Skip to content

Decision

Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness

Effect
Adopted
Result
366 for · 192 against · 39 abstained roll call
Date
9 July 2026, 13:46
Kind
Resolution
More facts (8)
Margin
by a clear majority
Source
Committee report by Ľudovít Ódor
Topics
Economy & single market Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
194869
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 366 for, 192 against, 39 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a clear majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by The Left, ECR, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 12Against 19Abst. 5No vote 9 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
GreensFor 42Against 1Abst. 3No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
S&DFor 98Against 1Abst. 8No vote 28 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
RenewFor 63Against 4Abst. 0No vote 11 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 149Against 4Abst. 6No vote 25 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 0Against 62Abst. 3No vote 19 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 0Against 63Abst. 5No vote 17 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 2Against 14Abst. 8No vote 4 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Voted against their group, 36

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria136010.53
Belgium98140.25
Bulgaria74150.38
Cyprus2103—
Czechia611040.47
Germany61193130.60
Denmark103110.57
Estonia6001—
Spain419280.68
Finland121020.88
France25356150.30
Greece87060.30
Croatia91020.85
Hungary68070.36
Ireland75020.38
Italy32175220.39
Lithuania7202—
Luxembourg4011—
Latvia5400—
Malta0231—
Netherlands197230.52
Poland2424050.25
Portugal154020.68
Romania186090.63
Sweden85800.07
Slovenia8010—
Slovakia43530.13

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 597 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Vytenis Povilas ANDRIUKAITIS LithuaniaS&DSpeeches29 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Karlo RESSLER CroatiaEPPSpeeches29 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA SpainEPPSpeeches29 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Wouter BEKE BelgiumEPPSpeeches29 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Ľudovít ÓDOR SlovakiaRenewSpeeches29 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Per CLAUSEN DenmarkThe LeftSpeeches29 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Show the other 42 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Christel SCHALDEMOSE DenmarkS&DSpeeches29 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Luděk NIEDERMAYER CzechiaEPPSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Maria GRAPINI RomaniaS&DSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Fabio DE MASI GermanyNo groupSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Jonás FERNÁNDEZ SpainS&DSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Jussi SARAMO FinlandThe LeftSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Marc BOTENGA BelgiumThe LeftSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Arba KOKALARI SwedenEPPSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Bogdan RZOŃCA PolandECRSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN DenmarkGreensSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Gilles BOYER FranceRenewSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Lefteris NIKOLAOU-ALAVANOS GreeceNo groupSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Lídia PEREIRA PortugalEPPSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Virginijus SINKEVIČIUS LithuaniaGreensSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sophie WILMÈS BelgiumRenewSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Rihards KOLS LatviaECRSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
René REPASI GermanyS&DSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Matthias ECKE GermanyS&DSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECRSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Petras GRAŽULIS LithuaniaESNSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Paulius SAUDARGAS LithuaniaEPPSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Ondřej DOSTÁL CzechiaNo groupSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Julie RECHAGNEUX FrancePatriotsSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Pierre PIMPIE FrancePatriotsSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Angéline FURET FrancePatriotsSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Maria ZACHARIA GreeceNo groupSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Lukas SIEPER changed group GermanyRenewSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Michalis HADJIPANTELA CyprusEPPSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Fernando NAVARRETE ROJAS SpainEPPSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Bruno GONÇALVES PortugalS&DSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Arkadiusz MULARCZYK PolandECRSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Ana VASCONCELOS PortugalRenewSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Marlena MALĄG PolandECRSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Giovanni CROSETTO ItalyECRSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Antonella SBERNA ItalyECRSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Gheorghe PIPEREA RomaniaECRSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Nikola MINCHEV BulgariaRenewSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ IrelandRenewSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Guillaume PELTIER FranceECRSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Seán KELLY IrelandEPPSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR SpainS&DSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Enikő GYŐRI HungaryPatriotsSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote on the motion for a resolution A10-0167/2026 – Ľudovít Ódor – Motion for a resolution Roll call366 for, 192 against, 39 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0167

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on the feasibility of a 28th tax regime, an optional corporate legal framework for innovative companies, start-ups and scale-ups, including tax provisions.

The regime aims to complement national frameworks, not harmonise them, and to reduce regulatory and tax fragmentation that burdens cross-border growth.

The resolution is Parliament's official position, and it calls for the regime to support EU competitiveness and strategic autonomy.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution addresses the feasibility of a 28th tax regime to support EU competitiveness. It welcomes the Commission's 'EU Inc.' proposal and outlines principles for a tax module, covering corporate income, VAT, withholding tax, employee taxation, transfer pricing, access to capital, and tax incentives.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2211(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 9 July 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 13 November 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 3 June 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 10 June 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 9 July 2026 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: ECON · Author: Ľudovít ÓDOR (Renew)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 16 connections: Running issue: EU competitiveness · Other decisions of the part-session on ECON dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: EU competitiveness

Other decisions of the part-session on ECON dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on ECON dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness”. Decision, 9 July 2026. votingId 194869, document A-10-2026-0167, reference 2025/2211(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-09/9 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-09/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-07-09-9,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-09/9}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-09/9},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 194869, document A-10-2026-0167, reference 2025/2211(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}