Skip to content

Member · Former member

Anders VISTISEN

Patriots · Denmark · left on 13 April 2026

Group
Patriots PfE
Country
Denmark
Roll-call participation
85.5 %ⓘ of 4 245 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
84.2 %ⓘ of 3 621 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 82.7 %
More facts (4)
National party
O Dansk Folkeparti
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 13 Apr 2026 (left on 13 April 2026)
Against clear line
263 of 2 867 votesⓘ
Member id
124875
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

85.5 %

3 631 of 4 245 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 91.1 % (−5.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

84.2 %

3 048 of 3 621 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 82.7 % (+1.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

9.2 %

263 of 2 867 votes where their group had a clear line

115 opposite (for ↔ against), 128 abstained against the line, 20 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

11.8 %

428 of 3 631 votes cast

Participation 85.5 % — Patriots median 91.1 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Anders VISTISEN85.5 %
Patriots median91.1 %
Lowest in the group44.5 %
Highest in the group99.9 %
Members89
With majority line 84.2 % — Patriots median 82.7 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Anders VISTISEN84.2 %
Patriots median82.7 %
Lowest in the group72.5 %
Highest in the group92.9 %
Members89
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 4 245

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 19 — part 1 447 for, 102 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 14 239 for, 299 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 11 210 for, 349 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 11 — part 2 254 for, 315 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 11 — part 1 491 for, 43 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 8 — part 2 246 for, 318 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 8 — part 1 470 for, 64 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 4 — part 2 250 for, 310 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 4 — part 1 467 for, 100 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 211 for, 358 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Separate vote on paragraph 3 253 for, 321 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 385 for, 141 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 10, adding text after recital AG 265 for, 273 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital O — part 2 269 for, 302 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital O — part 1 397 for, 133 against, 49 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital D — part 2 220 for, 319 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital D — part 1 426 for, 72 against, 82 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Separate vote on paragraph 65 253 for, 320 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Separate vote on paragraph 64 253 for, 317 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 63 261 for, 266 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 55 491 for, 13 against, 74 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 7 to paragraph 50 309 for, 236 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 48 421 for, 74 against, 83 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 47 291 for, 238 against, 50 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 46 251 for, 309 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 35 400 for, 111 against, 67 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 6 to paragraph 31 284 for, 281 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Paragraph 22 — part 2 276 for, 262 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Paragraph 22 — part 1 377 for, 166 against, 35 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Separate vote on paragraph 17 247 for, 291 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Separate vote on paragraph 16 245 for, 332 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Paragraph 4 — part 2 274 for, 298 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Paragraph 4 — part 1 410 for, 119 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Separate vote on paragraph 2 294 for, 282 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 1 157 for, 411 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Cooperation among enforcement authorities regarding unfair trading practices in the agri-food supply chain Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 555 for, 0 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Targeted expulsions of foreign journalists and foreign Christians in Türkiye under national security pretexts Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 502 for, 2 against, 59 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
12 Feb 2026Targeted expulsions of foreign journalists and foreign Christians in Türkiye under national security pretexts Amendment 3 to recital D 175 for, 377 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 524 for, 3 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
12 Feb 2026Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran Amendment 5, adding text after recital F 257 for, 275 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran Amendment 1, adding text after recital D 423 for, 120 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 10 249 for, 295 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran Amendment 4 to paragraph 10 193 for, 348 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran Amendment 2 to paragraph 10 250 for, 290 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran Amendment 6 to paragraph 1 299 for, 244 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Post-election situation in Uganda and threats against opposition leader Bobi Wine Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 514 for, 3 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
12 Feb 2026Post-election situation in Uganda and threats against opposition leader Bobi Wine Paragraph 5 — part 2 418 for, 89 against, 66 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Post-election situation in Uganda and threats against opposition leader Bobi Wine Amendment 1 to paragraph 5 155 for, 391 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Feb 2026Genetically modified cotton T304-40 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 428 for, 156 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Feb 2026Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 463 for, 164 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 9 of 87 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
António TÂNGER CORRÊA PatriotsPortugal89 % of 3 112 shared74 %
Vilis KRIŠTOPANS PatriotsLatvia87 % of 3 293 shared74 %
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal86 % of 3 445 shared74 %
Afroditi LATINOPOULOU PatriotsGreece86 % of 2 832 shared74 %
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland84 % of 3 155 shared74 %
Tomasz BUCZEK changed group PatriotsPoland84 % of 3 173 shared74 %
Antonín STANĚK PatriotsCzechia82 % of 1 510 shared74 %
Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE PatriotsBelgium80 % of 3 568 shared74 %
Hermann TERTSCH PatriotsSpain80 % of 2 813 shared74 %
Marie DAUCHY PatriotsFrance80 % of 2 581 shared74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance77 % of 3 106 shared68 %
Laurence TROCHU ECRFrance76 % of 3 429 shared68 %
Marion MARÉCHAL ECRFrance76 % of 2 954 shared68 %
Sarah KNAFO ESNFrance75 % of 2 592 shared70 %
Nicolas BAY ECRFrance75 % of 3 276 shared68 %
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany74 % of 2 500 shared68 %
Marc JONGEN ESNGermany73 % of 3 026 shared70 %
René AUST ESNGermany73 % of 3 259 shared70 %
Anja ARNDT ESNGermany72 % of 3 007 shared70 %
Alexander JUNGBLUTH ESNGermany72 % of 3 589 shared70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

46 contributions recorded; 5 on behalf of their group; 61 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
25 Mar 2026Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
25 Mar 2026Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Mar 2026EU enlargement strategy (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Jan 2026Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU’s need to adapt to be fit for today’s security challenges (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
21 Jan 2026Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate) Speech · 2 minRead
20 Jan 2026Territorial integrity and sovereignty of Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark: the need for a united EU response to US blackmail attempts (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
20 Jan 2026Territorial integrity and sovereignty of Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark: the need for a united EU response to US blackmail attempts (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 26

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
3 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on halting the expansion of mosques and Islamic centres in the EU B-10-2026-0154Motion for a resolutionwith 37 co-authors—
23 Feb 2026Peter Mandelson and Jeffrey Epstein E-10-2026-000742Written question10 Jun 2026
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0061Motion for a resolutionwith 101 co-authors—
14 Jan 2026MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2026-0063Motion for a resolutionwith 109 co-authors—
19 Nov 2025Protecting citizens’ right to make cash payments and ensuring financial inclusion O-10-2025-000042Oral questionwith 40 co-authorsNot yet answered
12 Nov 2025Upholding the EU institutions’ integrity in the face of networks with links to Hamas E-10-2025-004481Written questionwith 20 co-authors18 Mar 2026
14 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on declaring Antifa a terrorist organisation B-10-2025-0447Motion for a resolutionwith 79 co-authors—
12 Sept 2025MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0400Motion for a resolutionwith 84 co-authors—
4 Sept 2025Transparency of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority E-10-2025-003426Written question17 Nov 2025
1 Sept 2025Grooming expenses for European Commissioners E-10-2025-003348Written question27 Nov 2025
10 Jul 2025Requiring taxi drivers to take breaks despite proven periods of downtime without customers E-10-2025-002813Written question5 Sept 2025
7 Jul 2025The common agricultural policy enables animal cruelty E-10-2025-002757Written question18 Sept 2025
25 Jun 2025The Commission’s role in ensuring legal certainty, consistency and balance between security and investment in Member States’ FDI screening E-10-2025-002558Written question18 Aug 2025
12 Feb 2025Adoption of the ReFuelEU Aviation Act and the economic impact of mandatory minimum sustainable aviation fuel quotas in the air transport sector E-10-2025-000653Written questionwith 41 co-authors1 Apr 2025
11 Feb 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on implementing a mass return strategy to expel illegal migrants B-10-2025-0137Motion for a resolutionwith 36 co-authors—
6 Feb 2025Unknown chemical status E-10-2025-000558Written question2 Apr 2025
29 Jan 2025The Commission’s response to the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement E-10-2025-000403Written questionwith 36 co-authors24 Mar 2025
29 Jan 2025Lack of transparency, misuse of public funds and assurance of sound management in European institutions E-10-2025-000405Written questionwith 38 co-authors25 Mar 2025
2 Dec 2024VAT on artists’ rights and the EU’s requirements for Denmark E-10-2024-002722Written question28 Feb 2025
30 Nov 2024EU state aid rules and applying them to tax exemptions for non-profit bingo games E-10-2024-002706Written question10 Mar 2025
29 Nov 2024Failure to acknowledge vaccine-related harm is creating stigmatisation – urgent need for EU action to ensure research and support for those affected E-10-2024-002698Written questionNot yet answered
22 Nov 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the victory of president-elect Donald Trump B-10-2024-0185Motion for a resolutionwith 44 co-authors—
12 Nov 2024The Commission’s plans to include the revision of the outstanding proposals on animal welfare in its work plan for 2025 O-10-2024-000014Oral questionwith 37 co-authorsNot yet answered
10 Oct 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on enabling Member States to opt-out of EU migration policy B-10-2024-0119Motion for a resolutionwith 56 co-authors—
16 Sept 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela B-10-2024-0027Motion for a resolutionwith 9 co-authors—
17 Jul 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for the EU’s continuous support for Ukraine B-10-2024-0008Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—

Amendments tabled in committee, 1

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
5 Feb 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions FEMM-AM-782486 FEMM32

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Denmark National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Anders VISTISEN”. Member record. memberId 124875. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124875?docs=all&page=11&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124875. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/124875?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-124875,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Anders VISTISEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124875?docs=all&page=11&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124875?docs=all&page=11&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 124875. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124875. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}