Skip to content

Member

Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU

EPP · Romania

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Romania
Roll-call participation
75.0 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
98.1 %ⓘ of 465 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
PNL Partidul Naţional Liberal
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
3 of 435 votesⓘ
Committees
AGRI (substitute), REGI, SANT (substitute)
Member id
197647
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

75.0 %

465 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−15.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

98.1 %

456 of 465 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (+2.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.7 %

3 of 435 votes where their group had a clear line

1 opposite (for ↔ against), 2 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.6 %

3 of 465 votes cast

Participation 75.0 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU75.0 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 98.1 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU98.1 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Paragraph 7 — part 2 437 for, 158 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 337 for, 246 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 456 for, 135 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Amendment 4 to paragraph 3 170 for, 396 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 150 for, 448 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 7 162 for, 312 against, 137 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 272 for, 290 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2025Need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in Belarus Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 567 for, 25 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2025Need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in Belarus Amendments 4 + 7 (voted as one) to paragraph 19 429 for, 205 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 Jan 2025EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Serbia Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 505 for, 90 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe The Left 196 for, 221 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PfE 108 for, 313 against, 6 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 322 for, 163 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 1, adding text after recital K 197 for, 342 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on recital K 328 for, 143 against, 85 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on citation 14 310 for, 183 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 9 to paragraph 1, after point ar 170 for, 364 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on paragraph 1, point an 319 for, 183 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 5 364 for, 120 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 4 356 for, 157 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 3 328 for, 178 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 2 366 for, 116 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 1 492 for, 43 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 17 to paragraph 1, point al 154 for, 379 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 8 to paragraph 1, point ak 204 for, 355 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 7 to paragraph 1, after point ag 152 for, 383 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, point ag 210 for, 332 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 5 to paragraph 1, after point af 167 for, 384 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point af — part 2 271 for, 268 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point af — part 1 549 for, 14 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point ae — part 2 264 for, 292 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point ae — part 1 424 for, 141 against, 1 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point w — part 2 355 for, 177 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point w — part 1 395 for, 151 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 5 384 for, 158 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 382 for, 159 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 3 267 for, 297 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 276 for, 287 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 1 421 for, 89 against, 61 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point r — part 2 389 for, 153 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point r — part 1 551 for, 8 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point q 198 for, 359 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 3 to paragraph 1, after point q 202 for, 361 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 3 398 for, 142 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 2 362 for, 158 against, 47 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 400 for, 148 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 14 to paragraph 1, after point i 199 for, 318 against, 46 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 12 to paragraph 1, point h 164 for, 398 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 2 to paragraph 1, after point a 169 for, 388 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point a — part 2 356 for, 172 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 21 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania97 % of 4 069 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany97 % of 3 159 shared89 %
Pekka TOVERI EPPFinland97 % of 3 702 shared89 %
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU EPPRomania96 % of 3 798 shared89 %
Gheorghe FALCĂ EPPRomania96 % of 3 657 shared89 %
Sven SIMON EPPGermany96 % of 3 467 shared89 %
Sandra KALNIETE EPPLatvia96 % of 3 998 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania96 % of 3 526 shared89 %
Jüri RATAS EPPEstonia96 % of 4 153 shared89 %
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA EPPRomania96 % of 3 731 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia88 % of 4 034 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania87 % of 3 683 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium87 % of 4 029 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland87 % of 3 362 shared82 %
Olivier CHASTEL RenewBelgium87 % of 3 928 shared82 %
Anouk VAN BRUG RenewNetherlands86 % of 2 896 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands86 % of 3 597 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia86 % of 3 487 shared82 %
Elsi KATAINEN RenewFinland86 % of 4 186 shared82 %
Sophie WILMÈS RenewBelgium86 % of 2 950 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Public HealthSANT CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with the Federative Republic of BrazilD-BR DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with MercosurDMER DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assemblySubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Cohesion Policy and Outermost RegionsIG10-08 Intergroup / working groupMember25 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on Sky and SpaceIG10-21 Intergroup / working groupMember27 Feb 2025now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeMember20 Jan 202526 Apr 2026
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeMember19 Jul 202419 Jan 2025

Show all 10 seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

29 contributions recorded, 22 written statements; 1 on behalf of their group; 11 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 29 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 125

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026Circular Economy Act: regulatory barriers to secondary raw materials E-10-2026-003654Written questionwith 29 co-authorsNot yet answered
24 Jun 2026Addressing barriers to the recycling of critical raw materials E-10-2026-002606Written question11 Sept 2026
24 Jun 2026Cybersecurity concerns regarding Anthropic’s termination of access for EU users E-10-2026-002609Written questionNot yet answered
24 Jun 2026Regulatory fragmentation and uptake of 5G standalone across Member States E-10-2026-002607Written question1 Sept 2026
24 Jun 2026Mobilising private investment for critical minerals projects E-10-2026-002608Written question21 Aug 2026
24 Jun 2026Extension of the Prüm II Regulation to non-EU countries E-10-2026-002605Written question31 Aug 2026
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0304Motion for a resolutionwith 32 co-authors—
14 Jun 2026European framework for payments to farmers who provide measurable ecosystem services E-10-2026-002445Written questionwith 1 co-author28 Aug 2026
11 Jun 2026Small modular reactors E-10-2026-002408Written questionwith 25 co-authors20 Aug 2026
9 Jun 2026Strengthening prevention, mental well-being and healthy ageing through improved hearing health E-10-2026-002380Written questionwith 15 co-authors21 Aug 2026

Show all 125 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 165

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
16 Sept 2026Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 REGI-AM-792057 REGI12
11 Sept 2026Modernised rules for patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare SANT-AM-792154 SANT21
11 Sept 2026Modernised rules for patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare SANT-AM-792014 SANT42
7 Sept 2026Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 REGI-AM-792058 REGI21
27 Aug 2026Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791869 REGI47
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791875 REGI16
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilienceand cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791870 REGI7
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791872 REGI17
17 Jul 2026Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agriculture AGRI-AM-791100 AGRI33
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790955 AGRI11

Show all 165 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Romania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU”. Member record. memberId 197647. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197647?page=109&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197647. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197647?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197647,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197647?page=109&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197647?page=109&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197647. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197647. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}