Decision

Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024

Effect: Rejected
Result: 233 for · 250 against · 76 abstained roll call
Date: 12 March 2026, 12:10–12:16
Kind: Resolution

More facts (9)

Margin: narrowly
Text: Report A-10-2026-0015
Dossier: 2025/2138(INI)
Source: Committee report by Bogdan Rzońca
Topics: EU institutions & Parliament Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes: 70 votes · 20 roll calls · 14 amendments
Requested by: The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call) · S&D (1 roll call) · EPP (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · ECR (2 split votes, 1 separate vote) · Patriots (1 roll call, 5 split votes, 1 separate vote) · ESN (1 roll call, 1 separate vote)
Sitting: Thursday 12 March 2026
Final vote: 186166

Margin: narrowly
Text: Report A-10-2026-0015
Dossier: 2025/2138(INI)
Source: Committee report by Bogdan Rzońca
Topics: EU institutions & Parliament Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes: 70 votes · 20 roll calls · 14 amendments
Requested by: The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call) · S&D (1 roll call) · EPP (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · ECR (2 split votes, 1 separate vote) · Patriots (1 roll call, 5 split votes, 1 separate vote) · ESN (1 roll call, 1 separate vote)
Sitting: Thursday 12 March 2026
Final vote: 186166

Cite this page Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Votes on this decision

Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Rejected narrowly.

Parliament rejected the text.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 14 amendments (1 adopted, 13 rejected) and 55 parts of the text voted on separately (21 adopted, 34 rejected).

Backed by EPP and Patriots; opposed by The Left, Greens, S&D and Renew; ECR and ESN mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 0	Against 35	Abst. 1	No vote 10 of 46	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.96
Greens	For 0	Against 43	Abst. 2	No vote 8 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.93
S&D	For 4	Against 105	Abst. 0	No vote 26 of 135	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.94
Renew	For 17	Against 42	Abst. 2	No vote 15 of 76	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.53
EPP	For 136	Against 1	Abst. 4	No vote 43 of 184	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.95
ECR	For 4	Against 18	Abst. 39	No vote 20 of 81	Majority line Abstained	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.46
Patriots	For 60	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 24 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
ESN	For 1	Against 1	Abst. 21	No vote 5 of 28	Majority line Abstained	Clear line Abstained	Cohesion 0.87
No group	For 11	Against 5	Abst. 7	No vote 8 of 31	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 33

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

The Left line Against · 1 abstained of 36 who voted
Abstained (1)
- Giorgos GEORGIOU Cyprus
Greens line Against · 2 abstained of 45 who voted
Abstained (2)
- Mārtiņš STAĶIS Latvia
- Virginijus SINKEVIČIUS Lithuania
S&D line Against · 4 voted for of 109 who voted
Voted for (4)
- Claudiu MANDA Romania
- Gabriela FIREA Romania
- Maria GRAPINI Romania
- Mihai TUDOSE Romania
Renew line Against · 17 voted for, 2 abstained of 61 who voted
Voted for (17)
- Anouk VAN BRUG Netherlands
- Asger CHRISTENSEN Denmark
- Bart GROOTHUIS Netherlands
- Charles GOERENS Luxembourg
- Christine SINGER Germany
- Ciaran MULLOOLY Ireland
- Elsi KATAINEN Finland
- Engin EROGLU Germany
- Jan-Christoph OETJEN Germany
- Jeannette BALJEU Netherlands
- Katri KULMUNI Finland
- Malik AZMANI Netherlands
- Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN Germany
- Moritz KÖRNER Germany
- Morten LØKKEGAARD Denmark
- Sigrid FRIIS Denmark
- Svenja HAHN Germany
Abstained (2)
- Gilles BOYER France
- Ivars IJABS Latvia
EPP line For · 1 voted against, 4 abstained of 141 who voted
Voted against (1)
- Sven SIMON Germany
Abstained (4)
- Andreas SCHWAB Germany
- Branko GRIMS Slovenia
- Manuela RIPA Germany
- Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN Finland
ESN line Abstained · 2 voted for or against of 23 who voted
Voted for or against (2)
- Milan UHRÍK Slovakia
- Petras GRAŽULIS Lithuania

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)

Members' votes by country. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
Country	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Cohesion
Austria	11	8	0	1	0.37
Belgium	6	8	1	7	0.30
Bulgaria	1	6	2	8	—
Cyprus	2	2	1	1	—
Czechia	13	2	5	1	0.47
Germany	30	31	20	14	0.07
Denmark	5	8	0	2	0.42
Estonia	2	4	0	1	—
Spain	18	21	2	19	0.27
Finland	5	9	1	0	0.40
France	23	26	5	27	0.22
Greece	8	6	0	7	0.36
Croatia	5	5	0	2	0.25
Hungary	4	0	1	16	—
Ireland	4	8	0	2	0.50
Italy	12	32	13	19	0.34
Lithuania	4	5	2	0	0.18
Luxembourg	4	2	0	0	—
Latvia	3	3	2	1	—
Malta	2	3	0	1	—
Netherlands	13	17	0	1	0.35
Poland	23	5	18	7	0.25
Portugal	8	12	0	1	0.40
Romania	15	7	1	10	0.48
Sweden	3	12	0	6	0.70
Slovenia	3	2	1	3	—
Slovakia	6	6	1	2	0.19

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 559 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. **Speeches**: how many times they took the floor. **Final vote**: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
Member	Group	Speeches	Spoke	Final vote
Katarina BARLEY Germany	S&D	Speeches2	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	Against
Bogdan RZOŃCA Poland	ECR	Speeches2	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	Abstained
Vytenis Povilas ANDRIUKAITIS Lithuania	S&D	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	Against
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI Poland	ECR	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group	Abstained
Alex AGIUS SALIBA Malta	S&D	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	Against
Gheorghe FALCĂ Romania	EPP	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group	For

Show the other 17 speakers

Debate speakers, continued
Member	Group	Speeches	Spoke	Final vote
Martin HOJSÍK Slovakia	Renew	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	Against
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN Finland	ECR	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	Against
Pál SZEKERES Hungary	Patriots	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group	For
Murielle LAURENT France	S&D	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group	Against
Nikos PAPPAS Greece	The Left	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group	Against
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE Netherlands	Renew	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	Against
Lukas SIEPER changed group Germany	Renew	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	Against
Sandra GÓMEZ LÓPEZ Spain	S&D	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	Against
Michał KOBOSKO Poland	Renew	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group	Against
Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO Spain	EPP	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	For
Marcin SYPNIEWSKI Poland	ESN	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group	Abstained
Isilda GOMES Portugal	S&D	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	Against
Cristina GUARDA Italy	Greens	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group	Against
Regina DOHERTY Ireland	EPP	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	For
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ Ireland	Renew	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	Against
Julien SANCHEZ France	Patriots	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	For
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR Spain	S&D	Speeches1	12 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	Against

All votes on this decision, 70

In voting order. **Result**: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result
1	Separate vote on paragraph 2	Show of hands	Rejected
2	Separate vote on paragraph 4	Show of hands	Rejected
3	Separate vote on paragraph 4	Show of hands	Rejected

Show the other 69 votesShow the other 67 votes

Votes on this decision, continued
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
2	Separate vote on paragraph 4	Show of hands	Rejected
3	Separate vote on paragraph 4	Show of hands	Rejected

Votes on this decision, continued
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
4	Separate vote on paragraph 5	Show of hands	Rejected
5	Separate vote on paragraph 6	Show of hands	Rejected
6	Separate vote on paragraph 6	Show of hands	Rejected
7	Separate vote on paragraph 6	Show of hands	Rejected
8	Separate vote on paragraph 7	Show of hands	Rejected
9	Separate vote on paragraph 8	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested bysplit: Patriots, ECR
10	Separate vote on paragraph 8	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots, ECR
11	Separate vote on paragraph 8	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots, ECR
12	Separate vote on paragraph 8	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots, ECR
13	Separate vote on paragraph 8	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots, ECR
14	Separate vote on paragraph 8	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots, ECR
15	Separate vote on paragraph 8	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots, ECR
16	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 8	Show of hands	Rejected
17	Separate vote on paragraph 9	Show of hands	Rejected
18	Separate vote on paragraph 10	Show of hands	Rejected
19	Separate vote on paragraph 10	Show of hands	Rejected
20	Separate vote on paragraph 11	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested bysplit: ECR
21	Separate vote on paragraph 11	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: ECR
22	Separate vote on paragraph 11	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: ECR
23	Amendments 15 + 36 (voted as one) to paragraph 12 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 12 – Am 15D= 36D=	Roll call	252 for, 300 against, 12 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Greens, The Left, Patriots
24	Paragraph 12 — part 1 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 12/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘environmental’, ‘to further green policies’, ‘distort the democratic process and undermine the legitimacy of EU decision-making’”	Roll call	313 for, 245 against, 8 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: S&D; split: EPP
25	Paragraph 12 — part 2 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 12/2 Part voted on: “environmental”	Roll call	172 for, 385 against, 3 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: S&D; split: EPP
26	Paragraph 12 — part 3 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 12/3 Part voted on: “to further green policies”	Roll call	174 for, 389 against, 3 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: S&D; split: EPP
27	Paragraph 12 — part 4 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 12/4 Part voted on: “distort the democratic process and undermine the legitimacy of EU decision-making”	Roll call	203 for, 352 against, 6 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: S&D; split: EPP
28	Separate vote on paragraph 13	Show of hands	Rejected
29	Amendment 31 to paragraph 13 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 13 – Am 31	Roll call	148 for, 382 against, 30 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
30	Amendment 24 to paragraph 14 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 14 – Am 24	Roll call	161 for, 392 against, 10 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ESN
31	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 15	Show of hands	Rejected
32	Amendment 37 to paragraph 16 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 16 – Am 37	Roll call	185 for, 364 against, 16 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
33	Amendment 17 to paragraph 16 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 16 – Am 17	Roll call	98 for, 453 against, 9 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Greens
34	Separate vote on paragraph 16	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested byseparate: ESN, ECR
35	Separate vote on paragraph 16	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested byseparate: ESN, ECR
36	Separate vote on paragraph 16	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested byseparate: ESN, ECR
37	Amendment 38 to paragraph 17 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 17 – Am 38	Roll call	155 for, 402 against, 8 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
38	Amendment 18 to paragraph 17 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 17 – Am 18	Roll call	182 for, 362 against, 19 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Greens
39	Amendment 26 to paragraph 17 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 17 – Am 26	Roll call	225 for, 325 against, 14 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots, EPP
40	Separate vote on paragraph 17 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 17	Roll call	290 for, 258 against, 15 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: S&D
41	Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 17 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – After § 17 – Am 39	Roll call	159 for, 391 against, 10 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
42	Separate vote on paragraph 18	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested byseparate: ECR
43	Separate vote on paragraph 18	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested byseparate: ECR
44	Separate vote on paragraph 18	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested byseparate: ECR
45	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 18	Show of hands	Rejected
46	Amendment 40 to paragraph 19 — part 1 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 19 – Am 40/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and to actively involve civil society organisations, experts and non-governmental organisations in the field of child protection in the process;’”	Roll call	291 for, 201 against, 73 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: The Left; split: Patriots
47	Amendment 40 to paragraph 19 — part 2 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 19 – Am 40/2 Part voted on: “those words”	Roll call	224 for, 329 against, 7 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left; split: Patriots
48	Separate vote on paragraph 20	Show of hands	Rejected
49	Separate vote on paragraph 20	Show of hands	Rejected
50	Separate vote on paragraph 20	Show of hands	Rejected
51	Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 21 A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – After § 21 – Am 41	Roll call	217 for, 332 against, 13 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
52	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 22	Show of hands	Rejected
53	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 27	Show of hands	Rejected
54	Amendment 22 to recital B A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – Recital B – Am 22	Roll call	168 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ESN
55	Recital C — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘whereas the work of the Ombudsman contributes to helping EU institutions become more efficient, effective, citizen-friendly and accountable, thereby increasing citizens’ trust in the European project; whereas, in the exercise of her mandate, the Ombudsman may have to address new phenomena that have significantly increased in recent times,’	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots
56	Recital C — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: ‘such as disinformation and malicious activities from third countries, aimed at undermining citizens’ trust in the EU;’	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots
57	Separate vote on recital Q	Show of hands	Rejected
58	Separate vote on recital R	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested byseparate: ECR
59	Separate vote on recital R	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested byseparate: ECR
60	Recital T — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “whereas the Ombudsman inquired into how the Commission decided on the composition of the EU Energy Platform Industry Advisory Group;”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots; separate: ECR
61	Recital T — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: ‘whereas the Ombudsman found the Commission’s explanations for excluding civil society representatives, even with observer status, from this Group unconvincing;’	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots; separate: ECR
62	Recital U — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘social and environmental’”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots; separate: ECR
63	Recital U — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots; separate: ECR
64	Separate vote on recital V	Show of hands	Rejected
65	Separate vote on recital W	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested byseparate: ECR, Patriots
66	Separate vote on recital W	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested byseparate: ECR, Patriots
67	Amendment 27 to recital AC A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – Recital AC – Am 27	Roll call	172 for, 363 against, 22 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
68	Separate vote on recital AC	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested byseparate: ECR
69	Separate vote on recital AC	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested byseparate: ECR
70	Final vote — text as a whole A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)	Roll call	233 for, 250 against, 76 abstained Rejected

Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens, S&D, EPP, Patriots, ESN · split votes by EPP, ECR (2), Patriots (5) · separate votes by ECR, Patriots, ESN.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0015

What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The European Parliament voted on a resolution concerning the annual report on the activities of the European Ombudsman in 2024.

Parliament rejected the text, meaning it did not adopt the resolution.

Read the text · Report a problem

The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament approves the European Ombudsman's 2024 annual report and supports her work on transparency, accountability, and citizens' rights in EU administration.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2138(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament rejected the text on 12 March 2026; no position was adopted.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier

Referred to committee · 10 July 2025 (done)
Committee work · Report adopted 28 January 2026 (done)
Tabled for plenary · 17 February 2026 (done)
Plenary vote · Rejected 12 March 2026 (done)
Parliament’s position · No text adopted (done)

Lead committee: PETI · Author: Bogdan RZOŃCA (ECR)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 5 connections: Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Decision Deforestation Regulation - list of countries presenting a low or high risk Objection to a Commission measure · motion for a resolution 9 Jul 2025 Objection passed
Decision Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements New EU law · report by Jörgen Warborn 13 Nov 2025 Passed
Decision Deforestation Regulation: provisions relating to the date of application New EU law 14 Nov 2024 Passed
Decision Application of the Treaty provisions related to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and the role of national parliaments in the EU legislative process Resolution · report by Marieke Ehlers 27 Nov 2025 Adopted
Decision Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 Resolution · report by Gheorghe Falcă 22 May 2025 Adopted

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-12/6
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-12
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024”. Decision, 12 March 2026. votingId 186166, document A-10-2026-0015, reference 2025/2138(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-12/6 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-12/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-decision-2026-03-12-6,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-12/6}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-12/6},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 186166, document A-10-2026-0015, reference 2025/2138(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}