Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 49 — part 1

Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024

Vote
Paragraph 49 — part 1
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 2 Apr 2025
Result
398 for · 249 against · 18 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
2 April 2025, 14:12
More facts (6)
Position
vote 88 of 178 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: Patriots, ECR
Official label
A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49/1
Text
Report A-10-2025-0011
Dossier
2024/2082(INI)
Vote id
174740
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 398 for, 249 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 60 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Reaffirms that, in order to become a credible geopolitical player, the EU should reform its process for decision-making on the CFSP/CSDP”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 40Abst. 1No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 116Against 7Abst. 4No vote 9 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
RenewFor 66Against 5Abst. 1No vote 3 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
EPPFor 142Against 25Abst. 4No vote 17 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
ECRFor 1Against 70Abst. 4No vote 5 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 0Against 79Abst. 0No vote 7 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 19Against 4Abst. 1No vote 2 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.69
No groupFor 1Against 19Abst. 3No vote 5 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark010
Spain040
Finland021
France090
Greece130
Ireland030
Italy270
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 665 members

No vote recorded, 53

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 53 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 58 — part 3 White paper on the future of European defenceSplit vote373 for, 279 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 627 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceSplit vote420 for, 222 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.79 623 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 80 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Split vote347 for, 289 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by EPP, ECR, Patriotsr · shared0.79 603 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 541 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 121 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment358 for, 208 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 538 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.79 534 voters
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 9 — part 1 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandSplit vote319 for, 190 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by Patriots, ECRr · shared0.79 501 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 93 — part 2 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Split vote394 for, 241 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.78 616 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 100 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment370 for, 196 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.78 541 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 9 — part 3 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote356 for, 218 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.78 570 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174740
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 49 — part 1 — Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024”. Vote, 2 April 2025. votingId 174740, reference 2024/2082(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174740 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-04-02/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-04-02-174740,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 49 — part 1 — Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-02},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174740}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174740},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 174740, reference 2024/2082(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02 (CC BY 4.0)}
}