Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Member

Erik KALIŇÁK

No group · Slovakia

Group
No group NI
Country
Slovakia
Roll-call participation
92.9 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
—ⓘ The non-attached have no group line.
More facts (5)
National party
SMER-SD SMER-Sociálna demokracia
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
—ⓘ The non-attached have no group line.
Committees
LIBE
Member id
257007
More
Cite this page EP profile (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.9 %

576 of 620 final votes while in office

Non-attached median: 89.2 %

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority lineⓘ

—

The non-attached have no group line.

Against clear lineⓘ

—

The non-attached have no group line.

Abstention ⓘ

19.1 %

110 of 576 votes cast

Participation 92.9 % — Non-attached median 89.2 %, 31 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 31 members of the Non-attached with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Erik KALIŇÁK92.9 %
Non-attached median89.2 %
Lowest in the group59.2 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members31
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other non-attached members; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.
  • The non-attached have no group line: loyalty and votes against a clear line are not computed.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votesAll roll calls
Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 36 205 for, 344 against, 17 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 36 202 for, 346 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 36 158 for, 398 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Separate vote on paragraph 35 551 for, 12 against, 5 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 36 to paragraph 22 208 for, 264 against, 94 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 35 to paragraph 21 205 for, 262 against, 96 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 34 to paragraph 18 198 for, 354 against, 14 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Paragraph 9 — part 2 306 for, 225 against, 38 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Paragraph 9 — part 1 422 for, 83 against, 66 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 30 to paragraph 9 158 for, 374 against, 36 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 29 to paragraph 8 191 for, 371 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 27 to paragraph 6 187 for, 380 against, 3 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 25 to paragraph 3 198 for, 366 against, 6 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Rights, support and protection of victims of crime Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 440 for, 49 against, 84 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026The cases of human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 469 for, 38 against, 62 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026The cases of human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia Amendment 1 to paragraph 6 87 for, 415 against, 65 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 480 for, 5 against, 83 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 3 to paragraph 7 296 for, 252 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 184 for, 348 against, 28 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 2 142 for, 380 against, 36 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 1 155 for, 382 against, 26 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 5 to paragraph 4 295 for, 189 against, 73 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 2 181 for, 338 against, 36 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 516 for, 14 against, 39 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 2, adding text after recital D 185 for, 371 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 1, adding text after recital D 184 for, 368 against, 14 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 8 to paragraph 12 106 for, 386 against, 77 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 7 to paragraph 12 165 for, 386 against, 18 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Paragraph 11 — part 2 435 for, 113 against, 23 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Paragraph 11 — part 1 502 for, 41 against, 28 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 180 for, 383 against, 5 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5 195 for, 355 against, 15 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 201 for, 347 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 178 for, 379 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 2 72 for, 459 against, 37 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 240 for, 312 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Periodic roadworthiness tests and technical roadside inspection (Roadworthiness package) Decision to open negotiations with the CouncilNegotiating mandate approved 369 for, 126 against, 84 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 on securitisation and a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation Decision to open negotiations with the CouncilNegotiating mandate approved 294 for, 194 against, 86 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
21 May 2026Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions as regards requirements for securitisation exposures Decision to open negotiations with the CouncilNegotiating mandate approved 294 for, 192 against, 90 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 347 for, 165 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Amendment 10, adding text after recital D 187 for, 440 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Amendment 1, adding text after recital C 201 for, 438 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Separate vote on citation 25 451 for, 145 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Separate vote on citation 11 464 for, 134 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Separate vote on citation 7 426 for, 192 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Separate vote on paragraph 21 465 for, 122 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Paragraph 19 — part 2 463 for, 151 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Paragraph 19 — part 1 572 for, 37 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Paragraph 15 — part 2 635 for, 4 against, 3 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: —
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Amendment 4 to paragraph 15 184 for, 454 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 4 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 202411
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 202466
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 202422
10 Oct 202411
22 Oct 202455
23 Oct 202422
24 Oct 202422
14 Nov 202455
26 Nov 202488
27 Nov 202477
28 Nov 202466
17 Dec 202466
18 Dec 202477
19 Dec 202455
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202511
23 Jan 202544
11 Feb 202544
12 Feb 202544
13 Feb 202522
11 Mar 202544
12 Mar 202577
13 Mar 202533
1 Apr 202577
2 Apr 202599
3 Apr 202555
6 May 202544
7 May 20252014
8 May 2025120
22 May 202560
17 Jun 202588
18 Jun 202577
19 Jun 202566
8 Jul 202588
9 Jul 20251414
10 Jul 202577
9 Sept 202566
10 Sept 20251515
11 Sept 202588
7 Oct 202544
8 Oct 20251010
9 Oct 20251010
21 Oct 202588
22 Oct 202566
23 Oct 202555
13 Nov 20251616
25 Nov 20251313
26 Nov 20251010
27 Nov 20251111
16 Dec 20251111
17 Dec 20251111
18 Dec 202566
20 Jan 202666
21 Jan 202688
22 Jan 202688
10 Feb 202688
11 Feb 20261010
12 Feb 202680
24 Feb 202611
10 Mar 202699
11 Mar 20261212
12 Mar 202666
26 Mar 20261313
28 Apr 20261414
29 Apr 20261717
30 Apr 20261110
19 May 202633
20 May 20261212
21 May 2026100
16 Jun 20261010
17 Jun 20261616
18 Jun 202677
7 Jul 20261515
8 Jul 20261515
9 Jul 202644
15 Sept 20261212
16 Sept 20261616
17 Sept 2026109

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within No group

No member meets the rule within the group.

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Judita LAŠŠÁKOVÁ No groupSlovakia89 % of 5 236 shared44 %
Monika BEŇOVÁ No groupSlovakia84 % of 4 443 shared44 %
Katarína ROTH NEVEĎALOVÁ No groupSlovakia82 % of 5 284 shared44 %
Ľuboš BLAHA No groupSlovakia79 % of 5 090 shared44 %
Kateřina KONEČNÁ No groupCzechia71 % of 4 885 shared44 %
Ondřej DOSTÁL No groupCzechia70 % of 4 997 shared44 %
Aldo PATRICIELLO PatriotsItaly65 % of 2 171 shared51 %
Galato ALEXANDRAKI ECRGreece65 % of 3 543 shared48 %
Fernand KARTHEISER changed group No groupLuxembourg64 % of 5 107 shared45 %
Emmanouil FRAGKOS ECRGreece63 % of 5 208 shared48 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with MercosurDMER DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assemblySubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202415 Sept 2026

Show all 5 seats

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

33 contributions recorded, 7 written statements; 30 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
7 Jul 2026Urgent measures to strengthen the competitiveness and safeguard quality jobs in the EU’s automotive sector (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026Commission interference in democratic process and elections (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
25 Mar 2026Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate) StatementRead
9 Mar 2026European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law-Making covering 2023 and 2024 (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
11 Feb 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
11 Feb 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Jan 2026Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
20 Jan 2026CFSP and CSDP (Article 36 TEU) (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Dec 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Dec 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 33 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 110

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
17 Sept 2026We have ended our dependence. Are we competitive yet? E-10-2026-003736Written questionwith 1 co-authorNot yet answered
17 Sept 2026Horizon Europe, or when science ends and a political project begins E-10-2026-003729Written questionNot yet answered
15 Sept 2026Cost-efficiency of remote reading of existing meters and heat cost allocators pursuant to Article 16(2) of Directive (EU) 2023/1791 E-10-2026-003683Written questionNot yet answered
15 Sept 2026Does Article 16 of Directive (EU) 2023/1791 require a specific remote reading technology? E-10-2026-003684Written questionNot yet answered
3 Sept 2026The Commission is reaching for household savings. Who will bear the losses when it channels them into political projects? E-10-2026-003486Written questionNot yet answered
3 Sept 2026Even Iceland has said ‘no’ to the EU. When a developed European country remains outside the EU, is there a problem in Brussels as well? E-10-2026-003491Written questionNot yet answered
3 Sept 2026Blank cheque first, details to follow. Why should the EU approve billions when it does not know what they will be spent on? E-10-2026-003490Written questionNot yet answered
3 Sept 2026Member States and businesses have to comply with increasingly stringent rules. When drafting those rules, however, the Commission itself abandons its own principles E-10-2026-003487Written questionNot yet answered
3 Sept 2026Latvia is asking for an additional EUR 7 billion. Will the cost of cutting ties with Russia be borne by the EU’s common budget? E-10-2026-003492Written questionNot yet answered
3 Sept 2026EUR 200 billion for Global Europe, EUR 100 billion for Ukraine. And at home, new levies on businesses and households E-10-2026-003489Written questionNot yet answered

Show all 110 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 55

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
17 Jul 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790898 AGRI2
17 Jul 2026Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agriculture AGRI-AM-791100 AGRI15
14 Jul 2026Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2025 PETI-AM-790995 PETI36
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790918 AGRI16
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790919 AGRI6
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790954 AGRI4
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790955 AGRI1
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790957 AGRI1
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790964 AGRI4
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790899 AGRI2

Show all 55 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Slovakia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257007?page=20&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Erik KALIŇÁK”. Member record. memberId 257007. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257007?page=20&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 28 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257007. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257007?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-member-257007,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Erik KALIŇÁK}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257007?page=20&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257007?page=20&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257007. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257007. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}