Kinga KOLLÁR EPPHungary93 % of 768 shared89 %
Zoltán TARR Former memberEPPHungary91 % of 567 shared89 %
Martine KEMP EPPLuxembourg83 % of 362 shared89 %
Liudas MAŽYLIS EPPLithuania83 % of 704 shared89 %
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU EPPRomania83 % of 536 shared89 %
Krzysztof BREJZA EPPPoland82 % of 533 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia74 % of 557 shared82 %
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia74 % of 802 shared82 %
Fabienne KELLER RenewFrance74 % of 779 shared82 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia73 % of 533 shared82 %
Sigrid FRIIS RenewDenmark73 % of 341 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium73 % of 785 shared82 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania73 % of 733 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania73 % of 669 shared82 %
Anna STÜRGKH RenewAustria73 % of 794 shared82 %
Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS RenewLithuania73 % of 816 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

15 contributions recorded; 25 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
10 Jul 2025Post-2027 Common Agricultural Policy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Jul 2025EU Preparedness Union in light of the upcoming wildfire and droughts season (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2025EU framework conditions for competitive, efficient and sustainable public transport services at all levels (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2025EU framework conditions for competitive, efficient and sustainable public transport services at all levels (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
17 Jun 2025Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2025Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
7 May 2025High levels of retail food prices and their consequences for European consumers (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
6 May 2025A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence (RC-B10-0146/2025, B10-0144/2025, B10-0145/2025, B10-0146/2025, B10-0147/2025, B10-0148/2025, B10-0149/2025, B10-0150/2025, B10-0151/2025) (vote) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Jan 2025Links between organised crime and smuggling of migrants in light of the recent UN reports (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 15 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 1

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
11 Feb 2026Request for an assessment of land confiscation practices and of the criminalisation of public criticism of historical legislation in Slovakia P-10-2026-000603Priority written questionwith 6 co-authors30 Apr 2026

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

No committee amendment by this member found this term.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Hungary National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Péter MAGYAR”. Member record. memberId 256868. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256868?page=66&rows=all&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256868. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256868?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256868,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Péter MAGYAR}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256868?page=66&rows=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256868?page=66&rows=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256868. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256868. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}