Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 63 to paragraph 4

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 63 to paragraph 4
Result
267 for · 332 against · 8 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:38
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – § 4 – Am 63
Vote id
197093
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 267 for, 332 against, 8 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 44 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 1Abst. 1No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 111Against 3Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 54Against 10Abst. 0No vote 14 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
EPPFor 2Against 151Abst. 1No vote 30 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 0Against 73Abst. 1No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 68Abst. 0No vote 16 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 3No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 16Against 4Abst. 2No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany100
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France900
Greece100
Ireland200
Italy900
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 607 members

No vote recorded, 110

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 110 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Recital G — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote254 for, 335 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 516 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 20 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote281 for, 361 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 551 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 67 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote251 for, 349 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 524 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point aa — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote243 for, 303 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 483 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point aa — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote251 for, 296 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 485 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 24 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote278 for, 371 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.92 551 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote293 for, 343 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.91 545 voters
8 Jul 2025Motion for adjournment of the vote Preserving the memory of the victims of the post war communist period in SloveniaOther278 for, 352 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 43 %r · shared0.91 548 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point g — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote255 for, 290 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 484 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 20 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment283 for, 358 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 553 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 63 to paragraph 4 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197093, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197093 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197093,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 63 to paragraph 4 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197093}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197093},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197093, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}