Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 45, after paragraph 1

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 45, after paragraph 1
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
427 for · 149 against · 29 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:35
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After § 1 – Am 45
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197082
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 427 for, 149 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 71 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 112Against 1Abst. 0No vote 22 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 14Against 139Abst. 0No vote 31 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 67Against 4Abst. 3No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 67Against 2Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ESNFor 3Against 2Abst. 19No vote 3 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.69
No groupFor 14Against 1Abst. 7No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany100
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France900
Greece100
Ireland200
Italy900
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 605 members

No vote recorded, 112

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 112 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Feb 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Ukraine Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – UkraineOther278 for, 121 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.81 362 voters
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on paragraph 54 Public procurementSeparate vote440 for, 201 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 535 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 39 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote475 for, 181 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.80 551 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 21 — part 1 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeAmendment393 for, 182 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.78 521 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 27 — part 1 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment410 for, 146 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.78 506 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 53 to paragraph 1, after point aa Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment379 for, 181 against, 78 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 548 voters
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on recital AA Public procurementSeparate vote415 for, 215 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.74 528 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostagesAmendment456 for, 135 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.73 518 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 Joint communication on humanitarian aidAmendment283 for, 216 against, 83 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.73 505 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital C The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAmendment374 for, 233 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 557 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197082
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 45, after paragraph 1 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197082, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197082 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197082,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 45, after paragraph 1 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197082}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197082},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197082, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}