Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Proposal to reject the text

Phasing out Russian natural gas imports, improving monitoring of potential energy dependencies

Vote
Proposal to reject the text
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 17 Dec 2025
Result
102 for · 517 against · 27 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 December 2025, 12:24
More facts (5)
Position
vote 1 of 48 on the decision
Official label
A10-0195/2025 – Inese Vaidere, Ville Niinistö – Proposal for rejection – Am 2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0195
Dossier
2025/0180(COD)
Vote id
182887
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 102 for, 517 against, 27 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 16 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 32Abst. 8No vote 6 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 120Abst. 0No vote 16 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 8 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 172Abst. 0No vote 16 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 2Against 69Abst. 4No vote 4 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 61Against 3Abst. 13No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.69
ESNFor 20Against 2Abst. 1No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 19Against 4Abst. 1No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany030
Denmark010
Spain030
Finland030
France090
Greece040
Ireland030
Italy018
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Amendment 19 to paragraph 7 2023 and 2024 reports on GeorgiaAmendment107 for, 551 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 617 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 65 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineAmendment127 for, 473 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 569 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 63 to paragraph 46 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment122 for, 504 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 585 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Amendment 21 to paragraph 25 2023 and 2024 reports on GeorgiaAmendment106 for, 547 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 614 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 28 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment130 for, 505 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 606 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 18 to paragraph 5 2023 and 2024 reports on GeorgiaAmendment96 for, 546 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 610 voters
8 Jul 2025Proposal to vote on amendments The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter seasonProcedural126 for, 542 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 19 %r · shared0.91 610 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 1 2023 and 2024 reports on GeorgiaAmendment97 for, 547 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 602 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 26 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment123 for, 515 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 583 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 87 to Article 1 — part 2 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment112 for, 479 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 576 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 10 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182887
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Proposal to reject the text — Phasing out Russian natural gas imports, improving monitoring of potential energy dependencies”. Vote, 17 December 2025. votingId 182887, reference 2025/0180(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182887 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-17-182887,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to reject the text — Phasing out Russian natural gas imports, improving monitoring of potential energy dependencies}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182887}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182887},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182887, reference 2025/0180(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}