Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 5 — part 2

Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers

Vote
Paragraph 5 — part 2
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
512 for · 86 against · 8 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:33
More facts (6)
Position
vote 12 of 21 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: Greens
Official label
B10-0390/2026 – § 5/2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0390
Dossier
2026/2797(RSP)
Vote id
196788
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 512 for, 86 against, 8 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 84 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 6Against 31Abst. 0No vote 7 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
GreensFor 1Against 47Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 112Against 3Abst. 0No vote 20 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 156Against 0Abst. 0No vote 28 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 8Against 5Abst. 8No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Germany100
Denmark100
Spain040
Finland030
France090
Greece100
Ireland200
Italy090
Netherlands010
Portugal110
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 606 members

No vote recorded, 111

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 111 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Final vote Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesFinal542 for, 97 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 83 %r · shared0.87 548 voters
12 Mar 2026Final vote Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Final473 for, 81 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 84 %r · shared0.87 487 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 116 + 117 + 316 + 1 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment536 for, 100 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.86 543 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in ModenaOther355 for, 86 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.85 395 voters
17 Dec 2024Final vote on the provisional agreement Deforestation Regulation: provisions relating to the date of applicationFinal546 for, 97 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 84 %r · shared0.84 545 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendments 92 + 133 (voted as one) to paragraph 2 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment564 for, 97 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.83 556 voters
21 Jan 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of SerbiaFinal505 for, 90 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.82 536 voters
21 Jan 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Bosnia and HerzegovinaFinal565 for, 83 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 85 %r · shared0.82 554 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendments 60 + 91 + 132 (voted as one) to Annex II; Annex III – introductory part Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment565 for, 92 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.82 555 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendments 82 + 122 (voted as one) to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment556 for, 102 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.82 558 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196788
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 5 — part 2 — Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196788, reference 2026/2797(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196788 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196788,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 5 — part 2 — Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196788}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196788},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196788, reference 2026/2797(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}