Skip to content

Dossier · Own-initiative report

Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations

Reference
2025/2041(INI) Own-initiative report
Where it stands
Parliament adopted the text on 22 October 2025. This is its final position on the matter.
Stage
Parliament’s position
Lead committee
Constitutional Affairs AFCO
More facts (5)
Author
Sandro GOZI
Shadow rapporteurs
6 members
Decisions in plenary
1
Versions
3 versions

Where it stands

The steps of this kind of dossier and how far it has come, from the procedure file.

  1. Referred to committee (done) 13 February 2025
  2. Committee work (done) Report adopted 23 September 2025
  3. Tabled for plenary (done) 2 October 2025
  4. Plenary vote (done) Adopted 22 October 2025
  5. Parliament’s position (done) Final

Parliament sets out its own position on a topic. The resolution is not binding but signals what Parliament wants.

People

Committees and members responsible for the dossier, as the procedure file names them. Groups as recorded there.

Lead committee
Constitutional Affairs AFCO
Author
Sandro GOZI (Renew)

Decisions in plenary, 1

Every decision Parliament took on this dossier, newest first.

Effect: what the decision did. Final vote: for–against–abstained, and how it was recorded.
DateDecisionKindEffectFinal vote
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations ResolutionsAdopted310 for, 277 against, 53 abstained by roll call

Voting grid

Export

Every roll-call vote on the dossier, in date and voting order, with each group's line at the date of the vote.

Each group's clear line at the date of the vote: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided; “< 10 voted” when fewer took part. Result: outcome, for–against–abstained (method).

  1. Adopted 485–152–5

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  2. Adopted 411–169–63

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Abst.
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  3. Adopted 321–270–47

    The Left
    Divided
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    Divided
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  4. Adopted 326–272–29

    The Left
    Divided
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    Divided
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  5. Adopted 344–227–45

    The Left
    Divided
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  6. Adopted 462–162–18

    The Left
    Divided
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    Against
  7. Adopted 381–236–25

    The Left
    Divided
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  8. Adopted 334–286–21

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    Divided
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
  9. Rejected 263–349–12

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Divided
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  10. Rejected 257–358–8

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    Against
    S&D
    Against
    Renew
    Against
    EPP
    Divided
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    For
    ESN
    For
  11. Adopted 464–136–42

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    Divided
    ESN
    Against
  12. Adopted 310–277–53

    The Left
    Against
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    Divided
    ECR
    Against
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
Add members’ columns
The people on this dossier — pick up to 6. Each gets a column with their own position.

Versions, 3

The text of the dossier, version by version, newest first. Compare shows what changed between two consecutive versions.

  1. Adopted by Parliament22 Oct 2025

    Adopted text TA10-0247/2025 TA-10-2025-0247

    Compare with tabled for plenary

  2. Tabled for plenary2 Oct 2025

    Report A10-0177/2025 A-10-2025-0177

    Compare with committee draft

  3. Committee draft6 Jun 2025

    Draft report (AFCO) AFCO-PR-774293

AI: Each version in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
  • Adopted text TA10-0247/2025: Parliament's resolution on the institutional consequences of EU enlargement argues that enlargement is a geostrategic investment and that the EU must reform its institutions to remain efficient, powerful and democratic as it grows.
  • Report A10-0177/2025: This resolution addresses the institutional consequences of EU enlargement, arguing that the EU must reform its institutions and decision-making to remain efficient, powerful, and democratic as new members join.
  • Draft report (AFCO): This draft report on the institutional consequences of EU enlargement argues that enlargement is a strategic investment and that the EU must reform its institutions to remain efficient, powerful and democratic.

Report a problem

What changed, 2

Between consecutive versions, newest pair first. The overviews are written by AI from the two texts; the comparison shows every change.

  1. Latest Tabled for plenary → Adopted by Parliament Report A10-0177/2025 → Adopted text TA10-0247/2025

    AI: What changed Written by AI from the official text — check the source

    The adopted text removes a call for specific Treaty reforms and reminders to the European Council, shifting focus away from institutional change proposals.

    Read the changes · Report a problem

    Compare the two versions

  2. Committee draft → Tabled for plenary Draft report (AFCO) → Report A10-0177/2025

    AI: What changed Written by AI from the official text — check the source

    The report shifts emphasis from general geopolitical benefits to merit-based accession and economic convergence, adding detailed recitals on GDP growth and convergence. It drops calls for intergovernmental cooperation outside the Treaties and instead stresses Treaty-based reforms, including QMV and Article 7 changes. It adds new paragraphs on MFF governance, own resources, and the role of accession countries' parliaments, while removing some previous calls. It rephrases several paragraphs on institutional composition and decision-making, adding references to recent resolutions and Treaty articles. The other changes are formal or wording: minor rephrasing and updates to align with new positions.

    Read the changes · Report a problem

    Compare the two versions

Timeline, 8

Every recorded step, newest first, grouped by stage; the latest stage is open.

Plenary stage 4 steps · 2 Oct 2025–22 Oct 2025
  1. 22 October 2025

    Plenary vote

    Sitting of 22 Oct 2025 Report A10-0177/2025Adopted text TA10-0247/2025

  2. 21 October 2025

    Debated in plenary

    MEPs debated the text in the chamber ahead of the vote.

    Sitting of 21 Oct 2025 Report A10-0177/2025

  3. 15 October 2025

    2 amendments tabled for the plenary vote

    Groups propose changes to the tabled text; each is voted on before the final vote.

    Amendments 1–2

  4. 2 October 2025

    Report tabled for plenary

    This is the text all MEPs vote on. Political groups can still table amendments to it.

    Report A10-0177/2025

Committee stage 4 steps · 13 Feb 2025–23 Sept 2025
  1. 23 September 2025

    Committee vote: report adopted

    AFCO (Constitutional Affairs) voted on the amendments and adopted the report that goes to plenary.

  2. 18 July 2025

    Amendments tabled in committee

    Members of AFCO (Constitutional Affairs) proposed changes to the draft.

    Amendments in committee (AFCO)

  3. 6 June 2025

    Draft report published

    The rapporteur’s first text in AFCO (Constitutional Affairs). Members can table amendments before the committee votes.

    Draft report (AFCO)

  4. 13 February 2025

    Referred to the AFCO (Constitutional Affairs) committee

    The lead committee prepares Parliament’s report.

Connections

Texts, decisions, people and other dossiers related to this one.

Texts voted on

Dossiers sharing a running issue

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations”. Dossier, 22 October 2025. procId 2025-2041, reference 2025/2041(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2025-2041 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Procedure file (Legislative Observatory, OEIL), https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/procedure-file?reference=2025%2F2041(INI). Data: EP Open Data API: procedure record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/procedures/2025-2041 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-dossier-2025-2041,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2025-2041}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2025-2041},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Dossier. procId 2025-2041, reference 2025/2041(INI). Official source: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/procedure-file?reference=2025\%2F2041(INI). Data: EP Open Data API: procedure record (CC BY 4.0)}
}