Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 74 — part 1 to paragraph 10

Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024

Vote
Amendment 74 — part 1 to paragraph 10
Result
230 for · 424 against · 14 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
2 April 2025, 14:05
More facts (6)
Position
vote 31 of 178 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 10 – Am 74/1
Vote id
174711
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 230 for, 424 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘Calls for the EU and its Member States to accelerate their commitments made in the Versailles Declaration and to assume greater responsibility for their defence and security, including by achieving greater strategic autonomy and bolstering defence and deterrence capabilities, in particular on its eastern borders; expresses dismay concerning the US administration’s policy of appeasing Russia and targeting its allies;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 28Against 8Abst. 8No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.45
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 123Against 1Abst. 3No vote 9 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 22Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.55
EPPFor 5Against 166Abst. 1No vote 16 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 0Against 73Abst. 1No vote 6 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 80Abst. 0No vote 6 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 2 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 1Against 21Abst. 1No vote 5 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium002
Cyprus100
Germany202
Denmark100
Spain103
Finland300
France900
Greece400
Ireland300
Italy270
Portugal011
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 668 members

No vote recorded, 50

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 50 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 36 to paragraph 65 Public procurementAmendment225 for, 419 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 604 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 34 to paragraph 65 Public procurementAmendment223 for, 411 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greens, ECRr · shared0.87 599 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment231 for, 350 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 549 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Amendment 26 to paragraph 23 Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionAmendment219 for, 421 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 625 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 61, adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 540 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 30 to paragraph 8 — part 1 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment246 for, 379 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 667 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment194 for, 399 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 554 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 215 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment211 for, 423 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 592 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 57 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment191 for, 445 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 620 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 274 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment198 for, 430 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 597 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 74 — part 1 to paragraph 10 — Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024”. Vote, 2 April 2025. votingId 174711, reference 2024/2082(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174711 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-04-02/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-04-02-174711,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 74 — part 1 to paragraph 10 — Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-02},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174711}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174711},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 174711, reference 2024/2082(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02 (CC BY 4.0)}
}