Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Decision

Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Australia

Effect
Rejected
Result
134 for · 350 against · 14 abstained roll call
Date
25 March 2026, 15:17
Kind
Agenda vote
More facts (4)
Margin
by a large majority
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Sitting
Wednesday 25 March 2026
Final vote
189875
More
Cite this page Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page
Votes on this decision
Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 134 for, 350 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Rejected by a large majority.

The agenda was left unchanged.

Backed by The Left, Patriots and ESN; opposed by Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 31Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 9Against 28Abst. 0No vote 16 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.64
S&DFor 1Against 85Abst. 0No vote 49 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 1Against 50Abst. 0No vote 26 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 1Against 145Abst. 1No vote 37 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 7Against 34Abst. 3No vote 37 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
PatriotsFor 56Against 3Abst. 8No vote 18 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
ESNFor 15Against 3Abst. 0No vote 9 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
No groupFor 13Against 2Abst. 2No vote 13 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 37

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria412130.56
Belgium79060.34
Bulgaria28070.70
Cyprus0213—
Czechia119010.33
Germany15591200.68
Denmark2607—
Estonia1501—
Spain3336180.68
Finland39030.63
France34151310.52
Greece210090.75
Croatia1605—
Hungary122070.79
Ireland1508—
Italy10370290.68
Lithuania1802—
Luxembourg0501—
Latvia0504—
Malta0303—
Netherlands821020.59
Poland7240220.66
Portugal111180.77
Romania2201100.80
Sweden115230.75
Slovenia0603—
Slovakia65040.32

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 498 members

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Australia Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Australia Roll call134 for, 350 against, 14 abstained Rejected

Text

The text voted on.

Parliament’s vote records link no text to this decision.

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 5 connections: Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-25/1
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Australia”. Decision, 25 March 2026. votingId 189875. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-25/1 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-25/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-decision-2026-03-25-1,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Australia}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-25/1}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-25/1},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 189875. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}