Skip to content

Member

Mieke ANDRIESE

Patriots · Netherlands

Group
Patriots PfE
Country
Netherlands
Roll-call participation
91.8 %ⓘ of 2 979 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
78.7 %ⓘ of 2 727 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 82.7 %
More facts (5)
National party
PVV Partij voor de Vrijheid
In office
Since 20 Nov 2025
Against clear line
266 of 2 145 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET, FEMM (substitute), LIBE (substitute)
Member id
130881
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

91.8 %

2 736 of 2 979 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 91.1 % (+0.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

78.7 %

2 145 of 2 727 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 82.7 % (−4.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

12.4 %

266 of 2 145 votes where their group had a clear line

112 opposite (for ↔ against), 106 abstained against the line, 48 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

8.7 %

237 of 2 736 votes cast

Participation 91.8 % — Patriots median 91.1 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Mieke ANDRIESE91.8 %
Patriots median91.1 %
Lowest in the group44.5 %
Highest in the group99.9 %
Members89
With majority line 78.7 % — Patriots median 82.7 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Mieke ANDRIESE78.7 %
Patriots median82.7 %
Lowest in the group72.5 %
Highest in the group92.9 %
Members89
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 2 979

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10 135 for, 471 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Abstained
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 7 to paragraph 10 — part 2 103 for, 500 against, 61 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 2 190 for, 454 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 33 to paragraph 2 196 for, 446 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 116 for, 489 against, 56 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Final votePassed 503 for, 57 against, 108 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Abstained
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 247, adding text after recital 22 224 for, 424 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 256, adding text after recital 12 362 for, 259 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 259 to recital 4 197 for, 454 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 244, adding text after recital 3 227 for, 299 against, 138 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 187 to Article 23 527 for, 121 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 178 to Article 22 529 for, 120 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 170 to Article 21 525 for, 123 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 250 to Article 16, after paragraph 2 141 for, 516 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 257 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 5 325 for, 284 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 164 450 for, 205 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 163 528 for, 123 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 162 494 for, 152 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 159 517 for, 127 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 158 492 for, 159 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Proposal to reject the text 44 for, 600 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 438 for, 37 against, 48 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Separate vote on recital H 455 for, 88 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 2 431 for, 110 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 1 472 for, 61 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 9 54 for, 483 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 9 86 for, 463 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Separate vote on paragraph 9 429 for, 76 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Abstained
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 7 — part 2 441 for, 94 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 7 — part 1 451 for, 43 against, 65 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Abstained
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 385 for, 97 against, 78 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 450 for, 93 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 77 219 for, 337 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 6 to paragraph 61 204 for, 359 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 5 to paragraph 46 227 for, 346 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 4 to paragraph 42 227 for, 348 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 3 to paragraph 8 196 for, 367 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 217 for, 365 against, 1 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 386 for, 184 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 6, adding text after recital G 189 for, 376 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 5, adding text after recital G 187 for, 377 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 4, adding text after recital F 181 for, 384 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 3, adding text after recital C 197 for, 378 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 1, adding text after recital B 200 for, 382 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 53 183 for, 388 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 49 170 for, 386 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Separate vote on paragraph 40 414 for, 152 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Separate vote on paragraph 39 411 for, 152 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 20 179 for, 396 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 18 199 for, 372 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 4 of 42 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Rachel BLOM PatriotsNetherlands99 % of 2 577 shared74 %
Marieke EHLERS PatriotsNetherlands99 % of 2 704 shared74 %
Auke ZIJLSTRA PatriotsNetherlands99 % of 2 593 shared74 %
Ton DIEPEVEEN PatriotsNetherlands99 % of 2 617 shared74 %
Sebastian KRUIS PatriotsNetherlands98 % of 2 379 shared74 %
Barbara BONTE PatriotsBelgium80 % of 2 725 shared74 %
Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE PatriotsBelgium80 % of 2 671 shared74 %
Vilis KRIŠTOPANS PatriotsLatvia80 % of 2 549 shared74 %
Hermann TERTSCH PatriotsSpain79 % of 1 560 shared74 %
Gerolf ANNEMANS PatriotsBelgium79 % of 2 214 shared74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance78 % of 2 539 shared68 %
René AUST ESNGermany77 % of 2 558 shared70 %
Nicolas BAY ECRFrance77 % of 2 642 shared68 %
Laurence TROCHU ECRFrance77 % of 2 688 shared68 %
Roberto VANNACCI changed group ESNItaly77 % of 2 096 shared68 %
Alexander JUNGBLUTH ESNGermany77 % of 2 722 shared70 %
Hans NEUHOFF ESNGermany77 % of 2 121 shared70 %
Arno BAUSEMER ESNGermany76 % of 2 629 shared70 %
Anja ARNDT ESNGermany76 % of 2 124 shared70 %
Marion MARÉCHAL ECRFrance76 % of 2 521 shared68 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeMember24 Nov 2025now
Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM CommitteeSubstitute21 Nov 2025now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute21 Nov 2025now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI SubcommitteeSubstitute21 Nov 2025now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationMember24 Nov 2025now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE DelegationSubstitute21 Nov 2025now

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET1 Sept 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurAFET1 Jul 2026
EU Gender Action Plan IV – priorities for gender equality and women’s rights in external actionShadow rapporteurFEMM1 Jul 2026
EU-Syria political relationsShadow rapporteurAFET18 May 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurAFET23 Apr 2026
EU enlargement strategyShadow rapporteurAFET2 Mar 2026
2025 Commission report on TürkiyeShadow rapporteurAFET9 Feb 2026
Recommendation for the Council, for the Commission and for the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the changing geopolitical situation in East Asia and the need for closer cooperation with like-minded partners in the regionShadow rapporteurAFET9 Feb 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionFEMM9 Feb 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET29 Jan 2026

Show all 13 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

7 contributions recorded; 2 on behalf of their group; 9 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
7 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Jun 20262025 Commission report on Türkiye (debate) on behalf of PatriotsSpeech · 2 minRead
19 May 2026Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly (debate) on behalf of PatriotsSpeech · 2 minRead
29 Apr 2026Commission interference in democratic process and elections (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
20 Jan 2026Brutal repression against protesters in Iran (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Dec 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) Speech · 2 minRead

Show all 7 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 41

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION political prisoners in Cuba, the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0409Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors—
31 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors—
22 Jul 2026EU support for the International Criminal Court (ICC) E-10-2026-003073Written question27 Aug 2026
22 Jul 2026NDICI-Global Europe’s contribution to regional normalisation between Israel and Arab states P-10-2026-003083Priority written question28 Aug 2026
16 Jul 2026Constitutional coup by Péter Magyar’s government E-10-2026-003035Written questionwith 42 co-authors11 Sept 2026
7 Jul 2026Developments in Romania as a precedent for halting further EU enlargement E-10-2026-002798Written question19 Aug 2026
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan B-10-2026-0349Motion for a resolutionwith 7 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026Exclusion of EU accession prospects for Armenia as a matter of principle E-10-2026-002467Written question28 Jul 2026
11 Jun 2026Instrumentalisation of migration flows and political coercion of Member States E-10-2026-002418Written questionwith 1 co-author16 Sept 2026
3 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the quality and timeliness of the European Commission’s replies to Members’ written questions B-10-2026-0271Motion for a resolutionwith 33 co-authors—

Show all 41 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 9

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 9 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political groups this term

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Mieke ANDRIESE”. Member record. memberId 130881. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/130881?page=51&seats=all&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/130881. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/130881?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-130881,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Mieke ANDRIESE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/130881?page=51&seats=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/130881?page=51&seats=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 130881. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/130881. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}