Member
Pasquale TRIDICO
The Left · Italy
Record
The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.
Roll-call participation ⓘ
91.9 %
5 476 of 5 956 roll calls while in office
The Left median: 88.5 % (+3.5 pts)
Chamber median: 90.3 %
With majority line ⓘ
90.4 %
4 940 of 5 465 votes where their group had a line
The Left median: 92.8 % (−2.4 pts)
99 opposite (for ↔ against), 254 abstained against the line, 8 voted for or against when the line was to abstain
Data as a table
| Figure | Participation |
|---|---|
| Pasquale TRIDICO | 91.9 % |
| The Left median | 88.5 % |
| Lowest in the group | 44.5 % |
| Highest in the group | 99.3 % |
| Members | 47 |
Data as a table
| Figure | With majority line |
|---|---|
| Pasquale TRIDICO | 90.4 % |
| The Left median | 92.8 % |
| Lowest in the group | 81.9 % |
| Highest in the group | 96.9 % |
| Members | 47 |
- Whole term, 5 956 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of The Left; no ranks.
- “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
- A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.
Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.
| Date | Decision and vote | Result | Position | Majority line |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Mar 2025 | The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 7 | 213 for, 436 against, 11 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 31 to paragraph 7 | 122 for, 450 against, 93 abstained | Position: Abstained ≠ group | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 6 | 173 for, 461 against, 29 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 5 | 247 for, 409 against, 7 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 29 to paragraph 5 | 115 for, 462 against, 91 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 | 235 for, 389 against, 40 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 4 | 96 for, 389 against, 174 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 1 | 205 for, 447 against, 13 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 419 for, 204 against, 46 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 1 | 135 for, 468 against, 70 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 1 | 234 for, 421 against, 8 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 8, adding text before paragraph 1 | 41 for, 506 against, 47 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 1, adding text after recital T | 78 for, 515 against, 87 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 32, adding text after recital P | 118 for, 526 against, 36 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 25, adding text after recital J | 365 for, 234 against, 79 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 24, adding text after recital E | 279 for, 301 against, 94 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 22, adding text after recital E | 106 for, 524 against, 49 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 99 to recital A | 494 for, 114 against, 70 abstained | Position: Abstained | Majority line: Abstained |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 74 | 61 for, 572 against, 41 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 74 | 190 for, 444 against, 44 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 19 to paragraph 74 | 181 for, 384 against, 112 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 73 — part 1 | 400 for, 216 against, 58 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 76 to paragraph 71 — part 2 | 217 for, 422 against, 29 abstained | Position: Abstained ≠ group | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 76 to paragraph 71 — part 1 | 267 for, 280 against, 119 abstained | Position: Against ≠ group | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 70 — part 2 | 363 for, 180 against, 126 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 70 — part 1 | 489 for, 127 against, 64 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 69 | 303 for, 316 against, 62 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 69 | 216 for, 438 against, 25 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 69 — part 3 | 305 for, 309 against, 53 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 69 — part 2 | 355 for, 155 against, 159 abstained | Position: Against ≠ group | Majority line: Abstained |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 69 — part 1 | 528 for, 75 against, 67 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Abstained |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 68 | 208 for, 400 against, 70 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 68 | 198 for, 459 against, 14 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Separate vote on paragraph 68 | 480 for, 130 against, 67 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 108 to paragraph 68 | 97 for, 517 against, 56 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 14 to paragraph 68 | 231 for, 390 against, 53 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: Abstained |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 85, adding text after paragraph 66 | 200 for, 425 against, 53 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 64 | 102 for, 528 against, 46 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 63 | 54 for, 569 against, 44 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 63 | 52 for, 566 against, 43 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 63 | 65 for, 571 against, 35 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 66 to paragraph 62 — part 2 | 227 for, 425 against, 21 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 66 to paragraph 62 — part 1 | 122 for, 502 against, 47 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 61 | 64 for, 514 against, 93 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Separate vote on paragraph 59 | 476 for, 184 against, 13 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 58 | 62 for, 588 against, 29 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 58 — part 4 | 467 for, 114 against, 77 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 58 — part 3 | 373 for, 279 against, 24 abstained | Position: Abstained ≠ group | Majority line: Against |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 62 to paragraph 58 | 258 for, 383 against, 35 abstained | Position: Abstained | Majority line: For |
| 12 Mar 2025 | White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 57 | 191 for, 445 against, 31 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: For |
Roll-call participation
One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.
"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
Data as a table
Voting neighbours
Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.
Work
Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.
Seats
| Body | Role | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO Committee | Substitute | 6 Jul 2026 | now |
| Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT Committee | Member | 19 Jul 2024 | now |
| Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON Committee | Member | 19 Jul 2024 | now |
| Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN Committee | Substitute | 19 Jul 2024 | now |
| Subcommittee on Tax MattersFISC Subcommittee | Chair | 23 Jul 2024 | now |
| Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation | Member | 19 Sept 2024 | now |
| Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly | Member | 19 Sept 2024 | now |
| Delegation to the Caribbean-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDCAB Parliamentary assembly | Substitute | 19 Sept 2024 | now |
| Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working group | Member | 19 Feb 2025 | now |
| Intergroup on Fighting against PovertyIG10-12 Intergroup / working group | Member | 3 Mar 2026 | now |
Dossiers
Topics they work on (model-assigned)
- Economy & single market 52
- EU budget & funds 43
- Foreign affairs 26
- Justice, rule of law & rights 23
- Jobs, social affairs & equality 21
- Climate & environment 20
- Defence & security 12
- Migration & asylum 12
- Digital, AI & data 11
- Transport & tourism 10
- Health 5
- Trade & customs 5
- Energy 3
- EU institutions & Parliament 3
- Agriculture, food & fisheries 1
Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.
In the chamber
Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.
30 contributions recorded; 8 on behalf of their group; 40 minutes of speaking time.
Questions and motions, 111
Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.
Amendments tabled in committee, 60
Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.
Connections
Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.
Political groups this term
- Group The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL) The Left · Left · democratic socialism, communism
National delegation
- Delegation Italy National delegation
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 9a1842b8e67c (7 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 7 October 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Pasquale TRIDICO”. Member record. memberId 257133. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257133?page=103&period=term&vscope=all (retrieved 7 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257133. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257133?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 9a1842b8e67c (7 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-257133,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Pasquale TRIDICO}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257133?page=103&period=term&vscope=all}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257133?page=103&period=term&vscope=all},
urldate = {2026-10-07},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Member record. memberId 257133. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257133. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 9a1842b8e67c (7 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}