Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 62 to paragraph 3

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 62 to paragraph 3
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
92 for · 488 against · 12 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:36
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – § 3 – Am 62
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197087
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 92 for, 488 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 16 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 2No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 9Against 99Abst. 2No vote 25 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
RenewFor 3Against 59Abst. 3No vote 13 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
EPPFor 0Against 153Abst. 0No vote 31 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 74Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 7Against 10Abst. 4No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium100
Germany100
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
Greece100
Ireland100
Italy900
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 592 members

No vote recorded, 125

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 125 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment95 for, 551 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 542 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 4 to Annex, point a Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 468 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 472 voters
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE GroupOther82 for, 357 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 18 %r · shared0.88 377 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2024Amendment 1 to recital A Setting up a Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeAmendment106 for, 533 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 527 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 8 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment101 for, 501 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 507 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 176 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment94 for, 545 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 529 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 5 to Annex, point b Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 466 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 471 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 201 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 545 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 529 voters
12 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Rejection81 for, 473 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 14 %r · shared0.87 475 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 2 to paragraph 1, after point d Setting up a Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeAmendment101 for, 533 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 526 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197087
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 62 to paragraph 3 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197087, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197087 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197087,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 62 to paragraph 3 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197087}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197087},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197087, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}