Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendments 89 + 105 + 108 (voted as one) to article 1

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures

Vote
Amendments 89 + 105 + 108 (voted as one) to article 1
Result
371 for · 260 against · 19 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:10
More facts (6)
Position
vote 38 of 72 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0201/2026 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 1 – § 1 – point 20; Regulation (EU) 2023/956 – Article 30 – § 6 – sub§ 2 – point b – after point v – Am 89= 105= 108=
Vote id
196260
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 371 for, 260 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 57 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 38Abst. 0No vote 6 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 112Abst. 2No vote 21 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 11Against 48Abst. 14No vote 5 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
EPPFor 164Against 7Abst. 0No vote 13 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 74Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 75Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 20Against 4Abst. 3No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany020
Denmark010
Spain030
Finland030
France070
Greece030
Ireland030
Italy090
Netherlands010
Portugal010
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 650 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Dec 2025Monday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group (epizootic) Final vote Monday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group (epizootic)Other240 for, 194 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 55 %r · shared0.92 395 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 557 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 224 + 282 (voted as one) to recital 12 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 266 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.92 575 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment344 for, 256 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.91 573 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 248 + 310 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 273 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.91 580 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 7a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment347 for, 277 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 575 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 12 to paragraph 22 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment349 for, 287 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 584 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 8 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment319 for, 255 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 530 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 64 to paragraph 22 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment337 for, 311 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 586 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 251 + 313 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 270 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.91 579 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendments 89 + 105 + 108 (voted as one) to article 1 — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196260, reference 2025/0419(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196260 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196260,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendments 89 + 105 + 108 (voted as one) to article 1 — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196260}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196260},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196260, reference 2025/0419(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}