Skip to content

Member

Loránt VINCZE

EPP · Romania

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Romania
Roll-call participation
85.8 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
91.9 %ⓘ of 532 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
UDMR Uniunea Democrată Maghiară din România
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
24 of 505 votesⓘ
Committees
AFCO, LIBE (substitute), SEDE (substitute)
Member id
98582
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

85.8 %

532 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−4.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

91.9 %

489 of 532 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (−3.6 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.8 %

24 of 505 votes where their group had a clear line

9 opposite (for ↔ against), 15 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

3.4 %

18 of 532 votes cast

Participation 85.8 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Loránt VINCZE85.8 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 91.9 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Loránt VINCZE91.9 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Final votePassed 377 for, 279 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 24 to recital 23 208 for, 465 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 29, adding text after recital 4 184 for, 479 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 28, adding text after recital 2 125 for, 536 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 27 to Article 6, paragraph 1, after point e 205 for, 463 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 26 to Article 3, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2 205 for, 460 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 8 432 for, 202 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Protocol on the Implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (2024-2029) (Resolution) Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 605 for, 68 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Agreement: cooperation between Eurojust and the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina competent for judicial cooperation in criminal matters Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 619 for, 9 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Protocol on the Implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (2024-2029) (Resolution) Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 10 192 for, 446 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Protocol on the Implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (2024-2029) Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 518 for, 104 against, 61 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Agreements on Financial Mechanisms for the period May 2021 - April 2028 (EEA: EU-Iceland-Liechtenstein-Norway; Norwegian: EU-Norway); Additional Protocols to EEC-Norway Agreement and to EEC-Iceland Agreement Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 528 for, 121 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 441 for, 173 against, 70 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 42 181 for, 477 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 41 216 for, 453 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 28 to paragraph 39 198 for, 434 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 36 115 for, 485 against, 85 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 34 187 for, 469 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 33 149 for, 486 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 32 179 for, 490 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 31 90 for, 579 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Paragraph 31 — part 3 497 for, 135 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 28 130 for, 505 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 28 132 for, 474 against, 59 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 44 to paragraph 28 97 for, 525 against, 57 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 43 to paragraph 27 96 for, 484 against, 105 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 26 195 for, 468 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 26 193 for, 472 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 26 186 for, 484 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 26 191 for, 472 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 92, adding text after paragraph 25 118 for, 522 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 25 137 for, 478 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 90, adding text after paragraph 25 143 for, 478 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 25 309 for, 304 against, 65 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 24 182 for, 466 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 24 184 for, 412 against, 81 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 86, adding text after paragraph 22 118 for, 549 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 83, adding text after paragraph 22 125 for, 524 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 82, adding text after paragraph 22 145 for, 529 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 22 326 for, 315 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 64 to paragraph 22 337 for, 311 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 80, adding text after paragraph 21 252 for, 381 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 63, adding text after paragraph 21 127 for, 497 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 21 160 for, 481 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 21 75 for, 519 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 20 106 for, 523 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 19 191 for, 463 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 19 372 for, 279 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 18 189 for, 471 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 79 to paragraph 18 308 for, 309 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 9 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Marie-Sophie CHRIST EPPGermany92 % of 1 539 shared89 %
Paulius SAUDARGAS EPPLithuania91 % of 5 100 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany91 % of 4 315 shared89 %
Iuliu WINKLER EPPRomania91 % of 4 766 shared89 %
Karlo RESSLER EPPCroatia91 % of 4 362 shared89 %
Sven SIMON EPPGermany90 % of 4 303 shared89 %
Davor Ivo STIER EPPCroatia90 % of 4 421 shared89 %
Gheorghe FALCĂ EPPRomania90 % of 4 530 shared89 %
Willemien KONING EPPNetherlands90 % of 1 802 shared89 %
Lena DÜPONT EPPGermany90 % of 4 214 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia81 % of 4 566 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland80 % of 3 970 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania80 % of 3 738 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania80 % of 4 525 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands80 % of 3 796 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium80 % of 4 979 shared82 %
Jérémy DECERLE RenewFrance79 % of 2 679 shared82 %
Jeannette BALJEU RenewNetherlands79 % of 4 466 shared82 %
Anouk VAN BRUG RenewNetherlands79 % of 3 984 shared82 %
Andreas GLÜCK RenewGermany79 % of 3 683 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-Türkiye Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-TR Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on European Cultural Heritage, Ways of Saint James and other European Cultural RoutesIG10-11 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Traditional Minorities, National Communities and LanguagesIG10-25 Intergroup / working groupChair29 Jan 2025now

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Show all 17 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

19 contributions recorded, 4 written statements; 2 on behalf of their group; 21 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
7 Jul 2026Presentation of the programme of activities of the Irish Presidency (debate) StatementRead
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded (A10-0145/2026 - Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens) (vote) Speech · 1 minRead
19 May 2026EU governance under pressure – institutional responses to global challenges (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Dec 2025The urgent need to combat discrimination in the EU through the horizontal anti-discrimination directive (topical debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 2 minRead
24 Nov 2025Enhancing police cooperation in relation to the prevention, detection and investigation of migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings; enhancing Europol’s support to preventing and combating such crimes (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
21 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
21 Oct 2025Statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations (A9-0223/2022 - Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens) (vote) SpeechRead
10 Jul 2025European Citizens' Initiative 'Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures' (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Jul 2025Post-2027 Common Agricultural Policy (debate) StatementRead
17 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report (debate) StatementRead

Show all 19 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 60

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0418Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0394Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0405Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors—
2 Sept 2026Implications for Union law of the amendments to the Slovak Citizenship Act E-10-2026-003466Written questionNot yet answered
24 Aug 2026Protection of Catholic religious sites in Bosnia and Herzegovina E-10-2026-003311Written questionwith 5 co-authorsNot yet answered
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0362Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan B-10-2026-0350Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0355Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0328Motion for a resolutionwith 28 co-authors—

Show all 60 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 44

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
24 Jun 2026Establishing the Union support for asylum, migration and integration for the period from 2028 to 2034 LIBE-AM-790113 LIBE14
24 Jun 2026Establishing the Union support for asylum, migration and integration for the period from 2028 to 2034 LIBE-AM-790146 LIBE10
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790058 CJ653
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790059 CJ659
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790061 CJ659
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790057 CJ655
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790062 CJ652
5 Jun 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788898 ITRE5
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788849 ITRE2
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788899 ITRE1

Show all 44 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Romania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Loránt VINCZE”. Member record. memberId 98582. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/98582?page=99&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 28 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/98582. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/98582?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-98582,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Loránt VINCZE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/98582?page=99&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/98582?page=99&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 98582. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/98582. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}