Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 9 to paragraph 5

Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market

Vote
Amendment 9 to paragraph 5
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 8 May 2025
Result
127 for · 321 against · 40 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:52
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0246/2025 - § 5 - Am 9
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0246
Dossier
2025/2542(RSP)
Vote id
176258
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 127 for, 321 against, 40 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 26 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 5Against 39Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
S&DFor 79Against 3Abst. 2No vote 52 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
RenewFor 1Against 58Abst. 0No vote 16 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 2Against 112Abst. 0No vote 74 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 2Against 58Abst. 1No vote 19 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 0Against 27Abst. 35No vote 23 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.35
ESNFor 0Against 19Abst. 2No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 11Against 5Abst. 0No vote 13 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany200
Spain200
Finland200
France700
Greece100
Ireland200
Italy600
Portugal100
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 488 members

No vote recorded, 231

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 231 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 33 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment190 for, 439 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 434 voters
14 Nov 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 4 EU actions against the Russian shadow fleets and ensuring a full enforcement of sanctions against RussiaAmendment167 for, 384 against, 78 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 440 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 173 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment162 for, 474 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 440 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 86 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment167 for, 449 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 431 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 45 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineAmendment191 for, 296 against, 143 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 425 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 10 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment188 for, 423 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 481 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 17 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment159 for, 391 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 390 voters
8 Jul 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 2 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment214 for, 438 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 465 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 46 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote182 for, 432 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.79 429 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 38 to paragraph 17 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment155 for, 402 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 392 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176258
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 9 to paragraph 5 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 176258, reference 2025/2542(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176258 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-176258,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 9 to paragraph 5 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176258}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176258},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176258, reference 2025/2542(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}