Skip to content

Member

Krzysztof BREJZA

EPP · Poland

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Poland
Roll-call participation
91.8 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
91.0 %ⓘ of 569 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
KO Koalicja Obywatelska
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
17 of 529 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET (substitute), LIBE
Member id
251324
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

91.8 %

569 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (+1.2 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

91.0 %

518 of 569 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (−4.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

3.2 %

17 of 529 votes where their group had a clear line

13 opposite (for ↔ against), 4 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.2 %

7 of 569 votes cast

Participation 91.8 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Krzysztof BREJZA91.8 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 91.0 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Krzysztof BREJZA91.0 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 81, adding text after paragraph 17 129 for, 499 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 27 to paragraph 17 151 for, 442 against, 83 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 16 194 for, 387 against, 90 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 61, adding text after paragraph 15 131 for, 513 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 15 225 for, 439 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 14 318 for, 246 against, 114 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 14 155 for, 437 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 13 to paragraph 14 139 for, 443 against, 96 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 206 for, 457 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 12 195 for, 466 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 12 206 for, 453 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 12 231 for, 411 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 30 to paragraph 12 328 for, 297 against, 55 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 24 to paragraph 12 221 for, 420 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 11 321 for, 318 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 11 213 for, 450 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 11 178 for, 473 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 11 210 for, 453 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 11 212 for, 448 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 11 172 for, 465 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 11 172 for, 428 against, 76 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 29 to paragraph 11 342 for, 310 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 37 to paragraph 11 151 for, 468 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 10 158 for, 475 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 7 77 for, 586 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 6 93 for, 517 against, 67 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 6 66 for, 568 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 6 100 for, 505 against, 71 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 4 193 for, 464 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 4 192 for, 456 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 4 116 for, 520 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 3 210 for, 434 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 3 218 for, 425 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 2 188 for, 443 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 1 181 for, 442 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 6, adding text before paragraph 1 68 for, 475 against, 110 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 4, adding text before paragraph 1 63 for, 507 against, 70 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 3, adding text before paragraph 1 84 for, 467 against, 69 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
1 Apr 2025Customs duties on imports of certain products originating in the USA Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 593 for, 7 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
1 Apr 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Final votePassed 452 for, 182 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
1 Apr 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Amendment 33, adding text after recital 28 232 for, 389 against, 49 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
1 Apr 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Amendment 42 to recital 28 327 for, 311 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
1 Apr 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Amendment 41 to recital 22 302 for, 335 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
1 Apr 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Amendment 29, adding text after recital 6 254 for, 377 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
1 Apr 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Amendment 38 to recital 6 220 for, 409 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
1 Apr 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Amendment 40 to recital 5 312 for, 262 against, 100 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
1 Apr 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Amendment 39 to recital 3 327 for, 247 against, 102 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
1 Apr 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Amendment 49 to Article 4, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1, point c 321 for, 309 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
1 Apr 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Amendment 37 to Article 4, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1, point b 217 for, 409 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
1 Apr 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Amendment 36 to Article 4, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1, point a 228 for, 413 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 4 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Andrzej HALICKI EPPPoland98 % of 4 974 shared89 %
Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ EPPPoland98 % of 4 970 shared89 %
Ewa KOPACZ EPPPoland98 % of 5 431 shared89 %
Mirosława NYKIEL EPPPoland97 % of 4 877 shared89 %
Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK EPPPoland97 % of 5 150 shared89 %
Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ EPPPoland97 % of 5 359 shared89 %
Andrzej BUŁA EPPPoland97 % of 5 010 shared89 %
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA EPPPoland97 % of 5 233 shared89 %
Dariusz JOŃSKI EPPPoland97 % of 5 398 shared89 %
Łukasz KOHUT EPPPoland97 % of 5 322 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia84 % of 4 903 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania84 % of 4 822 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania84 % of 4 008 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium84 % of 5 304 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia83 % of 4 464 shared82 %
Sophie WILMÈS RenewBelgium83 % of 4 022 shared82 %
Dan NICA S&DRomania83 % of 3 388 shared75 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland83 % of 4 283 shared82 %
Jérémy DECERLE RenewFrance83 % of 2 969 shared82 %
Benoit CASSART RenewBelgium83 % of 5 008 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeSubstitute23 Oct 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202422 Oct 2024

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationLIBE31 Aug 2026
Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act)Shadow rapporteur for an opinionLIBE10 Feb 2026
-Official delegationDEPA20 Oct 2025
Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workShadow rapporteur for an opinionLIBE3 Jun 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationLIBE13 May 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationLIBE24 Apr 2025
nomination as Shadow Rapporteur for the file on the Proposal for a Council regulation on the issuance of and technical standards for digital travel credentials based on identity cards (2024/0248(CNS)).Shadow rapporteurLIBE13 Dec 2024

Show all 7 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

17 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 25 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 17 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 59

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
13 Jul 2026Missing and runaway children as an indicator of violence, abuse and grooming E-10-2026-002868Written questionwith 15 co-authorsNot yet answered
2 Jun 2026Participation of EU officials in ISS World Europe security fair E-10-2026-002240Written questionwith 29 co-authors21 Sept 2026
2 Jun 2026Application of the Early Detection and Exclusion System to companies active in the cyber-surveillance sector, including those involved in spyware E-10-2026-002239Written questionwith 30 co-authors5 Aug 2026
27 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine B-10-2026-0215Motion for a resolutionwith 30 co-authors—
24 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on supporting democratic resilience in Armenia B-10-2026-0199Motion for a resolutionwith 17 co-authors—
22 Apr 2026Potential long-term neurological effects of artificial sweeteners and the need for an updated EU risk assessment E-10-2026-001645Written question3 Jul 2026
22 Apr 2026Strengthening EU security by addressing the use of Russian SIM cards in hybrid warfare activities E-10-2026-001646Written question18 Sept 2026
9 Apr 2026Threats to media freedom in Poland: concerns over the establishment of the new TV channel Newsmax Polska E-10-2026-001458Written questionwith 1 co-author23 Jun 2026
1 Apr 2026Concerns regarding the rule of law and fundamental rights in Georgia E-10-2026-001362Written questionwith 16 co-authors5 Jun 2026
26 Mar 2026Urgent disbursement of EU financial support related to Ukraine E-10-2026-001268Written questionwith 3 co-authors29 Jul 2026

Show all 59 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 12

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
1 Jul 2026Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act) LIBE-AM-790741 LIBE6
19 Mar 20262025 Commission report on Georgia AFET-AM-786711 AFET7
12 Feb 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784405 EUDS1
12 Feb 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784406 EUDS2
12 Feb 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784407 EUDS1
12 Feb 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784408 EUDS1
12 Feb 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784367 EUDS4
23 Jul 2025Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work LIBE-AM-775762 LIBE31
5 May 2025Application for the electronic submission of travel data (“EU Digital Travel application”) and amending Regulations (EU) 2016/399 and (EU) 2018/1726 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004, as regards the use of digital travel credentials LIBE-AM-773186 LIBE16
29 Apr 20252023 and 2024 Commission reports on Georgia AFET-AM-773108 AFET12

Show all 12 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Krzysztof BREJZA”. Member record. memberId 251324. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/251324?page=100&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/251324. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/251324?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-251324,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Krzysztof BREJZA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/251324?page=100&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/251324?page=100&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 251324. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/251324. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}