Skip to content

Decision

The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan

Effect
Adopted
Result
476 for · 28 against · 96 abstained roll call
Date
9 July 2026, 13:35–13:40
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Foreign affairs Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
25 votes · 18 roll calls · 6 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · S&D (1 roll call) · Renew (1 roll call) · EPP (2 split votes) · ECR (1 roll call, 2 split votes) · Patriots (1 roll call, 2 split votes) · ESN (1 roll call)
Final vote
195769
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 476 for, 28 against, 96 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 6 amendments (6 rejected) and 11 parts of the text voted on separately (10 adopted, 1 rejected). 7 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR and ESN; Patriots mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 1No vote 9 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 109Against 0Abst. 1No vote 25 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 142Against 2Abst. 18No vote 22 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
ECRFor 35Against 2Abst. 30No vote 17 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.28
PatriotsFor 12Against 24Abst. 26No vote 23 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.13
ESNFor 14Against 0Abst. 11No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
No groupFor 15Against 0Abst. 9No vote 4 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Voted against their group, 22

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria130610.53
Belgium150340.75
Bulgaria71450.38
Cyprus2103—
Czechia131160.80
Germany6302580.57
Denmark130200.80
Estonia6001—
Spain510270.94
Finland140011.00
France41241150.43
Greece101460.50
Croatia90120.85
Hungary70113—
Ireland110031.00
Italy32022220.39
Lithuania110001.00
Luxembourg5001—
Latvia6030—
Malta5001—
Netherlands230530.73
Poland420650.81
Portugal170220.84
Romania200670.65
Sweden210001.00
Slovenia9000—
Slovakia100230.75

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 600 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Sophie WILMÈS BelgiumRenewSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS SpainEPPSpeeches28 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Marc BOTENGA BelgiumThe LeftSpeeches18 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
France JAMET FrancePatriotsSpeeches18 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Tomasz FROELICH GermanyESNSpeeches18 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Jan-Christoph OETJEN GermanyRenewSpeeches18 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Show the other 12 speakers

All votes on this decision, 25

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Separate vote on paragraph 1 RC-B10-0357/2026 – § 1 Roll call594 for, 4 against, 7 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
2Separate vote on paragraph 2 RC-B10-0357/2026 – § 2 Roll call594 for, 0 against, 2 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
3Separate vote on paragraph 3 RC-B10-0357/2026 – § 3 Roll call532 for, 49 against, 25 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
Show the other 24 votesShow the other 22 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Separate vote on paragraph 2 RC-B10-0357/2026 – § 2 Roll call594 for, 0 against, 2 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
3Separate vote on paragraph 3 RC-B10-0357/2026 – § 3 Roll call532 for, 49 against, 25 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Separate vote on paragraph 4 RC-B10-0357/2026 – § 4 Roll call570 for, 10 against, 20 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
5Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 3 RC-B10-0357/2026 – After § 3 – Am 6 Roll call172 for, 431 against, 4 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
6Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 RC-B10-0357/2026 – After § 4 – Am 2 Roll call87 for, 454 against, 62 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
7Paragraph 5 — part 1 RC-B10-0357/2026 – § 5/1 Part voted on: “Condemns all external interference fuelling the war; urges all states,”Roll call583 for, 1 against, 19 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots, EPP, ECR
8Paragraph 5 — part 2 RC-B10-0357/2026 – § 5/2 Part voted on: “including the UAE,”Roll call291 for, 280 against, 33 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots, S&D; split: Patriots, EPP, ECR
9Paragraph 5 — part 3 RC-B10-0357/2026 – § 5/3 Part voted on: “to cease financing, arms supply or other support of the RSF; urges the EEAS and the Council to sanction individuals, entities and external enablers and private security companies,”Roll call563 for, 14 against, 28 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots, EPP, ECR
10Paragraph 5 — part 4 RC-B10-0357/2026 – § 5/4 Part voted on: “such as Global Security Services Group,”Roll call292 for, 279 against, 32 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots, EPP, ECR
11Paragraph 5 — part 5 RC-B10-0357/2026 – § 5/5 Part voted on: “for breaching the UN arms embargo, and to work with the UNSC to extend the embargo to all of Sudan;”Roll call543 for, 23 against, 36 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots, EPP, ECR
12Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 RC-B10-0357/2026 – After § 5 – Am 3 Roll call85 for, 445 against, 68 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
13Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 RC-B10-0357/2026 – After § 5 – Am 4 Roll call72 for, 482 against, 49 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
14Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 RC-B10-0357/2026 – After § 6 – Am 5 Roll call100 for, 404 against, 94 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
15Paragraph 7 — part 1 RC-B10-0357/2026 – § 7/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘the UAE,’”Roll call580 for, 2 against, 17 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots, EPP, ECR
16Paragraph 7 — part 2 RC-B10-0357/2026 – § 7/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call281 for, 285 against, 31 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots, S&D; split: Patriots, EPP, ECR
17Amendment 1, adding text after recital D RC-B10-0357/2026 – After recital D – Am 1 Roll call188 for, 330 against, 84 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
18Final vote — text as a whole RC-B10-0357/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call476 for, 28 against, 96 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
19Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0357/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
20Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0358/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
21Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0359/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
22Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0360/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
23Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0361/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
24Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0362/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
25Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0363/2026 Show of hands Lapsed

Roll calls requested by The Left, S&D, Renew, ECR, Patriots, ESN · split votes by EPP (2), ECR (2), Patriots (2).

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2026-0361

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution condemning the escalating violence in and around El-Obeid, Sudan, and warning of the risk of mass civilian harm and atrocity crimes.

The text demands that the Rapid Support Forces halt their offensive and that all parties cease attacks on civilians, civilian infrastructure, medical facilities, and humanitarian personnel.

It calls for immediate humanitarian access, investigations into alleged violations, and targeted EU measures against those providing military support in breach of the UN arms embargo.

Parliament also asks the EU and member states to increase humanitarian support and treat El-Obeid as an atrocity-prevention priority.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution condemns escalating violence in El-Obeid, Sudan, and demands that the RSF halt its offensive and all parties cease attacks on civilians and infrastructure.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2026/2799(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Parliament adopted the text on 9 July 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 9 July 2026 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 9 connections: Running issue: Sudan war · Running issue: Humanitarian crises

Running issue: Sudan war

Running issue: Humanitarian crises

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan”. Decision, 9 July 2026. votingId 195769, document B-10-2026-0361, reference 2026/2799(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-09/5 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-09/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-07-09-5,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-09/5}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-09/5},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 195769, document B-10-2026-0361, reference 2026/2799(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}