Dossier · Own-initiative report
European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded
- Reference
- 2026/2013(INI) Own-initiative report
- Where it stands
- Parliament adopted the text on 16 June 2026. This is its final position on the matter.
- Stage
- Parliament’s position
- Lead committee
- Constitutional Affairs AFCO
More facts (5)
- Authors
- Loránt VINCZE, Charles GOERENS
- Shadow rapporteurs
- 5 members
- Decisions in plenary
- 1
- Last vote
- 16 Jun 2026 · Adopted
- Versions
- 3 versions
Where it stands
The steps of this kind of dossier and how far it has come, from the procedure file.
- Referred to committee (done) 12 February 2026
- Committee work (done) Report adopted 5 May 2026
- Tabled for plenary (done) 12 May 2026
- Plenary vote (done) Adopted 16 June 2026
- Parliament’s position (done) Final
Parliament sets out its own position on a topic. The resolution is not binding but signals what Parliament wants.
People
Committees and members responsible for the dossier, as the procedure file names them. Groups as recorded there.
- Lead committee
- Constitutional Affairs AFCO
- Authors
- Loránt VINCZE (EPP), Charles GOERENS (Renew)
- Shadow rapporteurs
- Gabriele BISCHOFF (S&D), Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL (Patriots), Patryk JAKI (ECR), Reinier VAN LANSCHOT (Greens), Christine ANDERSON (ESN)
Decisions in plenary, 1
Every decision Parliament took on this dossier, newest first.
| Date | Decision | Kind | Effect | Final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Jun 2026 | European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded | Resolutions | Adopted | 426 for, 140 against, 107 abstained by roll call |
Every roll-call vote on the dossier, in date and voting order, with each group's line at the date of the vote.
Each group's clear line at the date of the vote: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided; “< 10 voted” when fewer took part. Result: outcome, for–against–abstained (method).
- 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4
Rejected 211–440–2
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 4
Rejected 211–453–2
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5
Rejected 79–557–26
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 14 to paragraph 20
Rejected 145–519–7
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- Against
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 16 Jun 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 20
Adopted 480–152–34
- The Left
- Divided
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20
Rejected 202–465–2
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20
Rejected 202–463–3
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 16 Jun 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 21
Adopted 510–148–13
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 8 to paragraph 22
Rejected 160–464–46
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- Divided
- ESN
- For
- 16 Jun 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 22
Adopted 462–128–82
- The Left
- For
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Abst.
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
- 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 2 to recital A
Rejected 191–467–13
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 16 Jun 2026 Amendment 3, adding text after recital A
Rejected 202–461–6
- The Left
- Against
- Greens
- Against
- S&D
- Against
- Renew
- Against
- EPP
- Against
- ECR
- For
- Patriots
- For
- ESN
- For
- 16 Jun 2026 Final vote — text as a whole
Adopted 426–140–107
- The Left
- Abst.
- Greens
- For
- S&D
- For
- Renew
- For
- EPP
- For
- ECR
- Abst.
- Patriots
- Against
- ESN
- Against
Add members’ columns
Versions, 3
The text of the dossier, version by version, newest first. Compare shows what changed between two consecutive versions.
Adopted by Parliament16 Jun 2026
Adopted text TA10-0202/2026 TA-10-2026-0202
Tabled for plenary12 May 2026
Report A10-0145/2026 A-10-2026-0145
Committee draft11 Mar 2026
Draft report (AFCO) AFCO-PR-784388
AI: Each version in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
- Adopted text TA10-0202/2026: This resolution assesses the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 on European political parties and foundations, focusing on the role and funding of foundations.
- Report A10-0145/2026: This resolution assesses the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 on European political parties and foundations, focusing on funding issues for foundations.
- Draft report (AFCO): This draft report assesses the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 on European political parties and foundations. It welcomes the recast Regulation but highlights funding challenges for foundations and calls for a review of funding rules.
What changed, 2
Between consecutive versions, newest pair first. The overviews are written by AI from the two texts; the comparison shows every change.
Latest Tabled for plenary → Adopted by Parliament Report A10-0145/2026 → Adopted text TA10-0202/2026
AI: What changed Written by AI from the official text — check the source
The versions differ only in formal points: a typo in a regulation number is corrected.
Committee draft → Tabled for plenary Draft report (AFCO) → Report A10-0145/2026
AI: What changed Written by AI from the official text — check the source
Adds provisions on regulatory burden, simplification, and corrective measures for foundations. Expands funding flexibility by encouraging cooperation, clarifying membership rules, and proposing higher donation caps. Proposes a single online reporting system to reduce administrative burden and improve transparency. Shifts the call from a recast proposal to a review of national frameworks that may hinder payments. Other changes are wording refinements and rephrasing.
Timeline, 7
Every recorded step, newest first, grouped by stage; the latest stage is open.
Plenary stage 3 steps · 12 May 2026–16 Jun 2026
16 June 2026
Plenary vote
Sitting of 16 Jun 2026 Report A10-0145/2026Adopted text TA10-0202/2026
9 June – 10 June 2026
14 amendments tabled for the plenary vote
Groups propose changes to the tabled text; each is voted on before the final vote.
12 May 2026
Report tabled for plenary
This is the text all MEPs vote on. Political groups can still table amendments to it.
Committee stage 4 steps · 12 Feb 2026–5 May 2026
5 May 2026
Committee vote: report adopted
AFCO (Constitutional Affairs) voted on the amendments and adopted the report that goes to plenary.
27 March 2026
Amendments tabled in committee
Members of AFCO (Constitutional Affairs) proposed changes to the draft.
11 March 2026
Draft report published
The rapporteur’s first text in AFCO (Constitutional Affairs). Members can table amendments before the committee votes.
12 February 2026
Referred to the AFCO (Constitutional Affairs) committee
The lead committee prepares Parliament’s report.
Connections
Texts, decisions, people and other dossiers related to this one.
Texts voted on
- Text REPORT European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Report A10-0145/2026 16 Jun 2026
Other dossiers of the same rapporteur
- Dossier The statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations (recast) 2021/0375(COD) · Ordinary legislative procedure 21 Oct 2025 Passed
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded”. Dossier, 16 June 2026. procId 2026-2013, reference 2026/2013(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2026-2013 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Procedure file (Legislative Observatory, OEIL), https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/procedure-file?reference=2026%2F2013(INI). Data: EP Open Data API: procedure record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/procedures/2026-2013 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-dossier-2026-2013,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-06-16},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2026-2013}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2026-2013},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Dossier. procId 2026-2013, reference 2026/2013(INI). Official source: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/procedure-file?reference=2026\%2F2013(INI). Data: EP Open Data API: procedure record (CC BY 4.0)}
}