Skip to content

Decision

Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market

Effect
Adopted
Result
306 for · 80 against · 57 abstained roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:52–13:57
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Economy & single market Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
40 votes · 16 roll calls · 12 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · EPP (2 split votes) · ECR (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call, 4 split votes)
Final vote
176281
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 306 for, 80 against, 57 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 12 amendments (2 adopted, 10 rejected) and 27 parts of the text voted on separately (11 adopted, 16 rejected).

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by The Left, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 22Abst. 1No vote 23 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 42Against 1Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 75Against 0Abst. 3No vote 58 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 54Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 96Against 1Abst. 4No vote 87 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 32Against 3Abst. 19No vote 26 of 80Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
PatriotsFor 2Against 32Abst. 21No vote 30 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.37
ESNFor 0Against 19Abst. 2No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 5Against 2Abst. 7No vote 15 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 12

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria80570.42
Belgium103090.65
Bulgaria73160.45
Cyprus2004—
Czechia72750.16
Germany50175240.54
Denmark30111—
Estonia6001—
Spain131244—
Finland73050.55
France28301220.26
Greece21216—
Croatia5007—
Hungary00417—
Ireland112010.77
Italy3876250.62
Lithuania7004—
Luxembourg4011—
Latvia5013—
Malta2004—
Netherlands225040.72
Poland23016140.38
Portugal100290.75
Romania1333140.53
Sweden152040.82
Slovenia5004—
Slovakia31011—

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 443 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS SpainEPPSpeeches28 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Elisabeth DIERINGER AustriaPatriotsSpeeches28 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Lukas SIEPER changed group GermanyRenewSpeeches28 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Biljana BORZAN CroatiaS&DSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Vytenis Povilas ANDRIUKAITIS LithuaniaS&DSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Javi LÓPEZ SpainS&DSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Show the other 21 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Alice KUHNKE SwedenGreensSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Alex AGIUS SALIBA MaltaS&DSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Tomislav SOKOL CroatiaEPPSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Svenja HAHN GermanyRenewSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Bogdan RZOŃCA PolandECRSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS HungaryPatriotsSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA SpainS&DSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECRSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Zala ČERNILEC TOMAŠIČ SloveniaEPPSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Klara DOSTALOVA CzechiaPatriotsSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group No vote recorded
Pierre JOUVET FranceS&DSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Dimitris TSIODRAS GreeceEPPSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ PolandEPPSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
João OLIVEIRA PortugalThe LeftSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Hanna GEDIN SwedenThe LeftSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Stefano CAVEDAGNA ItalyECRSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group No vote recorded
Regina DOHERTY IrelandEPPSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Andreas SCHWAB GermanyEPPSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Vasile DÎNCU RomaniaS&DSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Anna CAVAZZINI GermanyGreensSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA SpainEPPSpeeches18 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 40

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1 B10-0246/2025 - Après le § 2 - Am 22/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘political pressure to expand’”Roll call286 for, 183 against, 30 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR; split: EPP
2Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2 B10-0246/2025 - Après le § 2 - Am 22/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call157 for, 337 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR; split: EPP
3Paragraph 4 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls for further action in this sector to address the significant obstacles that persist, starting from setting ambitious targets in the upcoming single market strategy;’”Show of hands RejectedRequested bysplit: Patriots
Show the other 39 votesShow the other 37 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2 B10-0246/2025 - Après le § 2 - Am 22/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call157 for, 337 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR; split: EPP
3Paragraph 4 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls for further action in this sector to address the significant obstacles that persist, starting from setting ambitious targets in the upcoming single market strategy;’”Show of hands RejectedRequested bysplit: Patriots
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Paragraph 4 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Show of hands AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots
5Paragraph 4 — part 2 B10-0246/2025 - § 4/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call386 for, 87 against, 27 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots
6Amendment 9 to paragraph 5 B10-0246/2025 - § 5 - Am 9 Roll call127 for, 321 against, 40 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
7Separate vote on paragraph 7 Show of hands Rejected
8Separate vote on paragraph 8 Show of hands Rejected
9Separate vote on paragraph 11 Show of hands Rejected
10Vote on text inserted after paragraph 11 Show of hands Adopted
11Paragraph 12 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘invites the Commission to make full use of its enforcement powers;’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
12Paragraph 12 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
13Separate vote on paragraph 13 Show of hands Rejected
14Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 15 B10-0246/2025 - Après le § 15 - Am 25 Roll call137 for, 326 against, 22 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
15Amendment 14 to paragraph 16 B10-0246/2025 - § 16 - Am 14 Roll call67 for, 378 against, 36 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
16Paragraph 16 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Considers that the single market is a key tool in times of crisis if the Member States can act in a coordinated way;”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
17Paragraph 16 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “considers that the recently adopted Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Act will be crucial to ensure coordination in order to prevent shortages and ensure the smooth functioning of the single market, including the free movement of essential goods and services throughout the EU;”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
18Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 21 — part 1 B10-0246/2025 - Après le § 21 - Am 23/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘proportionate and’”Roll call281 for, 193 against, 1 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR; split: EPP
19Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 21 — part 2 B10-0246/2025 - Après le § 21 - Am 23/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call168 for, 312 against, 1 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR; split: EPP
20Amendment 26 to paragraph 24 B10-0246/2025 - § 24 - Am 26 Roll call86 for, 345 against, 51 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
21Separate vote on paragraph 28 Show of hands Rejected
22Amendment 16 to paragraph 29 B10-0246/2025 - § 29 - Am 16 Roll call100 for, 306 against, 71 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
23Separate vote on paragraph 30 Show of hands RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Greens
24Paragraph 30 — part 1 B10-0246/2025 - § 30/1 Part voted on: “Highlights the need to further combat misleading advertising and greenwashing and to strengthen the second-hand market;”Roll call444 for, 32 against, 3 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Greens
25Paragraph 30 — part 2 B10-0246/2025 - § 30/2 Part voted on: “notes, however, that restrictive sustainability rules may have a negative impact on European competitiveness;”Roll call375 for, 92 against, 6 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Greens
26Separate vote on paragraph 34 Show of hands RejectedRequested bysplit: Patriots
27Separate vote on paragraph 34 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
28Separate vote on paragraph 34 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
29Amendment 24 to paragraph 35 B10-0246/2025 - § 35 - Am 24 Roll call164 for, 276 against, 22 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
30Separate vote on paragraph 36 Show of hands Rejected
31Separate vote on paragraph 37 Counted211 for, 253 against, 6 abstained Rejected
32Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 37 B10-0246/2025 - Après le § 37 - Am 27 Roll call146 for, 311 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
33Separate vote on paragraph 38 Show of hands Rejected
34Separate vote on recital A Show of hands Rejected
35Separate vote on recital B Show of hands Rejected
36Separate vote on recital C Show of hands Rejected
37Separate vote on recital D Show of hands Rejected
38Amendment 6, adding text after recital E B10-0246/2025 - Après le considérant E - Am 6 Roll call172 for, 288 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
39Separate vote on recital F Show of hands Rejected
40Final vote — text as a whole B10-0246/2025 - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) Roll call306 for, 80 against, 57 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots

Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens, ECR, Patriots · split votes by Greens, EPP (2), Patriots (4).

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2025-0246

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on old challenges and new commercial practices in the EU internal market, covering issues like digital platforms, e-commerce, and product safety.

The text reaffirms the single market's importance and calls on the Commission and member states to remove unjustified obstacles to free movement of goods and services while ensuring high consumer protection.

It also urges simplification of EU rules and reduction of administrative burdens, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises, and asks for updates to product legislation frameworks.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution addresses old and new challenges in the EU single market, calling for reforms to boost competitiveness, reduce administrative burdens, and improve enforcement.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2542(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Parliament adopted the text on 8 May 2025. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 8 May 2025 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: IMCO · Author: Anna CAVAZZINI (Greens)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 11 connections: Running issue: EU competitiveness · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: EU competitiveness

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market”. Decision, 8 May 2025. votingId 176281, document B-10-2025-0246, reference 2025/2542(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-08/13 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-05-08-13,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-08/13}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-08/13},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 176281, document B-10-2025-0246, reference 2025/2542(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}