Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 16 to paragraph 29

Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market

Vote
Amendment 16 to paragraph 29
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 8 May 2025
Result
100 for · 306 against · 71 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:55
More facts (6)
Position
vote 22 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0246/2025 - § 29 - Am 16
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0246
Dossier
2025/2542(RSP)
Vote id
176271
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 100 for, 306 against, 71 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 21 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 28Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 16Against 0Abst. 67No vote 53 of 136Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.71
RenewFor 4Against 49Abst. 2No vote 20 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
EPPFor 1Against 109Abst. 0No vote 78 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 59Abst. 0No vote 21 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 62Abst. 1No vote 22 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 0No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 7Against 6Abst. 1No vote 15 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany200
Spain200
Finland200
France700
Greece100
Ireland200
Italy700
Portugal100
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 477 members

No vote recorded, 242

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 242 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment201 for, 390 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 410 voters
11 Feb 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 39 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Amendment99 for, 424 against, 121 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 434 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment167 for, 294 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 354 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 60, adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 404 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 410 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 57, adding text after recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 399 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 20 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment105 for, 430 against, 130 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 471 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment206 for, 365 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.89 403 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 93 to recital 22 Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsAmendment124 for, 398 against, 118 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 424 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 404 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176271
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 16 to paragraph 29 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 176271, reference 2025/2542(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176271 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-176271,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 16 to paragraph 29 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176271}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176271},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176271, reference 2025/2542(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}