Skip to content

Member

Katarína ROTH NEVEĎALOVÁ

No group · Slovakia

Group
No group NI
Country
Slovakia
Roll-call participation
96.3 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
—ⓘ The non-attached have no group line.
More facts (5)
National party
SMER-SD SMER-Sociálna demokracia
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
—ⓘ The non-attached have no group line.
Committees
AGRI, REGI (substitute)
Member id
96653
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

96.3 %

597 of 620 final votes while in office

Non-attached median: 89.2 %

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority lineⓘ

—

The non-attached have no group line.

Against clear lineⓘ

—

The non-attached have no group line.

Abstention ⓘ

16.9 %

101 of 597 votes cast

Participation 96.3 % — Non-attached median 89.2 %, 31 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 31 members of the Non-attached with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Katarína ROTH NEVEĎALOVÁ96.3 %
Non-attached median89.2 %
Lowest in the group59.2 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members31
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other non-attached members; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.
  • The non-attached have no group line: loyalty and votes against a clear line are not computed.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 36 205 for, 344 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 36 202 for, 346 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 36 158 for, 398 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Separate vote on paragraph 35 551 for, 12 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 36 to paragraph 22 208 for, 264 against, 94 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 35 to paragraph 21 205 for, 262 against, 96 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 34 to paragraph 18 198 for, 354 against, 14 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Paragraph 9 — part 2 306 for, 225 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Paragraph 9 — part 1 422 for, 83 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 30 to paragraph 9 158 for, 374 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 29 to paragraph 8 191 for, 371 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 27 to paragraph 6 187 for, 380 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 25 to paragraph 3 198 for, 366 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
21 May 2026Rights, support and protection of victims of crime Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 440 for, 49 against, 84 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026The cases of human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 469 for, 38 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
21 May 2026The cases of human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia Amendment 1 to paragraph 6 87 for, 415 against, 65 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 480 for, 5 against, 83 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 3 to paragraph 7 296 for, 252 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 184 for, 348 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 2 142 for, 380 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 1 155 for, 382 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 5 to paragraph 4 295 for, 189 against, 73 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 2 181 for, 338 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 516 for, 14 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 2, adding text after recital D 185 for, 371 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 1, adding text after recital D 184 for, 368 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 8 to paragraph 12 106 for, 386 against, 77 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 7 to paragraph 12 165 for, 386 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Paragraph 11 — part 2 435 for, 113 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Paragraph 11 — part 1 502 for, 41 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 180 for, 383 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5 195 for, 355 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 201 for, 347 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 178 for, 379 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 2 72 for, 459 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 240 for, 312 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
21 May 2026Periodic roadworthiness tests and technical roadside inspection (Roadworthiness package) Decision to open negotiations with the CouncilNegotiating mandate approved 369 for, 126 against, 84 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
21 May 2026Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 on securitisation and a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation Decision to open negotiations with the CouncilNegotiating mandate approved 294 for, 194 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
21 May 2026Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions as regards requirements for securitisation exposures Decision to open negotiations with the CouncilNegotiating mandate approved 294 for, 192 against, 90 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 347 for, 165 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Amendment 10, adding text after recital D 187 for, 440 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Amendment 1, adding text after recital C 201 for, 438 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Separate vote on citation 25 451 for, 145 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Separate vote on citation 11 464 for, 134 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Separate vote on citation 7 426 for, 192 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Separate vote on paragraph 21 465 for, 122 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Paragraph 19 — part 2 463 for, 151 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Paragraph 19 — part 1 572 for, 37 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Paragraph 15 — part 2 635 for, 4 against, 3 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Amendment 4 to paragraph 15 184 for, 454 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within No group

No member meets the rule within the group.

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Monika BEŇOVÁ No groupSlovakia83 % of 4 422 shared44 %
Erik KALIŇÁK No groupSlovakia82 % of 5 284 shared44 %
Judita LAŠŠÁKOVÁ No groupSlovakia79 % of 5 379 shared44 %
Ľuboš BLAHA No groupSlovakia74 % of 5 064 shared44 %
Kateřina KONEČNÁ No groupCzechia69 % of 5 160 shared44 %
Ondřej DOSTÁL No groupCzechia67 % of 5 186 shared44 %
Branislav ONDRUŠ No groupSlovakia64 % of 4 373 shared44 %
Aldo PATRICIELLO PatriotsItaly59 % of 2 456 shared51 %
Fernand KARTHEISER changed group No groupLuxembourg59 % of 5 372 shared45 %
András GYÜRK PatriotsHungary58 % of 3 614 shared51 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with Central AsiaDCAS DelegationMember16 Dec 2024now
Delegation for relations with Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo, including the EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee and the EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeDSEE DelegationSubstitute4 Dec 2024now
Intergroup on the Future of Education and Skills for a Competitive EuropeIG10-14 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)IG10-22 Intergroup / working groupMember12 Mar 2025now
Intergroup on the Social Economy and Services of General InterestIG10-23 Intergroup / working groupMember30 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Trade UnionsIG10-24 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeSubstitute8 Nov 202413 Nov 2024
Delegation for relations with Central AsiaDCAS DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 202415 Dec 2024

Show all 12 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationREGI5 May 2026

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

60 contributions recorded, 12 written statements; 59 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
16 Sept 2026Stop gold-plating, relieve SMEs: Member States must implement EU legislation without adding extra bureaucracy (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
6 Jul 2026Air passenger rights (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
18 Jun 2026Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles (debate) StatementRead
20 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities (debate) StatementRead
19 May 2026Presentation of the Fertilisers Action Plan (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
30 Apr 2026How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases? (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026Danger of normalising relations with Russia, including its participation in major cultural and sports events (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026Danger of normalising relations with Russia, including its participation in major cultural and sports events (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
11 Mar 2026EUCO and situation in the Middle East (joint debate) StatementRead
9 Mar 2026Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 31

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
17 Sept 2026We have ended our dependence. Are we competitive yet? E-10-2026-003736Written questionwith 1 co-authorNot yet answered
15 Jun 2026Nuclear power and data centres E-10-2026-002448Written questionwith 13 co-authors4 Aug 2026
28 Apr 2026Rising agricultural production costs and supply chain disruptions following conflict escalations in the Middle East E-10-2026-001734Written questionwith 15 co-authors22 Jun 2026
25 Mar 2026Does the Commission want to secretly push through ‘parenthood’ from commercial surrogacy and circumvent prohibitions in force in traditional states? E-10-2026-001252Written questionwith 2 co-authors27 May 2026
25 Mar 2026Green transition or just a rip-off? Millions of euros from citizens’ pockets will flow into Brussels funds, but will this result in cleaner air? E-10-2026-001253Written questionwith 2 co-authors12 May 2026
11 Mar 2026Financing EU priorities in a sustainable, predictable and resilient way through a new EU own resource from the online gambling and betting services sector O-10-2026-000014Oral questionwith 42 co-authorsNot yet answered
10 Mar 2026Zelenskyy threatens Orbán with Ukrainian tanks: When will the EU stop tolerating these crazy threats? E-10-2026-000994Written questionwith 5 co-authors7 May 2026
6 Mar 2026EU-Australia: sugar subject to yet another free trade agreement P-10-2026-000943Priority written questionwith 10 co-authors23 Apr 2026
3 Mar 2026Three years since the railway accident in Tempi, Greece O-10-2026-000010Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
15 Dec 2025Corruption scandals in the Office of the President of Ukraine and securing the Ukraine Facility E-10-2025-004956Written questionwith 13 co-authors9 Mar 2026

Show all 31 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 46

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
17 Jul 2026Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agriculture AGRI-AM-791100 AGRI15
17 Jul 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790898 AGRI2
14 Jul 2026Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2025 PETI-AM-790995 PETI36
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790957 AGRI1
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790954 AGRI4
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790955 AGRI1
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790964 AGRI4
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790899 AGRI2
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790915 AGRI1
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790917 AGRI11

Show all 46 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Slovakia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Katarína ROTH NEVEĎALOVÁ”. Member record. memberId 96653. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96653?page=20&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96653. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/96653?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-96653,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Katarína ROTH NEVEĎALOVÁ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96653?page=20&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96653?page=20&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 96653. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96653. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}