Skip to content

Member

Friedrich PÜRNER

No group · Germany

Group
No group NI
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
87.4 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
—ⓘ The non-attached have no group line.
More facts (5)
National party
Independent
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
—ⓘ The non-attached have no group line.
Committees
ECON, ENVI (substitute), SANT (substitute)
Member id
256969
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

87.4 %

542 of 620 final votes while in office

Non-attached median: 89.2 %

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority lineⓘ

—

The non-attached have no group line.

Against clear lineⓘ

—

The non-attached have no group line.

Abstention ⓘ

36.2 %

196 of 542 votes cast

Participation 87.4 % — Non-attached median 89.2 %, 31 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 31 members of the Non-attached with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Friedrich PÜRNER87.4 %
Non-attached median89.2 %
Lowest in the group59.2 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members31
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other non-attached members; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.
  • The non-attached have no group line: loyalty and votes against a clear line are not computed.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Paragraph 7 — part 2 437 for, 158 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 337 for, 246 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 456 for, 135 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Amendment 4 to paragraph 3 170 for, 396 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
23 Jan 2025Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 150 for, 448 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
23 Jan 2025Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 7 162 for, 312 against, 137 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
23 Jan 2025Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 272 for, 290 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
22 Jan 2025Need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in Belarus Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 567 for, 25 against, 66 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
22 Jan 2025Need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in Belarus Amendments 4 + 7 (voted as one) to paragraph 19 429 for, 205 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
21 Jan 2025EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Serbia Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 505 for, 90 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
20 Jan 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe The Left 196 for, 221 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
20 Jan 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PfE 108 for, 313 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 322 for, 163 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 1, adding text after recital K 197 for, 342 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on recital K 328 for, 143 against, 85 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on citation 14 310 for, 183 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 9 to paragraph 1, after point ar 170 for, 364 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on paragraph 1, point an 319 for, 183 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 5 364 for, 120 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 4 356 for, 157 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 3 328 for, 178 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 2 366 for, 116 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 1 492 for, 43 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 17 to paragraph 1, point al 154 for, 379 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 8 to paragraph 1, point ak 204 for, 355 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 7 to paragraph 1, after point ag 152 for, 383 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, point ag 210 for, 332 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 5 to paragraph 1, after point af 167 for, 384 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point af — part 2 271 for, 268 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point af — part 1 549 for, 14 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point ae — part 2 264 for, 292 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point ae — part 1 424 for, 141 against, 1 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point w — part 2 355 for, 177 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point w — part 1 395 for, 151 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 5 384 for, 158 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 382 for, 159 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 3 267 for, 297 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 276 for, 287 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 1 421 for, 89 against, 61 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point r — part 2 389 for, 153 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point r — part 1 551 for, 8 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point q 198 for, 359 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 3 to paragraph 1, after point q 202 for, 361 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 3 398 for, 142 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 2 362 for, 158 against, 47 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 400 for, 148 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 14 to paragraph 1, after point i 199 for, 318 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 12 to paragraph 1, point h 164 for, 398 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 2 to paragraph 1, after point a 169 for, 388 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point a — part 2 356 for, 172 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 7 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within No group

No member meets the rule within the group.

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jan-Peter WARNKE No groupGermany58 % of 4 761 shared44 %
Michael VON DER SCHULENBURG No groupGermany57 % of 4 473 shared44 %
Fabio DE MASI No groupGermany57 % of 4 948 shared44 %
Thomas GEISEL No groupGermany57 % of 4 321 shared44 %
Ruth FIRMENICH No groupGermany56 % of 5 029 shared44 %
Ondřej DOSTÁL No groupCzechia53 % of 4 611 shared44 %
Erik KALIŇÁK No groupSlovakia52 % of 4 622 shared44 %
Kateřina KONEČNÁ No groupCzechia52 % of 4 643 shared44 %
Judita LAŠŠÁKOVÁ No groupSlovakia52 % of 4 701 shared44 %
Fernand KARTHEISER changed group No groupLuxembourg51 % of 4 883 shared45 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeSubstitute20 Jan 2025now
Committee on Public HealthSANT CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with CanadaD-CA DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Pacific-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDPAC Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202419 Jan 2025

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

7 contributions recorded; 9 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
12 Mar 2026Prevention and treatment of obesity (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
26 Nov 2025Protecting citizens' right to make cash payments and ensuring financial inclusion (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Dec 2024Misinformation and disinformation on social media platforms, such as TikTok, and related risks to the integrity of elections in Europe (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
26 Nov 2024Prison conditions in the EU (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
25 Nov 2024Signature of acts adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (Rule 81) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Oct 2024Facing fake news, populism and disinformation in the EU - the importance of public broadcasting, media pluralism and independent journalism (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
18 Sept 2024EU response to the Mpox outbreak and the need for continuous action (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 7 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 72

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
2 Sept 2026Commission’s basis for publicly attributing the drone incident at Leipzig/Halle Airport to Russia E-10-2026-003464Written questionNot yet answered
2 Sept 2026Basis for the Vice-President / High Representative’s public statements on the drone incident at Leipzig/Halle Airport E-10-2026-003462Written questionNot yet answered
1 Sept 2026Evaluation of national committees of inquiry and transparency of EU pandemic policy E-10-2026-003422Written questionNot yet answered
5 Aug 2026Contradictory reports on the number of returns from Ceuta P-10-2026-003206Priority written question18 Sept 2026
28 Jul 2026Compatibility of lethal police operations with Article 2 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and investigation transparency standards E-10-2026-003153Written question21 Sept 2026
29 Jun 2026Apple Inc. statement that Siri AI won’t be available to EU users on iOS 27 and iPadOS 27 due to the Digital Markets Act E-10-2026-002687Written questionwith 3 co-authors2 Sept 2026
3 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the quality and timeliness of the European Commission’s replies to Members’ written questions B-10-2026-0271Motion for a resolutionwith 33 co-authors—
21 May 2026Liabilities of each participating Member State for the EUR 90 billion EU loan package for Ukraine E-10-2026-002108Written questionwith 12 co-authors16 Jul 2026
13 May 2026Spain – possible misappropriation of COVID aid E-10-2026-002000Written question8 Jul 2026
11 May 2026Costs in Case T-36/23 Stevi and The New York Times v Commission E-10-2026-001923Written question28 Jul 2026

Show all 72 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 9

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 9 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Friedrich PÜRNER”. Member record. memberId 256969. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256969?page=109&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256969. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256969?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256969,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Friedrich PÜRNER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256969?page=109&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256969?page=109&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256969. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256969. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}