Skip to content

Decision · Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act

Union framework for the national calculation of life-cycle global warming potential

Effect
Objection failed
Result
208 for · 414 against · 10 abstained roll call
Date
26 March 2026, 11:07
Kind
Objection to a Commission measure
More facts (10)
Margin
by a large majority
Counts are for
the objection
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Climate & environmentEnergy Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Requested by
Patriots (1 roll call)
Final vote
189598
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 208 for, 414 against, 10 abstained (roll call).

Objection failed by a large majority.

The objection failed — the Commission measure goes ahead.

Backed by ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 106Abst. 1No vote 27 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 2Against 65Abst. 0No vote 10 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 10Against 155Abst. 0No vote 19 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 72Against 0Abst. 2No vote 7 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 83Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 6Abst. 7No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 16

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria613010.53
Belgium516010.64
Bulgaria510020.50
Cyprus1401—
Czechia156000.57
Germany1766570.63
Denmark213000.80
Estonia1600—
Spain944070.75
Finland112020.88
France3834090.29
Greece313050.72
Croatia19020.85
Hungary1100101.00
Ireland0806—
Italy3334090.26
Lithuania2702—
Luxembourg1401—
Latvia3501—
Malta0501—
Netherlands719230.52
Poland2325050.28
Portugal216030.83
Romania623220.61
Sweden513030.58
Slovenia4401—
Slovakia75120.31

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 632 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches126 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote on the motion for a resolution B10-0178/2026 – Motion for a resolution Roll call208 for, 414 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots

Roll call requested by Patriots.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2026-0178

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The European Parliament voted to reject an objection to a Commission delegated regulation that sets a Union-wide method for calculating the life-cycle global warming potential of buildings.

The objection failed, so the Commission measure goes ahead as planned.

The Parliament calls on the Commission to submit a new, more limited delegated regulation by the third quarter of 2026.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament objects to the Commission delegated regulation amending Annex III to Directive (EU) 2024/1275 on calculating life-cycle global warming potential, arguing it exceeds delegated powers and burdens construction and housing.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/3044(DEA) · Scrutiny of a delegated act

Commission Delegated Regulation amending Annex III to Directive (EU) 2024/1275 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the Union framework for the national calculation of life-cycle global warming potential

Parliament rejected the objection on 26 March 2026 — the Commission measure goes ahead.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 17 December 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Rejected 26 March 2026 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · No text adopted (done)

Lead committee: ITRE

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 13 connections: Running issue: EU climate neutrality · Other decisions of the part-session on ITRE dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: EU climate neutrality

Other decisions of the part-session on ITRE dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on ITRE dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Union framework for the national calculation of life-cycle global warming potential”. Decision, 26 March 2026. votingId 189598, document B-10-2026-0178, reference 2025/3044(DEA). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-26/16 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-26/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-03-26-16,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Union framework for the national calculation of life-cycle global warming potential}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-26/16}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-26/16},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 189598, document B-10-2026-0178, reference 2025/3044(DEA). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}