Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Decision

Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund

Effect
Passed
Result
433 for · 97 against · 146 abstained roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:16–13:21
Kind
New EU law · 1st reading
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Text
Report A-10-2026-0202
Dossier
2025/0418(COD)
Source
Committee report by Pascal Canfin
Topics
Climate & environmentEconomy & single market Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
53 votes · 11 roll calls · 9 amendments
Requested by
Greens (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call, 4 split votes, 1 separate vote) · ESN (1 roll call, 1 separate vote)
Sitting
Tuesday 15 September 2026
Final vote
196109
More
Cite this page Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page
Votes on this decision
Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 433 for, 97 against, 146 abstained (roll call).

Passed by a large majority.

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 9 amendments (2 adopted, 7 rejected) and 29 parts of the text voted on separately (9 adopted, 18 rejected, 2 lapsed). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by Patriots and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 2No vote 4 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 124Against 0Abst. 4No vote 7 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 74Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 140Against 3Abst. 34No vote 7 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.69
ECRFor 0Against 10Abst. 68No vote 6 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.81
PatriotsFor 0Against 46Abst. 28No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.43
ESNFor 2Against 25Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
No groupFor 4Against 13Abst. 10No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Voted against their group, 55

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria96500.17
Belgium153400.52
Bulgaria103310.44
Cyprus5010—
Czechia68520.13
Germany7120130.66
Denmark112020.77
Estonia5101—
Spain507210.77
Finland92310.46
France4413240.36
Greece146100.50
Croatia110100.88
Hungary110630.38
Ireland110031.00
Italy4362340.40
Lithuania81200.59
Luxembourg5100—
Latvia5130—
Malta2031—
Netherlands225310.60
Poland833750.66
Portugal171120.84
Romania193470.60
Sweden174000.71
Slovenia8100—
Slovakia72600.20

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 676 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Pascal CANFIN FranceRenewSpeeches315 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Victor NEGRESCU RomaniaS&DSpeeches115 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Michael BLOSS GermanyGreensSpeeches414 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Milan MAZUREK changed group SlovakiaESNSpeeches414 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Antonella SBERNA ItalyECRSpeeches414 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Cristian TERHEŞ RomaniaECRSpeeches314 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Show the other 27 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Lukas SIEPER changed group GermanyRenewSpeeches314 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Mohammed CHAHIM NetherlandsS&DSpeeches214 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Pierfrancesco MARAN ItalyS&DSpeeches214 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Maria GRAPINI RomaniaS&DSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Lynn BOYLAN IrelandThe LeftSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Javi LÓPEZ SpainS&DSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Massimiliano SALINI ItalyEPPSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Adam JARUBAS PolandEPPSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Ondřej KNOTEK CzechiaPatriotsSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Alexandr VONDRA CzechiaECRSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Abstained
Anna ZALEWSKA PolandECRSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Alexander BERNHUBER AustriaEPPSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Katri KULMUNI FinlandRenewSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Roman HAIDER AustriaPatriotsSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Barry ANDREWS IrelandRenewSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sara MATTHIEU BelgiumGreensSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Emma WIESNER SwedenRenewSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Li ANDERSSON FinlandThe LeftSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Danuše NERUDOVÁ CzechiaEPPSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Anja ARNDT GermanyESNSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Michalis HADJIPANTELA CyprusEPPSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Sandra GÓMEZ LÓPEZ SpainS&DSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Dariusz JOŃSKI PolandEPPSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Niels Flemming HANSEN DenmarkEPPSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Grzegorz BRAUN PolandNo groupSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Stefano CAVEDAGNA ItalyECRSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Annalisa CORRADO ItalyS&DSpeeches114 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For

All votes on this decision, 53

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively Show of hands Adopted
2Amendments by the committee responsible — separate and split votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes Show of hands Adopted
3Amendments by the committee responsible — separate and split votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes Show of hands Adopted
Show the other 52 votesShow the other 50 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendments by the committee responsible — separate and split votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes Show of hands Adopted
3Amendments by the committee responsible — separate and split votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes Show of hands Adopted
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendments by the committee responsible — separate and split votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes Show of hands Adopted
5Amendments by the committee responsible — separate and split votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes Show of hands Adopted
6Amendments by the committee responsible — separate and split votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes Show of hands Adopted
7Amendments by the committee responsible — separate and split votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes Show of hands Adopted
8Amendments by the committee responsible — separate and split votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes Show of hands Adopted
9Amendments by the committee responsible — separate and split votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes Show of hands Adopted
10Amendments by the committee responsible — separate and split votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes Show of hands Adopted
11Amendments by the committee responsible — separate and split votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes Show of hands Adopted
12Amendment 39 — part 2 A10-0202/2026 – Pascal Canfin – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes – Am 39/2 Part voted on: “point (d)”Roll call439 for, 207 against, 22 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots
13Amendments by the committee responsible — separate and split votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes Show of hands Adopted
14Amendments by the committee responsible — separate and split votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes Show of hands Adopted
15Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1 Show of hands Rejected
16Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 2 Show of hands Rejected
17Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 3 Show of hands Rejected
18Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 3 Show of hands Adopted
19Amendment 35 to Article 3, paragraph 4 A10-0202/2026 – Pascal Canfin – Article 3, § 4 – Am 35 Roll call415 for, 247 against, 11 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
20Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 4 Show of hands Lapsed
21Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 5 Counted199 for, 470 against, 1 abstained Rejected
22Amendment 93 to Article 4, after paragraph 2 A10-0202/2026 – Pascal Canfin – Article 4, after § 2 – Am 93 Roll call193 for, 455 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
23Amendment 94 to Article 6, paragraph 3 A10-0202/2026 – Pascal Canfin – Article 6, § 3 – Am 94 Roll call194 for, 466 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
24Separate vote on Article 6, paragraph 3 Show of hands Rejected
25Separate vote on Article 6, paragraph 3 Show of hands Adopted
26Amendment 86 to Article 7 A10-0202/2026 – Pascal Canfin – Article 7 – Am 86D Roll call193 for, 472 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, Patriots
27Separate vote on Article 7 Show of hands Adopted
28Separate vote on Article 7 Show of hands Adopted
29Separate vote on Article 7 Show of hands Adopted
30Amendment 96 to Article 7, after paragraph 1 A10-0202/2026 – Pascal Canfin – Article 7, after § 1 – Am 96 Roll call194 for, 467 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
31Separate vote on Article 7, paragraph 3 Show of hands Rejected
32Amendment 87 to Article 7, paragraph 3 A10-0202/2026 – Pascal Canfin – Article 7, § 3 – Am 87 Roll call190 for, 459 against, 18 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, Patriots
33Separate vote on Article 7, paragraph 3 Show of hands Adopted
34Separate vote on Article 7, after paragraph 3 Show of hands Rejected
35Separate vote on Article 8 Article 8 – § 2 – point c – introductory part Show of hands Rejected
36Separate vote on Article 8 Article 8 – § 2 – point c – point i Show of hands Rejected
37Separate vote on Article 8 Article 8 – § 2 – point c – point ii Show of hands Rejected
38Separate vote on Article 8, after paragraph 2 Show of hands Rejected
39Separate vote on Article 8, paragraph 3 Show of hands Rejected
40Separate vote on Article 10 Article 10 – § 1 – point a Show of hands Rejected
41Separate vote on Article 10 Article 10 – § 1 – point b Show of hands Rejected
42Separate vote on Article 10 Article 10 – § 1 – point c Show of hands Rejected
43Separate vote on Article 10, paragraph 3 Show of hands Rejected
44Separate vote on Article 10, paragraph 3 Show of hands Adopted
45Separate vote on Article 14, paragraph 2 Show of hands Rejected
46Amendment 83 to recital 1 A10-0202/2026 – Pascal Canfin – Recital 1 – Am 83 Roll call195 for, 465 against, 16 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
47Separate vote on recital 1 Show of hands Adopted
48Separate vote on recital 1 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
49Amendment 88, adding text after Recital 3 A10-0202/2026 – Pascal Canfin – After Recital 3 – Am 88 Roll call165 for, 465 against, 36 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
50Separate vote on recital 14 Show of hands Rejected
51Separate vote on recital 14 Show of hands Adopted
52Final vote A10-0202/2026 – Pascal Canfin – Commission proposal Roll call433 for, 97 against, 146 abstained Adopted
53Referral back to committee Request for referral back to committee Show of hands Adopted

Roll calls requested by Greens, Patriots, ESN · split votes by Patriots (4) · separate votes by Patriots, ESN.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0202

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament set out its position on a proposed regulation that would create a Temporary Decarbonisation Fund to support operators in energy-intensive sectors facing a remaining carbon leakage risk, complementing the EU Emissions Trading System and the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism.

Parliament adopted this position at first reading, which means it can now negotiate with the Council before the law is final.

Parliament also called on the Commission to refer the matter back to it if the proposal is replaced or substantially amended.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament's amended version of the Commission proposal for a regulation establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund. The Fund would give temporary financial support in 2027-2029 to operators and downstream operators in carbon-intensive sectors facing a remaining risk of carbon leakage, financed from 25% of revenues from the sale of CBAM certificates.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/0418(COD) · Ordinary legislative procedure

Parliament adopted its position on 15 September 2026. Negotiations with the Council on a common text are under way.

Show the 6 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 12 February 2026 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 6 July 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 15 July 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 15 September 2026 (done)
  5. Negotiations with the Council · Talks opened 15 September 2026 (current stage)
  6. Published as law (to come)

Lead committee: ENVI · Rapporteur: Pascal CANFIN (Renew)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 25 connections: Running issue: EU competitiveness · Running issue: EU climate neutrality · Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: EU competitiveness

Running issue: EU climate neutrality

Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-09-15/2
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund”. Decision, 15 September 2026. votingId 196109, document A-10-2026-0202, reference 2025/0418(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-09-15/2 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-decision-2026-09-15-2,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-09-15/2}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-09-15/2},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 196109, document A-10-2026-0202, reference 2025/0418(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}