Skip to content

Member

Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ

EPP · Poland

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Poland
Roll-call participation
94.5 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
95.9 %ⓘ of 586 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
KO Koalicja Obywatelska
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
14 of 547 votesⓘ
Committees
ENVI, PECH (substitute), SANT
Member id
197492
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

94.5 %

586 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (+4.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

95.9 %

562 of 586 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (+0.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.6 %

14 of 547 votes where their group had a clear line

10 opposite (for ↔ against), 4 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.0 %

6 of 586 votes cast

Participation 94.5 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ94.5 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 95.9 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ95.9 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Recital G — part 2 149 for, 331 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Recital G — part 1 495 for, 23 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital F 517 for, 10 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital E 489 for, 28 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital D 510 for, 7 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital C 497 for, 30 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Recital B — part 2 341 for, 180 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Recital B — part 1 484 for, 34 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital A 491 for, 28 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 25 81 for, 397 against, 69 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 25 62 for, 418 against, 68 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 25 85 for, 413 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 25 84 for, 416 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Paragraph 9 — part 3 408 for, 96 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Paragraph 9 — part 2 357 for, 144 against, 49 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Paragraph 9 — part 1 319 for, 190 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on paragraph 2 503 for, 12 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on paragraph 1 522 for, 4 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 9 to paragraph 19 169 for, 389 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 15 167 for, 363 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 15 176 for, 249 against, 140 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Paragraph 15 — part 2 409 for, 144 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 372 for, 139 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Paragraph 14 — part 3 402 for, 135 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Paragraph 14 — part 2 262 for, 291 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Paragraph 14 — part 1 509 for, 48 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 283 for, 199 against, 85 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 14, adding text after recital F 217 for, 319 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 6 to paragraph 14 181 for, 379 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Separate vote on paragraph 3 431 for, 58 against, 78 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 13, adding text after recital A 238 for, 315 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 23 to paragraph 5 166 for, 394 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 4 215 for, 313 against, 38 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 4 248 for, 279 against, 38 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 4 267 for, 245 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 4 264 for, 289 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 4 213 for, 324 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 1 202 for, 330 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 206 for, 319 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 195 for, 353 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 202 for, 329 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 112 for, 330 against, 124 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 185 for, 334 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 22 to paragraph 1 177 for, 381 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 294 for, 245 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 6, adding text after recital Q 288 for, 263 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 5, adding text after recital M 302 for, 256 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 4, adding text after recital M 291 for, 269 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 10 to paragraph 13 282 for, 276 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 8 to paragraph 8 282 for, 274 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Dariusz JOŃSKI EPPPoland98 % of 5 535 shared89 %
Ewa KOPACZ EPPPoland97 % of 5 594 shared89 %
Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ EPPPoland97 % of 5 522 shared89 %
Krzysztof BREJZA EPPPoland96 % of 5 251 shared89 %
Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK EPPPoland96 % of 5 298 shared89 %
Michał SZCZERBA EPPPoland96 % of 5 519 shared89 %
Mirosława NYKIEL EPPPoland96 % of 5 048 shared89 %
Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ EPPPoland96 % of 5 142 shared89 %
Andrzej BUŁA EPPPoland96 % of 5 181 shared89 %
Łukasz KOHUT EPPPoland96 % of 5 482 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia84 % of 5 083 shared82 %
Sophie WILMÈS RenewBelgium83 % of 3 892 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania83 % of 4 963 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium83 % of 5 474 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland83 % of 4 468 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania82 % of 4 081 shared82 %
Benoit CASSART RenewBelgium82 % of 5 179 shared82 %
Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON RenewFinland82 % of 5 023 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia82 % of 4 323 shared82 %
Elsi KATAINEN RenewFinland82 % of 5 543 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeMember20 Jan 2025now
Committee on FisheriesPECH CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Public HealthSANT CommitteeMember23 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the countries of South AsiaDSAS DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeMember19 Jul 202419 Jan 2025
Subcommittee on Public HealthSANT SubcommitteeMember19 Jul 202419 Jan 2025

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Europe’s Beating Cancer PlanShadow rapporteurSANT30 Mar 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationSANT24 Mar 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationSANT14 Aug 2025

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

6 contributions recorded, 1 written statement; 8 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
17 Sept 2026An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Jul 2026Evaluation of the common fisheries policy and follow-up (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Feb 2026World Cancer Day (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
9 Oct 2025World Mental Health Day - addressing the socio-economic factors (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Oct 2024World Mental Health Day - need for a comprehensive EU strategy on mental health (debate) StatementRead
18 Sept 2024The devastating floods in Central and Eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate change (debate) Speech · 2 minRead

Show all 6 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 9

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
24 Jun 2026Timeline and scope of the forthcoming simplification package on fisheries legislation to support the competitiveness of the EU fleet E-10-2026-002596Written questionwith 13 co-authors20 Aug 2026
7 May 2026The future of support for Fisheries Local Action Groups under the EU’s multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 P-10-2026-001900Priority written question10 Jun 2026
9 Feb 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on World Cancer Day B-10-2026-0141Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors—
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0060Motion for a resolutionwith 143 co-authors—
22 Jul 2025Reassessing the timetable and safeguards for ETS2: preventing price shocks and ensuring social readiness E-10-2025-003032Written questionwith 48 co-authors12 Nov 2025
21 Feb 2025Commission’s response to the incomplete implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Member States E-10-2025-000810Written questionwith 50 co-authors27 May 2025
16 Oct 2024Fund for the protection and development of the frontier regions of countries bordering Ukraine, Belarus and Russia E-10-2024-002090Written questionwith 36 co-authors10 Jan 2025
2 Oct 2024Shortages of critical medicines in Europe P-10-2024-001924Priority written question12 Nov 2024
17 Sept 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate change B-10-2024-0057Motion for a resolutionwith 24 co-authors—

Show all 9 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 5

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 5 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 496d6a1f1bc3 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ”. Member record. memberId 197492. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197492?page=14&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197492. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197492?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 496d6a1f1bc3 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197492,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197492?page=14&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197492?page=14&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197492. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197492. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 496d6a1f1bc3 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}