Decision

Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024

Effect: Adopted
Result: 399 for · 198 against · 71 abstained roll call
Date: 2 April 2025, 14:01–14:22
Kind: Resolution

More facts (9)

Margin: by a clear majority
Text: Report A-10-2025-0011
Dossier: 2024/2082(INI)
Source: Committee report by Nicolás Pascual de la Parte
Topics: Foreign affairs Defence & security Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes: 178 votes · 48 roll calls · 38 amendments
Requested by: The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (2 split votes) · Renew (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · EPP (1 roll call, 10 split votes) · ECR (1 roll call, 7 split votes, 1 separate vote) · Patriots (1 roll call, 2 split votes, 1 separate vote) · ESN (1 roll call, 1 separate vote)
Sitting: Wednesday 2 April 2025
Final vote: 174053

Margin: by a clear majority
Text: Report A-10-2025-0011
Dossier: 2024/2082(INI)
Source: Committee report by Nicolás Pascual de la Parte
Topics: Foreign affairs Defence & security Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes: 178 votes · 48 roll calls · 38 amendments
Requested by: The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (2 split votes) · Renew (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · EPP (1 roll call, 10 split votes) · ECR (1 roll call, 7 split votes, 1 separate vote) · Patriots (1 roll call, 2 split votes, 1 separate vote) · ESN (1 roll call, 1 separate vote)
Sitting: Wednesday 2 April 2025
Final vote: 174053

Cite this page Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Votes on this decision

Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Adopted by a clear majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 38 amendments (9 adopted, 29 rejected) and 139 parts of the text voted on separately (75 adopted, 58 rejected, 6 lapsed).

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by The Left, Patriots and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 1	Against 43	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 46	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.97
Greens	For 36	Against 8	Abst. 7	No vote 2 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.56
S&D	For 120	Against 6	Abst. 3	No vote 7 of 136	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.90
Renew	For 69	Against 0	Abst. 4	No vote 2 of 75	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.92
EPP	For 158	Against 4	Abst. 8	No vote 18 of 188	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.89
ECR	For 14	Against 22	Abst. 39	No vote 5 of 80	Majority line Abstained	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.28
Patriots	For 0	Against 72	Abst. 7	No vote 7 of 86	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.87
ESN	For 0	Against 23	Abst. 1	No vote 2 of 26	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.94
No group	For 1	Against 20	Abst. 2	No vote 5 of 28	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 49

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

The Left line Against · 1 voted for of 44 who voted
Voted for (1)
- Merja KYLLÖNEN Finland
Greens line For · 8 voted against, 7 abstained of 51 who voted
Voted against (8)
- Ana MIRANDA PAZ Spain
- Benedetta SCUDERI Italy
- Cristina GUARDA Italy
- Diana RIBA I GINER Spain
- Ignazio Roberto MARINO Italy
- Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ Spain
- Leoluca ORLANDO Italy
- Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ Spain
Abstained (7)
- David CORMAND France
- Gordan BOSANAC Croatia
- Majdouline SBAI France
- Mélissa CAMARA France
- Mounir SATOURI France
- Saskia BRICMONT Belgium
- Tilly METZ Luxembourg
S&D line For · 6 voted against, 3 abstained of 129 who voted
Voted against (6)
- Alex AGIUS SALIBA Malta
- Birgit SIPPEL Germany
- Cecilia STRADA Italy
- Daniel ATTARD Malta
- Marco TARQUINIO Italy
- Thomas BAJADA Malta
Abstained (3)
- Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN Ireland
- Kristian VIGENIN Bulgaria
- Tsvetelina PENKOVA Bulgaria
Renew line For · 4 abstained of 73 who voted
Abstained (4)
- Barry ANDREWS Ireland
- Barry COWEN Ireland
- Billy KELLEHER Ireland
- Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ Ireland
EPP line For · 4 voted against, 8 abstained of 170 who voted
Voted against (4)
- Christophe GOMART France
- Dirk GOTINK Netherlands
- Laurent CASTILLO France
- Nadine MORANO France
Abstained (8)
- Céline IMART France
- David CASA Malta
- François-Xavier BELLAMY France
- Henrik DAHL Denmark
- Isabelle LE CALLENNEC France
- Jessika VAN LEEUWEN Netherlands
- Peter AGIUS Malta
- Sander SMIT Netherlands
Patriots line Against · 7 abstained of 79 who voted
Abstained (7)
- Afroditi LATINOPOULOU Greece
- Hermann TERTSCH Spain
- Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA Spain
- Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL Spain
- Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN Spain
- Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN Spain
- Vilis KRIŠTOPANS Latvia
ESN line Against · 1 abstained of 24 who voted
Abstained (1)
- Petras GRAŽULIS Lithuania

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)

Members' votes by country. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
Country	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Cohesion
Austria	14	6	0	0	0.55
Belgium	15	5	1	1	0.57
Bulgaria	8	3	3	3	0.36
Cyprus	4	2	0	0	—
Czechia	9	12	0	0	0.36
Germany	62	25	0	8	0.57
Denmark	11	2	2	0	0.60
Estonia	6	0	1	0	—
Spain	42	9	7	2	0.59
Finland	12	2	1	0	0.70
France	27	43	7	4	0.34
Greece	9	7	4	1	0.17
Croatia	9	0	2	1	0.73
Hungary	2	11	0	8	0.77
Ireland	6	3	5	0	0.14
Italy	25	23	22	6	0.04
Lithuania	9	0	2	0	0.73
Luxembourg	4	0	2	0	—
Latvia	8	0	1	0	—
Malta	0	3	2	1	—
Netherlands	20	7	3	1	0.50
Poland	27	22	0	4	0.33
Portugal	15	3	0	3	0.75
Romania	24	2	3	4	0.74
Sweden	15	2	3	1	0.63
Slovenia	9	0	0	0	—
Slovakia	7	6	0	2	0.31

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 668 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. **Speeches**: how many times they took the floor. **Final vote**: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
Member	Group	Speeches	Spoke	Final vote
Roberta METSOLA Malta	EPP	Speeches1	2 Apr 2025 (verbatim report, official site)	No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 178

In voting order. **Result**: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
1	Separate vote on paragraph 1	Show of hands	Rejected
2	Amendment 65 — part 1 of 2 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 1 – Am 65 Part voted on: “Stresses the seriousness of the threats to the security of the European continent, which have reached a level unprecedented since the Second World War; expresses deep concern at the rise of geopolitical fractures, new and renewed imperialist ambitions for domination by authoritarian powers, systemic rivalry of great powers, nationalist unilateralism, the spread of terrorism, including extremist right wing and jihadist terrorism,”	Roll call	237 for, 416 against, 12 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left; split: EPP
3	Amendment 65 — part 2 of 2 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 1 – Am 65 Part voted on: “forced displacement of civilians and deliberate targeting of civilian persons and infrastructure, and the primary and growing use of force and violence by certain malicious actors to promote their political and economic objectives and interests or to resolve disputes;”	Roll call	448 for, 169 against, 42 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: The Left; split: EPP

Show the other 177 votesShow the other 175 votes

Votes on this decision, continued
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
2	Amendment 65 — part 1 of 2 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 1 – Am 65 Part voted on: “Stresses the seriousness of the threats to the security of the European continent, which have reached a level unprecedented since the Second World War; expresses deep concern at the rise of geopolitical fractures, new and renewed imperialist ambitions for domination by authoritarian powers, systemic rivalry of great powers, nationalist unilateralism, the spread of terrorism, including extremist right wing and jihadist terrorism,”	Roll call	237 for, 416 against, 12 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left; split: EPP
3	Amendment 65 — part 2 of 2 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 1 – Am 65 Part voted on: “forced displacement of civilians and deliberate targeting of civilian persons and infrastructure, and the primary and growing use of force and violence by certain malicious actors to promote their political and economic objectives and interests or to resolve disputes;”	Roll call	448 for, 169 against, 42 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: The Left; split: EPP

Votes on this decision, continued
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
4	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 1	Show of hands	Adopted
5	Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 1 – Am 66	Roll call	85 for, 517 against, 63 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
6	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 1	Show of hands	Rejected
7	Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 1 – Am 68	Roll call	81 for, 567 against, 14 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
8	Amendment 69 to paragraph 2 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 2 – Am 69	Roll call	112 for, 488 against, 59 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
9	Separate vote on paragraph 3	Show of hands	Rejected
10	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 3	Show of hands	Adopted
11	Separate vote on paragraph 4	Show of hands	Rejected
12	Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 4 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 4 – Am 70	Roll call	512 for, 84 against, 73 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: The Left
13	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 4	Show of hands	Rejected
14	Separate vote on paragraph 5	Show of hands	Rejected
15	Separate vote on paragraph 5	Show of hands	Rejected
16	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 5	Show of hands	Rejected
17	Separate vote on paragraph 7	Show of hands	Rejected
18	Separate vote on paragraph 7	Show of hands	Rejected
19	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 7	Show of hands	Adopted
20	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 7	Show of hands	Adopted
21	Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 7 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 7 – Am 73	Roll call	224 for, 355 against, 88 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
22	Separate vote on paragraph 8	Show of hands	Rejected
23	Separate vote on paragraph 9	Show of hands	Adopted
24	Amendment 125 to paragraph 9 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 9 – Am 125	Roll call	90 for, 534 against, 46 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ECR
25	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 9	Show of hands	Adopted
26	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 9	Show of hands	Adopted
27	Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 9 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 9 – Am 21	Roll call	489 for, 108 against, 71 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: ECR
28	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 9	Show of hands	Adopted
29	Amendment 1 to paragraph 10 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 10 – Am 1	Roll call	79 for, 541 against, 40 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ESN
30	Separate vote on paragraph 10	Show of hands	Adopted
31	Amendment 74 to paragraph 10 — part 1 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 10 – Am 74/1 Part voted on: ‘Calls for the EU and its Member States to accelerate their commitments made in the Versailles Declaration and to assume greater responsibility for their defence and security, including by achieving greater strategic autonomy and bolstering defence and deterrence capabilities, in particular on its eastern borders; expresses dismay concerning the US administration’s policy of appeasing Russia and targeting its allies;’	Roll call	230 for, 424 against, 14 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left; split: EPP
32	Amendment 74 to paragraph 10 — part 2 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 10 – Am 74/2 Part voted on: “stresses that NATO and the transatlantic partnership with the United States remain the cornerstones of European collective defence, but are now being undermined by the policies pursued by the United States”	Roll call	113 for, 483 against, 60 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left; split: EPP
33	Separate vote on paragraph 10	Roll call	0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
34	Separate vote on paragraph 10	Show of hands	Adopted
35	Separate vote on paragraph 10	Show of hands	Rejected
36	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 10	Show of hands	Rejected
37	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 10	Show of hands	Rejected
38	Amendment 77 to paragraph 11 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 11 – Am 77	Roll call	49 for, 548 against, 65 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
39	Separate vote on paragraph 11	Show of hands	Rejected
40	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 12	Show of hands	Adopted
41	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 12	Show of hands	Adopted
42	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 12	Show of hands	Adopted
43	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 12	Show of hands	Adopted
44	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 12	Show of hands	Rejected
45	Amendment 79 to paragraph 13 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 13 – Am 79	Roll call	113 for, 517 against, 36 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
46	Separate vote on paragraph 13	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: ECR, EPP
47	Separate vote on paragraph 13	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested bysplit: ECR, EPP
48	Separate vote on paragraph 13	Show of hands	Lapsed	Requested bysplit: ECR, EPP
49	Separate vote on paragraph 13	Show of hands	Lapsed	Requested bysplit: ECR, EPP
50	Separate vote on paragraph 13	Show of hands	Lapsed	Requested bysplit: ECR, EPP
51	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 13	Show of hands	Adopted
52	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 13	Show of hands	Adopted
53	Separate vote on paragraph 14	Show of hands	Rejected
54	Separate vote on paragraph 15	Counted	319 for, 283 against, 65 abstained Adopted
55	Separate vote on paragraph 15	Show of hands	Rejected
56	Separate vote on paragraph 17	Show of hands	Rejected
57	Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 17 — part 1 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 17 – Am 30/1 Part voted on: ‘Disagrees with the Hungarian Government’s policy towards Russia, its use of vetoes against EU sanctions and its blocking of EU financial and defence aid for Ukraine; believes that the actions of the Hungarian Government undermine unity and solidarity in Europe;’	Roll call	459 for, 120 against, 86 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: ECR, EPP; split: ECR
58	Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 17 — part 2 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 17 – Am 30/2 Part voted on: “recalls that, under the EPF, countries are entitled to financial compensation for equipment deliveries to Ukraine and underlines, in the light of this, that the current blocks on reimbursements to 25 Member States, from which Poland stands out with a total of EUR 450 million in unpaid compensation, need to be removed immediately;”	Roll call	494 for, 134 against, 30 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: ECR, EPP; split: ECR
59	Separate vote on paragraph 18	Show of hands	Rejected
60	Amendment 137 to paragraph 18 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 18 – Am 137	Roll call	115 for, 531 against, 22 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
61	Separate vote on paragraph 19	Show of hands	Rejected
62	Separate vote on paragraph 20	Show of hands	Rejected
63	Separate vote on paragraph 21	Show of hands	Rejected
64	Separate vote on paragraph 22	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested byseparate: ESN
65	Separate vote on paragraph 24	Show of hands	Rejected
66	Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 24 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 24 – Am 2	Roll call	183 for, 451 against, 28 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ECR, ESN
67	Amendment 84, adding text after paragraph 24 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 24 – Am 84	Roll call	216 for, 406 against, 39 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
68	Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 24 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 24 – Am 119	Roll call	310 for, 341 against, 18 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ECR
69	Separate vote on paragraph 26	Show of hands	Rejected
70	Separate vote on paragraph 27	Show of hands	Rejected
71	Separate vote on paragraph 29	Counted	265 for, 298 against, 104 abstained Rejected	Requested byseparate: ECR
72	Separate vote on paragraph 29	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested byseparate: ECR
73	Separate vote on paragraph 29	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested byseparate: ECR
74	Separate vote on paragraph 30	Counted	340 for, 288 against, 43 abstained Adopted
75	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 30	Show of hands	Adopted
76	Amendment 130 to paragraph 31 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 31 – Am 130	Roll call	187 for, 456 against, 23 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ECR
77	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 32	Show of hands	Rejected
78	Separate vote on paragraph 33	Show of hands	Rejected
79	Amendment 131 to paragraph 33 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 33 – Am 131	Roll call	198 for, 444 against, 29 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ECR
80	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 40	Show of hands	Adopted
81	Separate vote on paragraph 42	Show of hands	Adopted
82	Separate vote on paragraph 43	Show of hands	Adopted
83	Amendment 132, adding text after paragraph 44 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 44 – Am 132	Roll call	463 for, 169 against, 37 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: ECR
84	Separate vote on paragraph 47	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested byseparate: Patriots
85	Amendment 85 to paragraph 49 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49 – Am 85	Roll call	263 for, 374 against, 31 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
86	Amendment 140 to paragraph 49 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49 – Am 140	Roll call	219 for, 428 against, 14 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
87	Amendment 133 to paragraph 49 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49 – Am 133	Roll call	206 for, 442 against, 15 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ECR
88	Paragraph 49 — part 1 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49/1 Part voted on: “Reaffirms that, in order to become a credible geopolitical player, the EU should reform its process for decision-making on the CFSP/CSDP”	Roll call	398 for, 249 against, 18 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Patriots, ECR
89	Paragraph 49 — part 2 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49/2 Part voted on: “and underlines, in this regard, that institutional reflections on lifting the requirement for unanimity in this process should be considered;”	Roll call	373 for, 275 against, 12 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: EPP, Patriots; split: Patriots, ECR
90	Paragraph 49 — part 3 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49/3 Part voted on: ‘recalls that the EU Treaty framework already allows a number of different institutional forms of cooperation in the field of foreign, security and defence policy and notes with regret that the potential for fast action in this field, as provided for in the ‘passerelle clauses’ of the TEU, has been used only in a very limited manner; calls on the Council to consider all possibilities to strengthen and deepen its process for decision-making on the CFSP/CSDP with a view to realising the untapped potential within the Treaties; reiterates its call for the Council to gradually switch to qualified majority voting for decisions on the CFSP and CSDP, at least in those areas that do not have military implications; suggests, furthermore, that the Council pursue making full use of the ‘passerelle clauses’ and the scope of articles that enhance EU solidarity and mutual assistance in the event of crises;’ without the words: ‘reiterates its call for the Council to gradually switch to qualified majority voting for decisions on the CFSP and CSDP, at least in those areas that do not have military implications;’	Roll call	386 for, 214 against, 64 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Patriots, ECR
91	Paragraph 49 — part 4 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49/4 Part voted on: “reiterates its call for the Council to gradually switch to qualified majority voting for decisions on the CFSP and CSDP, at least in those areas that do not have military implications;”	Roll call	369 for, 269 against, 23 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Patriots, ECR
92	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 53	Show of hands	Adopted
93	Paragraph 54 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘all EU Member States should urgently reach a level of defence spending, as a proportion of their GDP, that is significantly higher than NATO’s current target of 2 %;’”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
94	Paragraph 54 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
95	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 55	Show of hands	Adopted
96	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 55	Show of hands	Adopted
97	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 55	Show of hands	Adopted
98	Amendment 141 to paragraph 56 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 56 – Am 141	Roll call	306 for, 313 against, 26 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
99	Separate vote on paragraph 56	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Renew, EPP
100	Paragraph 56 — part 2 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 56/2 Part voted on: “those words”	Roll call	481 for, 112 against, 74 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: Renew; split: Renew, EPP
101	Separate vote on paragraph 57	Counted	176 for, 422 against, 61 abstained Rejected
102	Amendment 101, adding text after paragraph 57 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 57 – Am 101	Roll call	303 for, 289 against, 62 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: Renew
103	Amendment 121, adding text after paragraph 57 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 57 – Am 121	Roll call	409 for, 188 against, 66 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: ECR
104	Separate vote on paragraph 59	Show of hands	Rejected
105	Separate vote on paragraph 66	Counted	319 for, 316 against, 12 abstained Adopted
106	Amendment 86 to paragraph 68 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 68 – Am 86	Roll call	118 for, 516 against, 24 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
107	Separate vote on paragraph 68	Show of hands	Adopted
108	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 68	Show of hands	Adopted
109	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 68	Show of hands	Rejected
110	Amendment 88 to paragraph 69 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 69 – Am 88	Roll call	207 for, 445 against, 14 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
111	Paragraph 69 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘expresses serious concern, furthermore, about the ongoing military action by the Israeli Defence Forces in the Gaza Strip and in the West Bank; condemns the Israeli Defence Forces firing on the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), which is a grave violation of international law;’ and ‘reaffirms the essential stabilising role played by UNIFIL, to which 16 Member States contribute, in southern Lebanon; calls for immediate ceasefires in both Gaza and Lebanon, an end to the hostilities, the full and symmetrical implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701(2006) and the protection of the civilian populations;’”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: ECR, EPP
112	Paragraph 69 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “expresses serious concern, furthermore, about the ongoing military action by the Israeli Defence Forces in the Gaza Strip and in the West Bank; condemns the Israeli Defence Forces firing on the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), which is a grave violation of international law;”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: ECR, EPP
113	Paragraph 69 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “reaffirms the essential stabilising role played by UNIFIL, to which 16 Member States contribute, in southern Lebanon; calls for immediate ceasefires in both Gaza and Lebanon, an end to the hostilities, the full and symmetrical implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701(2006) and the protection of the civilian populations;”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: ECR, EPP
114	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 69	Show of hands	Adopted
115	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 74	Show of hands	Adopted
116	Separate vote on paragraph 75	Show of hands	Rejected
117	Separate vote on paragraph 75	Show of hands	Rejected
118	Paragraph 77 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘make ties with the new Syrian regime conditional on Russia’s full withdrawal from the country and prevent Russia from establishing new military bases elsewhere in the region; recognises, in this regard, the EU’s significant leverage with regard to Syria in terms of political recognition, the easing of sanctions, trade agreements, and financial support for reconstruction,’”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots
119	Paragraph 77 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots
120	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 83	Show of hands	Adopted
121	Separate vote on paragraph 85	Show of hands	Adopted
122	Separate vote on paragraph 88	Show of hands	Adopted
123	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 88	Show of hands	Adopted
124	Separate vote on paragraph 90	Show of hands	Adopted
125	Separate vote on paragraph 92	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: ECR
126	Paragraph 92 — part 2 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 92/2 Part voted on: “those words”	Roll call	458 for, 127 against, 75 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: ECR; split: ECR
127	Separate vote on paragraph 98	Show of hands	Rejected
128	Separate vote on paragraph 102	Show of hands	Adopted
129	Separate vote on paragraph 113	Show of hands	Rejected
130	Amendment 122 to paragraph 118 — part 1 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 118 – Am 122/1 Part voted on: “Condemns the continued malicious actions by Russia and Belarus aimed at destabilising the EU by pushing migrants to forcibly enter EU countries, constituting a hybrid attack; calls on the EU to review and update its policies concerning the strengthening of its external borders, including through the funding of physical barriers”	Roll call	361 for, 298 against, 7 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: ECR; split: EPP
131	Amendment 122 to paragraph 118 — part 2 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 118 – Am 122/2 Part voted on: “and naval blockades, in order to bolster the security of the Union as a whole;”	Roll call	224 for, 428 against, 12 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ECR; split: EPP
132	Paragraph 118 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Condemns the continued malicious actions by Russia and Belarus aimed at destabilising the EU”	Show of hands	Lapsed	Requested bysplit: Greens
133	Paragraph 118 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “by pushing migrants to forcibly enter EU countries, constituting a hybrid attack; calls on the EU to review and update its policies concerning the strengthening of its external borders in order to bolster the security of the Union as a whole;”	Show of hands	Lapsed	Requested bysplit: Greens
134	Separate vote on paragraph 124	Show of hands	Rejected
135	Amendment 145, adding text after paragraph 124 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 124 – Am 145	Roll call	113 for, 489 against, 58 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
136	Amendment 146 to paragraph 125 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 125 – Am 146	Roll call	322 for, 305 against, 7 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: Patriots
137	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 127	Show of hands	Adopted
138	Separate vote on paragraph 129	Show of hands	Rejected
139	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 129	Counted	263 for, 317 against, 83 abstained Rejected
140	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 129	Counted	431 for, 178 against, 50 abstained Adopted
141	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 132	Show of hands	Rejected
142	Separate vote on paragraph 135	Show of hands	Rejected
143	Amendment 147 to paragraph 135 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 135 – Am 147	Roll call	198 for, 457 against, 5 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
144	Separate vote on paragraph 137	Show of hands	Rejected
145	Separate vote on paragraph 140	Show of hands	Rejected
146	Separate vote on paragraph 140	Show of hands	Rejected
147	Separate vote on paragraph 140	Show of hands	Rejected
148	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 141	Show of hands	Adopted
149	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 141	Show of hands	Adopted
150	Amendment 148 to paragraph 143 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 143 – Am 148	Roll call	279 for, 318 against, 48 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
151	Amendment 96, adding text after paragraph 145 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 145 – Am 96	Roll call	217 for, 430 against, 11 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
152	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 145	Show of hands	Rejected
153	Separate vote on subheading 28	Show of hands	Adopted
154	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 149	Show of hands	Adopted
155	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 150	Show of hands	Adopted
156	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 150	Show of hands	Rejected
157	Amendment 149 to paragraph 151 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 151 – Am 149	Roll call	180 for, 365 against, 116 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
158	Separate vote on paragraph 153	Show of hands	Adopted
159	Separate vote on paragraph 155	Show of hands	Rejected
160	Separate vote on paragraph 158	Show of hands	Adopted
161	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 158	Show of hands	Adopted
162	Amendment 61, adding text after citation 3 A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – after citation 3 – Am 61	Roll call	105 for, 366 against, 190 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
163	Separate vote on citation 35	Show of hands	Adopted
164	Vote on text inserted after citation 58	Show of hands	Adopted
165	Separate vote on recital A	Show of hands	Rejected
166	Separate vote on recital B	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested byseparate: ESN
167	Vote on text inserted after recital B	Show of hands	Adopted
168	Recital C — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘instrumentalisation of migration’”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Greens
169	Recital C — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Greens
170	Vote on text inserted after recital D	Show of hands	Adopted
171	Separate vote on recital E	Show of hands	Rejected
172	Separate vote on recital L	Show of hands	Rejected
173	Vote on text inserted after recital M	Show of hands	Rejected
174	Vote on text inserted after recital P	Show of hands	Rejected
175	Separate vote on recital X	Show of hands	Adopted
176	Vote on text inserted after recital AA	Show of hands	Rejected
177	Vote on text inserted after recital AC	Show of hands	Rejected
178	Final vote — text as a whole A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)	Roll call	399 for, 198 against, 71 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by The Left, Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots, ESN · split votes by Greens (2), Renew, EPP (10), ECR (7), Patriots (2) · separate votes by ECR, Patriots, ESN.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0011

What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted its annual report on the implementation of the common security and defence policy, setting out its assessment and recommendations.

The report addresses the EU's response to security threats since Russia's war against Ukraine and other crises, and proposes ways to strengthen defence capabilities.

It calls for progress in institutional decision-making, joint development of military capabilities, and financing.

Read the text · Report a problem

The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution on the implementation of the common security and defence policy (CSDP) assesses threats and EU responses, covering Ukraine, defence industry, CSDP missions, partnerships, and preparedness.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/2082(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 2 April 2025. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier

Referred to committee · 28 November 2024 (done)
Committee work · Report adopted 30 January 2025 (done)
Tabled for plenary · 10 February 2025 (done)
Plenary vote · Adopted 2 April 2025 (done)
Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: AFET · Author: Nicolás PASCUAL DE LA PARTE (EPP)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 31 connections: Running issue: Common foreign and security policy · Running issue: EU defence readiness · Running issue: EU defence and security partnerships · Running issue: Russia's war against Ukraine · Other decisions of the part-session on AFET dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: Common foreign and security policy

Issue Common foreign and security policy Running issue · EU initiative 20 May 2026
Decision Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly Resolution · report by Andrey Kovatchev 20 May 2026 Adopted
Decision Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025 Resolution · report by Francisco Assis 21 Jan 2026 Adopted
Decision Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025 Resolution · report by Thijs Reuten 21 Jan 2026 Adopted
Decision Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025 Resolution · report by David McAllister 21 Jan 2026 Adopted
Decision Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024 Resolution · report by David McAllister 2 Apr 2025 Adopted

Running issue: EU defence readiness

Issue EU defence readiness Running issue · EU initiative 16 Sept 2026
Decision Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V) New EU law · report by Sven Mikser, Pierfrancesco Maran, Aura Salla 16 Sept 2026 Passed
Decision Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V) New EU law · report by Lucia Yar, Henrik Dahl 16 Sept 2026 Passed
Decision Simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and simplification of security and defence procurement (Omnibus V) New EU law · report by Pekka Toveri, Anna-Maja Henriksson 16 Sept 2026 Passed
Decision Flagship European defence projects of common interest Resolution · report by Lucia Annunziata 11 Mar 2026 Adopted
Decision Tackling barriers to the single market for defence Resolution · report by Tobias Cremer 11 Mar 2026 Adopted

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-04-02/8
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024”. Decision, 2 April 2025. votingId 174053, document A-10-2025-0011, reference 2024/2082(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-04-02/8 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-04-02/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-decision-2025-04-02-8,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-02},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-04-02/8}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-04-02/8},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 174053, document A-10-2025-0011, reference 2024/2082(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02 (CC BY 4.0)}
}