Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 76, after paragraph 7

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 76, after paragraph 7
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
177 for · 418 against · 13 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:43
More facts (6)
Position
vote 42 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After § 7 – Am 76
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197119
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 7 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 1Against 47Abst. 1No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 1Against 112Abst. 2No vote 20 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 3Against 58Abst. 4No vote 13 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
EPPFor 3Against 150Abst. 0No vote 31 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 74Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 22Against 1Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 4Against 13Abst. 4No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Germany010
Denmark010
Spain040
Finland030
France090
Greece010
Ireland020
Italy090
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 608 members

No vote recorded, 109

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 109 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroAmendment153 for, 424 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 573 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 19 to recital B European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Amendment176 for, 446 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 534 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 89 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 438 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 537 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 May 2025Amendment 23, adding text after recital 27 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanismAmendment172 for, 405 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 496 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 12 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment146 for, 316 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 408 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 422 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 534 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 3 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment197 for, 465 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.94 585 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 108 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment195 for, 433 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 541 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 45 to paragraph 61 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment178 for, 463 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.93 571 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 558 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197119
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 76, after paragraph 7 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197119, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197119 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197119,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 76, after paragraph 7 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197119}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197119},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197119, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}