Skip to content

Decision

Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application

Effect
Failed
Result
228 for · 311 against · 92 abstained roll call
Date
26 March 2026, 11:16–11:18
Kind
New EU law · 1st reading
More facts (9)
Margin
by a small majority
Source
Committee report by Birgit Sippel
Topics
Justice, rule of law & rights Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
10 votes · 10 roll calls · 8 amendments
Requested by
Greens (1 roll call) · S&D (1 roll call) · Renew (1 split vote) · EPP (1 roll call)
Final vote
189270
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 228 for, 311 against, 92 abstained (roll call).

Failed by a small majority.

Parliament rejected the proposal.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 8 amendments (3 adopted, 5 rejected) and 1 part of the text voted on separately (1 lapsed).

Backed by S&D, Renew and Patriots; opposed by The Left, Greens, EPP and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 4Against 33Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
GreensFor 3Against 33Abst. 11No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.55
S&DFor 95Against 8Abst. 2No vote 30 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
RenewFor 33Against 29Abst. 6No vote 9 of 77Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.23
EPPFor 22Against 137Abst. 5No vote 20 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
ECRFor 27Against 12Abst. 35No vote 7 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
PatriotsFor 40Against 19Abst. 24No vote 2 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.22
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 3No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
No groupFor 4Against 16Abst. 6No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 58

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria514010.61
Belgium117310.29
Bulgaria36260.32
Cyprus1401—
Czechia0111000.29
Germany12621290.58
Denmark411000.60
Estonia0700—
Spain2024970.18
Finland210120.65
France5217480.57
Greece79140.29
Croatia1704—
Hungary1001100.86
Ireland6305—
Italy19173280.21
Lithuania46010.40
Luxembourg1401—
Latvia2601—
Malta3201—
Netherlands522220.64
Poland3116150.47
Portugal713010.47
Romania1411620.18
Sweden89040.29
Slovenia0711—
Slovakia06720.31

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 631 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Tomas TOBÉ SwedenEPPSpeeches29 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Sophie WILMÈS BelgiumRenewSpeeches29 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Manon AUBRY FranceThe LeftSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Carlo FIDANZA ItalyECRSpeeches19 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches47 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Mary KHAN GermanyESNSpeeches17 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Birgit SIPPEL GermanyS&DSpeeches226 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Javier ZARZALEJOS SpainEPPSpeeches111 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against

All votes on this decision, 10

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 30, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 — part 1 A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 – Article 3 – § 1 – point a – Am 30/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the word: ‘known’”Roll call303 for, 314 against, 19 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, EPP; split: Renew
2Before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021 — part 1232 Before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 – Article 3 – § 1 – point a Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
3Amendment 34, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 – Article 3 – § 1 – point a – Am 34 Roll call307 for, 306 against, 24 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
Show the other 9 votesShow the other 7 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021 — part 1232 Before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 – Article 3 – § 1 – point a Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
3Amendment 34, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 – Article 3 – § 1 – point a – Am 34 Roll call307 for, 306 against, 24 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 35, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 – Article 3 – § 1 – point a – Am 35 Roll call210 for, 312 against, 114 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: EPP, Greens
5Amendment 36, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 – Article 3 – § 1 – point a – Am 36 Roll call325 for, 298 against, 13 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
6Amendment 33 to Article 1 A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Article 1 – § 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 – Article 10 – Am 33 Roll call125 for, 394 against, 115 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: EPP
7Amendment 31 to Article 1 A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Article 1 – § 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 – Article 10 – Am 31 Roll call304 for, 306 against, 28 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, EPP
8Amendment 29 to Article 1 A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Article 1 – § 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 – Article 10 – Am 29 Roll call344 for, 236 against, 54 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
9Amendment 32, adding text after recital 4 A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – After recital 4 – Am 32 Roll call247 for, 301 against, 80 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: EPP
10Final vote A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Commission proposal Roll call228 for, 311 against, 92 abstained Rejected

Roll calls requested by Greens, S&D, EPP · split votes by Renew.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0040

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The proposal sought to extend the period of application of Regulation (EU) 2021/1232, which concerns a temporary derogation from certain obligations under EU law.

Parliament rejected the proposal, meaning it will not proceed further in the legislative process.

Parliament calls on the Commission to withdraw its proposal and will forward its position to the Council, the Commission, and national parliaments.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament rejects the Commission proposal to extend Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 and calls on the Commission to withdraw it.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/0429(COD) · Ordinary legislative procedure

Amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 28 July 2026 and now EU law.

Show the 6 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 6 July 2026 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 2 March 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 3 March 2026 (done)
  4. Negotiations with the Council · Trilogue 16 March 2026 (done)
  5. Plenary vote · Rejected 9 July 2026 (done)
  6. Published as law · 28 July 2026 (done)

Lead committee: LIBE · Rapporteur: Birgit SIPPEL (S&D)

Other decisions on this dossier

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 9 connections: Other decisions on this dossier · Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Other decisions on this dossier

See all: Other decisions on this dossier

Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application”. Decision, 26 March 2026. votingId 189270, document A-10-2026-0040, reference 2025/0429(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-26/3 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-26/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-03-26-3,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-26/3}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-26/3},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 189270, document A-10-2026-0040, reference 2025/0429(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}