Skip to content

Decision

Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production

Effect
Passed
Result
374 for · 176 against · 36 abstained roll call
Date
22 May 2025, 12:18–12:19
Kind
New EU law · 1st reading
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Committee report by Veronika Vrecionová
Topics
Agriculture, food & fisheriesEconomy & single market Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
5 votes · 4 roll calls · 3 amendments
Requested by
Patriots (1 roll call)
Final vote
176688
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 374 for, 176 against, 36 abstained (roll call).

Passed by a large majority.

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 amendments (3 rejected).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by Patriots and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 19Against 15Abst. 2No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 101Against 6Abst. 0No vote 29 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
RenewFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 127Against 20Abst. 3No vote 38 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
ECRFor 16Against 25Abst. 28No vote 11 of 80Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.11
PatriotsFor 1Against 70Abst. 0No vote 14 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 3Against 22Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 2Against 18Abst. 3No vote 6 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 33

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria146000.55
Belgium154030.68
Bulgaria105110.44
Cyprus2103—
Czechia89040.29
Germany56190210.62
Denmark130021.00
Estonia6001—
Spain448260.72
Finland100051.00
France27440100.43
Greece93180.54
Croatia5016—
Hungary210090.75
Ireland110031.00
Italy251123170.14
Lithuania101000.86
Luxembourg5001—
Latvia6102—
Malta4002—
Netherlands213070.81
Poland742040.79
Portugal182100.79
Romania1614120.64
Sweden190021.00
Slovenia5031—
Slovakia66030.25

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 586 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Pina PICIERNO changed group ItalyRenewSpeeches122 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Christel SCHALDEMOSE DenmarkS&DSpeeches13 Apr 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 5

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 3 A10-0043/2025 - Veronika Vrecionová - Rejet - Am 3 Roll call180 for, 367 against, 43 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
2Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively Show of hands Adopted
3Amendment 4, adding text after recital 11 A10-0043/2025 - Veronika Vrecionová - Après le considérant 11 - Am 4 Roll call181 for, 396 against, 4 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
4Amendment 5, adding text after recital 11 A10-0043/2025 - Veronika Vrecionová - Après le considérant 11 - Am 5 Roll call177 for, 400 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
5Final vote A10-0043/2025 - Veronika Vrecionová - Proposition de la Commission Roll call374 for, 176 against, 36 abstained Adopted
Show the other 4 votesShow the other 0 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively Show of hands Adopted
3Amendment 4, adding text after recital 11 A10-0043/2025 - Veronika Vrecionová - Après le considérant 11 - Am 4 Roll call181 for, 396 against, 4 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
4Amendment 5, adding text after recital 11 A10-0043/2025 - Veronika Vrecionová - Après le considérant 11 - Am 5 Roll call177 for, 400 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
5Final vote A10-0043/2025 - Veronika Vrecionová - Proposition de la Commission Roll call374 for, 176 against, 36 abstained Adopted

Roll call requested by Patriots.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0043

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The proposal updates EU rules on recognising field inspections and seed production in Moldova and Ukraine as equivalent to EU standards.

Parliament adopted its position, supporting the Commission's proposal with two technical amendments on inspections.

The amendments aim to ensure products entering the single market fully comply with EU production requirements.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament's amended version of the proposed decision updates Council Decision 2003/17/EC to recognise field inspections and seed production in Moldova for fodder plants and in Ukraine for beet and oil plants as equivalent to EU standards.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/0027(COD) · Ordinary legislative procedure

Granting equivalence with EU requirements to Moldova and Ukraine as regards field inspections and production of seed

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 20 June 2025 and now EU law.

Show the 6 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 26 February 2024 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 19 March 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 25 March 2025 (done)
  4. Negotiations with the Council · Talks opened 3 April 2025 (done)
  5. Plenary vote · Adopted 22 May 2025 (done)
  6. Published as law · 20 June 2025 (done)

Lead committee: AGRI · Rapporteur: Veronika VRECIONOVÁ (ECR)

Other decisions on this dossier

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 6 connections: Other decisions on this dossier · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Other decisions on this dossier

See all: Other decisions on this dossier

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production”. Decision, 22 May 2025. votingId 176688, document A-10-2025-0043, reference 2024/0027(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-22/3 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-22/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-05-22-3,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-22/3}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-22/3},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 176688, document A-10-2025-0043, reference 2024/0027(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}