Skip to content

Member

Terry REINTKE

Greens · Germany

Group
Greens Verts/ALE
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
92.6 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
99.3 %ⓘ of 574 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 96.4 %
More facts (5)
National party
GRÜNE. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
0 of 559 votesⓘ
Committees
CONT (substitute), SEDE (substitute)
Member id
103381
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.6 %

574 of 620 final votes while in office

Greens median: 92.3 % (+0.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

99.3 %

570 of 574 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 96.4 % (+2.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.0 %

0 of 559 votes where their group had a clear line

Abstention ⓘ

3.3 %

19 of 574 votes cast

Participation 92.6 % — Greens median 92.3 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Terry REINTKE92.6 %
Greens median92.3 %
Lowest in the group44.2 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members54
With majority line 99.3 % — Greens median 96.4 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Terry REINTKE99.3 %
Greens median96.4 %
Lowest in the group82.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members54
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Recital G — part 2 149 for, 331 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Recital G — part 1 495 for, 23 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital F 517 for, 10 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital E 489 for, 28 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital D 510 for, 7 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital C 497 for, 30 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Recital B — part 2 341 for, 180 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Recital B — part 1 484 for, 34 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital A 491 for, 28 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 25 81 for, 397 against, 69 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 25 62 for, 418 against, 68 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 25 85 for, 413 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 25 84 for, 416 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Paragraph 9 — part 3 408 for, 96 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Paragraph 9 — part 2 357 for, 144 against, 49 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Paragraph 9 — part 1 319 for, 190 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on paragraph 2 503 for, 12 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on paragraph 1 522 for, 4 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 9 to paragraph 19 169 for, 389 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 15 167 for, 363 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 15 176 for, 249 against, 140 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Paragraph 15 — part 2 409 for, 144 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 372 for, 139 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Paragraph 14 — part 3 402 for, 135 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Paragraph 14 — part 2 262 for, 291 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Paragraph 14 — part 1 509 for, 48 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 283 for, 199 against, 85 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 14, adding text after recital F 217 for, 319 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 6 to paragraph 14 181 for, 379 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Separate vote on paragraph 3 431 for, 58 against, 78 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 13, adding text after recital A 238 for, 315 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 23 to paragraph 5 166 for, 394 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 4 215 for, 313 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 4 248 for, 279 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 4 267 for, 245 against, 47 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 4 264 for, 289 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 4 213 for, 324 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 1 202 for, 330 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 206 for, 319 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 195 for, 353 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 202 for, 329 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 112 for, 330 against, 124 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 185 for, 334 against, 44 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 22 to paragraph 1 177 for, 381 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 294 for, 245 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 6, adding text after recital Q 288 for, 263 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 5, adding text after recital M 302 for, 256 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 4, adding text after recital M 291 for, 269 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 10 to paragraph 13 282 for, 276 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 8 to paragraph 8 282 for, 274 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 6 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Hannah NEUMANN GreensGermany99 % of 5 052 shared94 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands99 % of 4 355 shared94 %
Erik MARQUARDT GreensGermany99 % of 5 187 shared94 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany99 % of 5 457 shared94 %
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN GreensGermany99 % of 4 999 shared94 %
Daniel FREUND GreensGermany99 % of 5 473 shared94 %
Michael BLOSS GreensGermany99 % of 5 369 shared94 %
Maria OHISALO GreensFinland99 % of 4 639 shared94 %
Martin HÄUSLING GreensGermany99 % of 5 222 shared94 %
Alexandra GEESE GreensGermany99 % of 4 894 shared94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance89 % of 4 352 shared83 %
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands89 % of 4 795 shared83 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance88 % of 4 886 shared83 %
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance88 % of 3 793 shared83 %
Thijs REUTEN S&DNetherlands88 % of 5 339 shared83 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany88 % of 4 617 shared83 %
Marit MAIJ S&DNetherlands88 % of 5 469 shared83 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 984 shared83 %
Murielle LAURENT S&DFrance87 % of 4 998 shared83 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany87 % of 3 905 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now

Show all 5 seats

Dossiers

Show all 7 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

43 contributions recorded; 40 on behalf of their group; 98 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 3

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Amendments tabled in committee, 7

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 7 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Terry REINTKE”. Member record. memberId 103381. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=14&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/103381. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/103381?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-103381,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Terry REINTKE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=14&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=14&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 103381. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/103381. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}