Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 25, after paragraph 15

Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market

Vote
Amendment 25, after paragraph 15
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 8 May 2025
Result
137 for · 326 against · 22 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:53
More facts (6)
Position
vote 14 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
B10-0246/2025 - Après le § 15 - Am 25
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0246
Dossier
2025/2542(RSP)
Vote id
176262
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 137 for, 326 against, 22 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 26Abst. 0No vote 19 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
GreensFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 84Abst. 0No vote 52 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 55Abst. 3No vote 17 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
EPPFor 4Against 98Abst. 12No vote 74 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
ECRFor 61Against 0Abst. 1No vote 18 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 62Against 0Abst. 0No vote 23 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 4Against 16Abst. 0No vote 7 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
No groupFor 5Against 3Abst. 6No vote 15 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium010
Germany020
Spain020
Finland110
France070
Greece010
Ireland020
Italy070
Portugal010
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 485 members

No vote recorded, 234

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 234 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 Protection of minors onlineAmendment178 for, 448 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.92 439 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 41 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Amendment175 for, 463 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 465 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 111, adding text after paragraph 10 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment183 for, 456 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 442 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Amendment 84 to Article 4, after paragraph 1 Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034Amendment168 for, 505 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 451 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in ModenaOther134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.92 302 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 114 to paragraph 22 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment178 for, 466 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 446 voters
11 Feb 2025Amendment 29 to paragraph 39 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Amendment163 for, 450 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 440 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 1, point v Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment189 for, 444 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 437 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 4 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Amendment159 for, 424 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 420 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemAmendment160 for, 404 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Renew, Membersr · shared0.91 414 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176262
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 25, after paragraph 15 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 176262, reference 2025/2542(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176262 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-176262,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 25, after paragraph 15 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176262}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176262},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176262, reference 2025/2542(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}