Skip to content

Member

Klára DOBREV

S&D · Hungary

Group
S&D
Country
Hungary
Roll-call participation
71.1 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
94.7 %ⓘ of 4 213 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 96.3 %
More facts (5)
National party
DK Demokratikus Koalíció
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
187 of 4 144 votesⓘ
Committees
AFCO, EMPL (substitute), REGI
Member id
197579
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

71.1 %

4 214 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 89.9 % (−18.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

94.7 %

3 991 of 4 213 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 96.3 % (−1.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.5 %

187 of 4 144 votes where their group had a clear line

160 opposite (for ↔ against), 7 abstained against the line, 20 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

0.9 %

40 of 4 214 votes cast

Participation 71.1 % — S&D median 89.9 %, 138 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 138 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Klára DOBREV71.1 %
S&D median89.9 %
Lowest in the group30.4 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members138
With majority line 94.7 % — S&D median 96.3 %, 138 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 138 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Klára DOBREV94.7 %
S&D median96.3 %
Lowest in the group81.9 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members138
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 462 for, 76 against, 106 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 14, adding text after recital P 186 for, 470 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 25 to recital P 197 for, 455 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 24 to recital N 182 for, 455 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 23 to recital M 217 for, 444 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 22 to recital K 219 for, 440 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Recital H — part 2 344 for, 297 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Recital H — part 1 497 for, 136 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 39 to recital F 231 for, 412 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 38 to recital D 224 for, 411 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 21 to recital D 194 for, 458 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 31 207 for, 451 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Paragraph 31 — part 2 460 for, 149 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 33 to paragraph 31 193 for, 437 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Paragraph 28 — part 2 303 for, 299 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 19 to paragraph 27 206 for, 450 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 32 to paragraph 27 235 for, 406 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 26 376 for, 236 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 4 to paragraph 25 220 for, 373 against, 71 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 18 to paragraph 23 185 for, 475 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 22 120 for, 475 against, 79 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 13 205 for, 459 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 7 213 for, 436 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 31 to paragraph 7 122 for, 450 against, 93 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 6 173 for, 461 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 5 247 for, 409 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 29 to paragraph 5 115 for, 462 against, 91 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 235 for, 389 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 4 96 for, 389 against, 174 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 1 205 for, 447 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 419 for, 204 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 1 135 for, 468 against, 70 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 1 234 for, 421 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 8, adding text before paragraph 1 41 for, 506 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 1, adding text after recital T 78 for, 515 against, 87 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 32, adding text after recital P 118 for, 526 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 25, adding text after recital J 365 for, 234 against, 79 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 24, adding text after recital E 279 for, 301 against, 94 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 22, adding text after recital E 106 for, 524 against, 49 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 99 to recital A 494 for, 114 against, 70 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 74 61 for, 572 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 74 190 for, 444 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 19 to paragraph 74 181 for, 384 against, 112 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 73 — part 1 400 for, 216 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 76 to paragraph 71 — part 2 217 for, 422 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 76 to paragraph 71 — part 1 267 for, 280 against, 119 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 70 — part 2 363 for, 180 against, 126 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 70 — part 1 489 for, 127 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 69 303 for, 316 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 69 216 for, 438 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 36 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242321
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202422
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249291
7 Oct 202422
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241817
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129128
24 Oct 20241313
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202420
26 Nov 2024180
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245737
17 Dec 2024130
18 Dec 2024330
19 Dec 2024450
20 Jan 202520
21 Jan 202510
22 Jan 202520
23 Jan 2025450
10 Feb 202511
11 Feb 20253232
12 Feb 20251010
13 Feb 20253021
10 Mar 202520
11 Mar 202598
12 Mar 2025228226
13 Mar 20252423
31 Mar 202533
1 Apr 20253535
2 Apr 2025251247
3 Apr 20256261
5 May 202555
6 May 20251010
7 May 2025220129
8 May 20251030
21 May 202520
22 May 20255353
16 Jun 202520
17 Jun 20254141
18 Jun 20259189
19 Jun 20258787
7 Jul 202510
8 Jul 2025550
9 Jul 2025134133
10 Jul 20253635
8 Sept 202511
9 Sept 2025101100
10 Sept 20253434
11 Sept 2025690
6 Oct 202520
7 Oct 202550
8 Oct 2025550
9 Oct 2025650
20 Oct 202530
21 Oct 2025130
22 Oct 20251860
23 Oct 2025550
13 Nov 2025267259
24 Nov 202533
25 Nov 20257575
26 Nov 202510099
27 Nov 2025125122
15 Dec 202544
16 Dec 20256666
17 Dec 20254342
18 Dec 2025420
20 Jan 20266767
21 Jan 2026112105
22 Jan 20265834
9 Feb 202620
10 Feb 20263838
11 Feb 20261313
12 Feb 20261410
24 Feb 2026430
9 Mar 202610
10 Mar 2026197189
11 Mar 20266059
12 Mar 2026340
25 Mar 202630
26 Mar 2026690
27 Apr 202622
28 Apr 2026225223
29 Apr 2026296289
30 Apr 20266867
18 May 202643
19 May 202633
20 May 20269691
21 May 20269883
15 Jun 202622
16 Jun 20264040
17 Jun 20261270
18 Jun 2026770
6 Jul 202622
7 Jul 20267272
8 Jul 2026144141
9 Jul 20266757
14 Sept 202610
15 Sept 20261550
16 Sept 20268077
17 Sept 2026124123

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Csaba MOLNÁR S&DHungary99 % of 3 938 shared93 %
Bruno TOBBACK S&DBelgium95 % of 4 085 shared93 %
Marc ANGEL S&DLuxembourg95 % of 4 164 shared93 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany95 % of 3 517 shared93 %
Birgit SIPPEL S&DGermany94 % of 3 513 shared93 %
Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group S&DGreece94 % of 540 shared93 %
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA S&DSpain94 % of 2 775 shared93 %
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ S&DSpain94 % of 4 073 shared93 %
Lina GÁLVEZ S&DSpain94 % of 3 614 shared93 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany94 % of 3 235 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jana TOOM RenewEstonia89 % of 3 602 shared86 %
Lukas SIEPER changed group RenewGermany88 % of 4 082 shared49 %
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE RenewBelgium88 % of 3 185 shared86 %
Pascal CANFIN RenewFrance88 % of 3 956 shared86 %
Charles GOERENS RenewLuxembourg88 % of 3 858 shared86 %
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY RenewNetherlands88 % of 4 164 shared86 %
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE RenewNetherlands88 % of 4 203 shared86 %
Lucia YAR RenewSlovakia88 % of 4 196 shared86 %
Valérie HAYER RenewFrance88 % of 4 172 shared86 %
Ľudovít ÓDOR RenewSlovakia87 % of 3 940 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeVice-chair3 Oct 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on the Future of Education and Skills for a Competitive EuropeIG10-14 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Trade UnionsIG10-24 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeMember19 Sept 20242 Oct 2024

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesShadow rapporteurEMPL15 Jul 2026
No dossier namedOpinion rapporteurEMPL9 Dec 2025
Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesShadow rapporteurEMPL3 Jul 2025
Stock-taking of the European elections 2024Shadow rapporteurAFCO29 Apr 2025
The role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transitionShadow rapporteur for an opinionEMPL21 Mar 2025
Stock-taking of the European elections 2024Shadow rapporteurAFCO21 Feb 2025
I will participate in an ad hoc AFCO delegation to Washington, DC between 19th and 22ndof November.Official delegation12 Nov 2024
I am submitting this declaration on awareness of conflicts of interest (DACI) to duly fulfill the requirements for the shadow rapporteurship for the \"\"Possibilities for simplification of cohesion funds\"\" REGI file.Shadow rapporteurREGI22 Oct 2024
I am filling this declaration for the appointment as shadow rapporteur on the Multiannual Financial Framework post-2027: ‘A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world.Shadow rapporteurEMPL2 Oct 2024
I am submitting this declaration for the appointment as shadow rapporteur on 2023 Discharge (Commission & Decentralised agencies).Shadow rapporteurEMPL2 Oct 2024

Show all 12 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

24 contributions recorded, 5 written statements; 6 on behalf of their group; 34 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 24 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 12

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
5 Jun 2026Alleged forced labour at the BYD construction site in Szeged, Hungary: follow-up E-10-2026-002325Written questionwith 2 co-authors22 Jul 2026
8 Apr 2026Alleged forced labour at the BYD construction site in Szeged (Hungary) E-10-2026-001437Written questionwith 2 co-authors27 May 2026
4 Aug 2025Strengthening the role of local and regional authorities in upholding the rule of law in the EU E-10-2025-003175Written questionwith 27 co-authors2 Oct 2025
4 Jul 2025The abuse of state advertising for political influence and enforcement of the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) E-10-2025-002736Written questionwith 23 co-authors28 Aug 2025
16 Jun 2025Protection of Hungarian citizens’ fundamental rights in the context of biometric identification and surveillance at public gatherings E-10-2025-002415Written questionwith 59 co-authors1 Aug 2025
23 Apr 2025Acquisition of X by Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence start-up xAI E-10-2025-001615Written questionwith 42 co-authors14 Jul 2025
19 Mar 2025Seizing the Russian shadow fleet in the Baltic Sea: the Commission’s measures to prevent vessel sales E-10-2025-001174Written questionwith 60 co-authors29 Jul 2025
17 Jan 2025Actual or foreseeable negative effects of Elon Musk’s statements on civic discourse, electoral processes and freedom and pluralism of the media under the DSA E-10-2025-000191Written questionwith 47 co-authors5 Mar 2025
9 Dec 2024The spread of disinformation by recommender systems and other automated mechanisms as a systemic risk under the Digital Services Act E-10-2024-002826Written questionwith 39 co-authors19 Feb 2025
5 Dec 2024The role of TikTok in the Romanian presidential election E-10-2024-002794Written questionwith 36 co-authors11 Feb 2025
17 Sept 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate change B-10-2024-0061Motion for a resolutionwith 7 co-authors—

Amendments tabled in committee, 37

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 37 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Hungary National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Klára DOBREV”. Member record. memberId 197579. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197579?docs=all&page=102&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197579. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197579?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197579,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Klára DOBREV}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197579?docs=all&page=102&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197579?docs=all&page=102&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197579. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197579. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}