Skip to content

Member

Asger CHRISTENSEN

Renew · Denmark

Group
Renew
Country
Denmark
Roll-call participation
92.3 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
91.5 %ⓘ of 568 votes where the group had a line · Renew median 93.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
V Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
36 of 528 votesⓘ
Committees
AGRI, PECH, TRAN (substitute)
Member id
197558
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.3 %

572 of 620 final votes while in office

Renew median: 91.5 % (+0.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

91.5 %

520 of 568 votes where their group had a line

Renew median: 93.6 % (−2.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

6.8 %

36 of 528 votes where their group had a clear line

19 opposite (for ↔ against), 17 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

3.3 %

19 of 572 votes cast

Participation 92.3 % — Renew median 91.5 %, 76 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 76 members of the Renew with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Asger CHRISTENSEN92.3 %
Renew median91.5 %
Lowest in the group64.4 %
Highest in the group99.7 %
Members76
With majority line 91.5 % — Renew median 93.6 %, 76 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 76 members of the Renew with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Asger CHRISTENSEN91.5 %
Renew median93.6 %
Lowest in the group79.8 %
Highest in the group97.6 %
Members76
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Renew; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
23 Oct 2025Dates of application and transitional provisions for chemical products Proposal to reject the text 93 for, 431 against, 7 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 458 for, 18 against, 84 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections Recital Q — part 2 476 for, 42 against, 65 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 12 183 for, 402 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections Paragraph 9 — part 2 450 for, 153 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedy Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 457 for, 103 against, 72 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedy Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 18 111 for, 213 against, 311 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedy Amendment 10 to paragraph 12 548 for, 14 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedy Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 2 312 for, 281 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 310 for, 277 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Separate vote on recital D 464 for, 136 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 24 257 for, 358 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 23 263 for, 349 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Separate vote on paragraph 12 334 for, 286 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Separate vote on paragraph 10 381 for, 236 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Paragraph 4 — part 6 462 for, 162 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Paragraph 4 — part 5 344 for, 227 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Paragraph 4 — part 4 326 for, 272 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Paragraph 4 — part 3 321 for, 270 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Paragraph 4 — part 2 411 for, 169 against, 63 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Paragraph 4 — part 1 485 for, 152 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Final vote — text as a wholeDischarge decision adopted 476 for, 99 against, 72 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 1 to recital A 180 for, 449 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 15 182 for, 437 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 10 191 for, 441 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 6 198 for, 429 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council Final vote — text as a wholeDischarge decision adopted 441 for, 125 against, 73 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council Paragraph 17 — part 2 445 for, 178 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 16 — part 2 334 for, 285 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 16 — part 1 459 for, 161 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council Amendment 1 to paragraph 16 461 for, 173 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Final vote — text as a wholeResolution adopted 384 for, 202 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 15 181 for, 451 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 155, adding text after paragraph 86 119 for, 471 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 160, adding text after paragraph 84 188 for, 451 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 168, adding text after paragraph 82 71 for, 542 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 159, adding text after paragraph 82 84 for, 483 against, 76 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 169, adding text after paragraph 82 72 for, 527 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 82 282 for, 317 against, 39 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 158, adding text after paragraph 81 141 for, 445 against, 67 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 157, adding text after paragraph 79 182 for, 412 against, 59 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 173, adding text after paragraph 79 284 for, 314 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 172, adding text after paragraph 79 254 for, 331 against, 72 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 178 to paragraph 79, after point l 249 for, 275 against, 127 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 177 to paragraph 79, after point l 285 for, 306 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 151 to paragraph 79, after point l 169 for, 443 against, 35 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 26 to paragraph 79, after point j 321 for, 240 against, 84 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 150 to paragraph 79, after point g 161 for, 448 against, 48 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 147 to paragraph 78 171 for, 462 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 154, adding text after paragraph 77 131 for, 456 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 7 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Renew

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Morten LØKKEGAARD RenewDenmark98 % of 5 131 shared92 %
Taner KABILOV changed group ECRBulgaria93 % of 380 shared92 %
Elena YONCHEVA changed group ECRBulgaria91 % of 226 shared92 %
Jeannette BALJEU RenewNetherlands91 % of 4 770 shared92 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland91 % of 4 261 shared92 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania90 % of 4 865 shared92 %
Anouk VAN BRUG RenewNetherlands90 % of 4 136 shared92 %
Andreas GLÜCK RenewGermany90 % of 3 671 shared92 %
Elsi KATAINEN RenewFinland90 % of 5 344 shared92 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands90 % of 4 098 shared92 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Tom BERENDSEN Former memberEPPNetherlands88 % of 3 434 shared82 %
Daniel CASPARY Former memberEPPGermany87 % of 3 043 shared82 %
Aura SALLA EPPFinland86 % of 4 586 shared82 %
Pekka TOVERI EPPFinland86 % of 4 865 shared82 %
Christine SCHNEIDER Former memberEPPGermany86 % of 3 505 shared82 %
Jeroen LENAERS EPPNetherlands86 % of 5 441 shared82 %
Isabel WISELER-LIMA EPPLuxembourg86 % of 5 287 shared82 %
Dennis RADTKE EPPGermany86 % of 4 409 shared82 %
Ingeborg TER LAAK EPPNetherlands86 % of 5 423 shared82 %
Sven SIMON EPPGermany86 % of 4 412 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on FisheriesPECH CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with South AfricaD-ZA DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America, including the EU-Central America Association Parliamentary CommitteeDCAM DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assemblySubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Sustainable LivestockIG10-15 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on the Welfare and Conservation of AnimalsIG10-27 Intergroup / working groupMember8 Jan 2025now

Show all 11 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
EU Emissions Trading System and market stability reserve: competitiveness and cost-effective decarbonisationShadow rapporteur for an opinionTRAN16 Sept 2026
Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Fisheries Policy, to the European Ocean Pact and of the Union’s maritime and aquaculture policy as part of the National and Regional Partnership Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP Fund] for the period from 2028 to 2034Shadow rapporteurPECH10 Sept 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationTRAN28 Jul 2026
Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Fisheries Policy, to the European Ocean Pact and of the Union’s maritime and aquaculture policy as part of the National and Regional Partnership Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP Fund] for the period from 2028 to 2034Shadow rapporteurPECH20 May 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAGRI5 May 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationPECH4 May 2026
Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activitiesShadow rapporteur for an opinionAGRI26 Jan 2026
Amending Regulations (EC) No 1272/2008, (EC) No 1223/2009 and (EU) 2019/1009 as regards simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsShadow rapporteur for an opinionAGRI9 Dec 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAGRI1 Sept 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationTRAN24 Jun 2025

Show all 17 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

17 contributions recorded, 1 written statement; 2 on behalf of their group; 16 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
9 Jul 2026Evaluation of the common fisheries policy and follow-up (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2026The resilience of the European transport sector and the need to ensure the supply of essential goods amid ongoing geopolitical instability (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 May 2026Periodic roadworthiness tests and technical roadside inspection (Roadworthiness package) (A10-0139/2026 - Jens Gieseke) (vote) on behalf of RenewSpeech · 1 minRead
19 May 2026Presentation of the Fertilisers Action Plan (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
18 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
30 Apr 2026How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases? (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Mar 2026Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors (debate) StatementRead
12 Feb 2026Cooperation among enforcement authorities regarding unfair trading practices in the agri-food supply chain (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
15 Dec 2025Amending certain CAP Regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
26 Nov 2025Fishing opportunities 2026: ensuring the sustainability of fish populations, marine ecosystems and coastal communities Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 17 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 48

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
16 Sept 2026Administrative burdens on small businesses and harmonisation of registration and reporting requirements for packaging under the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation E-10-2026-003689Written questionNot yet answered
16 Sept 2026Low European gas stocks, high energy prices and opportunities to boost the EU’s energy supply and domestic gas production E-10-2026-003712Written questionNot yet answered
15 Sept 2026Member States’ assessment obligations and food security, strategic autonomy and sustainable production considerations in relation to the Water Framework Directive E-10-2026-003678Written questionNot yet answered
9 Sept 2026European fire safety standards and national documentation requirements P-10-2026-003585Priority written questionNot yet answered
9 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up B-10-2026-0386Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors—
25 Aug 2026EUDR: availability of soy for animal feed in the EU E-10-2026-003326Written questionNot yet answered
11 Aug 2026Protein action plan E-10-2026-003256Written questionNot yet answered
11 Aug 2026Sampling in mussel fisheries under the Fisheries Control Regulation P-10-2026-003255Priority written question18 Sept 2026
19 Jun 2026Proportionality of the EU Deforestation Regulation in the light of the Commission’s own cited scientific evidence E-10-2026-002542Written questionwith 2 co-authors25 Aug 2026
1 Jun 2026Recognition of carbon removals in ESRS E1 climate targets P-10-2026-002208Priority written question1 Jul 2026

Show all 48 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 82

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790955 AGRI21
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790956 AGRI23
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790957 AGRI31
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790899 AGRI14
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790964 AGRI6
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790919 AGRI32
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790958 AGRI12
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790954 AGRI13
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790917 AGRI18
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790916 AGRI14

Show all 82 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

  • Group Renew Europe Renew · Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism

National delegation

  • Delegation Denmark National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 1ffa0cf578d8 (3 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
3 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Asger CHRISTENSEN”. Member record. memberId 197558. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197558?page=67&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 3 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197558. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197558?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 1ffa0cf578d8 (3 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197558,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Asger CHRISTENSEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197558?page=67&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197558?page=67&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-03},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197558. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197558. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 1ffa0cf578d8 (3 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}