Skip to content

Member

Alexander SELL

ESN · Germany

Group
ESN
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
92.1 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
98.8 %ⓘ of 571 votes where the group had a line · ESN median 93.9 %
More facts (5)
National party
AfD Alternative für Deutschland
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
4 of 549 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET, LIBE (substitute)
Member id
256959
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.1 %

571 of 620 final votes while in office

ESN median: 90.8 % (+1.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

98.8 %

564 of 571 votes where their group had a line

ESN median: 93.9 % (+4.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.7 %

4 of 549 votes where their group had a clear line

1 opposite (for ↔ against), 1 abstained against the line, 2 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

14.0 %

80 of 571 votes cast

Participation 92.1 % — ESN median 90.8 %, 27 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Alexander SELL92.1 %
ESN median90.8 %
Lowest in the group65.8 %
Highest in the group97.7 %
Members27
With majority line 98.8 % — ESN median 93.9 %, 27 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Alexander SELL98.8 %
ESN median93.9 %
Lowest in the group64.4 %
Highest in the group99.3 %
Members27
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of ESN; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 36 205 for, 344 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 36 202 for, 346 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 36 158 for, 398 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Separate vote on paragraph 35 551 for, 12 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 36 to paragraph 22 208 for, 264 against, 94 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 35 to paragraph 21 205 for, 262 against, 96 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 34 to paragraph 18 198 for, 354 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Paragraph 9 — part 2 306 for, 225 against, 38 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Paragraph 9 — part 1 422 for, 83 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 30 to paragraph 9 158 for, 374 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 29 to paragraph 8 191 for, 371 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 27 to paragraph 6 187 for, 380 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 25 to paragraph 3 198 for, 366 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Rights, support and protection of victims of crime Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 440 for, 49 against, 84 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The cases of human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 469 for, 38 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
21 May 2026The cases of human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia Amendment 1 to paragraph 6 87 for, 415 against, 65 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 480 for, 5 against, 83 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 3 to paragraph 7 296 for, 252 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 184 for, 348 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 2 142 for, 380 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 1 155 for, 382 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 5 to paragraph 4 295 for, 189 against, 73 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 2 181 for, 338 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 516 for, 14 against, 39 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 2, adding text after recital D 185 for, 371 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 1, adding text after recital D 184 for, 368 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 8 to paragraph 12 106 for, 386 against, 77 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 7 to paragraph 12 165 for, 386 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Paragraph 11 — part 2 435 for, 113 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Paragraph 11 — part 1 502 for, 41 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 180 for, 383 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5 195 for, 355 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 201 for, 347 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 178 for, 379 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 2 72 for, 459 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 240 for, 312 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Periodic roadworthiness tests and technical roadside inspection (Roadworthiness package) Decision to open negotiations with the CouncilNegotiating mandate approved 369 for, 126 against, 84 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 on securitisation and a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation Decision to open negotiations with the CouncilNegotiating mandate approved 294 for, 194 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions as regards requirements for securitisation exposures Decision to open negotiations with the CouncilNegotiating mandate approved 294 for, 192 against, 90 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 347 for, 165 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Amendment 10, adding text after recital D 187 for, 440 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Amendment 1, adding text after recital C 201 for, 438 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Separate vote on citation 25 451 for, 145 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Separate vote on citation 11 464 for, 134 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Separate vote on citation 7 426 for, 192 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Separate vote on paragraph 21 465 for, 122 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Paragraph 19 — part 2 463 for, 151 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Paragraph 19 — part 1 572 for, 37 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Paragraph 15 — part 2 635 for, 4 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Amendment 4 to paragraph 15 184 for, 454 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 7 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ESN

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Christine ANDERSON ESNGermany98 % of 5 150 shared80 %
Hans NEUHOFF ESNGermany98 % of 3 983 shared80 %
Irmhild BOSSDORF ESNGermany98 % of 5 226 shared80 %
Marc JONGEN ESNGermany98 % of 4 807 shared80 %
Anja ARNDT ESNGermany98 % of 4 675 shared80 %
Arno BAUSEMER ESNGermany98 % of 4 635 shared80 %
René AUST ESNGermany97 % of 4 977 shared80 %
Mary KHAN ESNGermany97 % of 4 942 shared80 %
Petr BYSTRON ESNGermany96 % of 4 655 shared80 %
Markus BUCHHEIT ESNGermany96 % of 4 928 shared80 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany97 % of 230 shared49 %
Georg MAYER PatriotsAustria77 % of 4 544 shared70 %
Gerald HAUSER PatriotsAustria77 % of 5 122 shared70 %
Petra STEGER PatriotsAustria77 % of 5 277 shared70 %
Roman HAIDER PatriotsAustria76 % of 5 412 shared70 %
Elisabeth DIERINGER PatriotsAustria76 % of 5 393 shared70 %
Mieke ANDRIESE PatriotsNetherlands76 % of 2 586 shared70 %
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group PatriotsPoland76 % of 1 284 shared70 %
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance76 % of 4 670 shared64 %
Milan MAZUREK changed group ESNSlovakia76 % of 450 shared49 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-CL Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now

Show all 5 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on EU engagement in the Horn of Africa – challenges and strategic prioritiesShadow rapporteurAFET17 Sept 2026
2025 Commission report on MoldovaShadow rapporteurAFET2 Jul 2026
Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement between the EU and MexicoOfficial delegationDLAT11 May 2026
Recommendation for the Council, for the Commission and for the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the changing geopolitical situation in East Asia and the need for closer cooperation with like-minded partners in the regionShadow rapporteurAFET15 Apr 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurAFET9 Apr 2026
Amending Decision (EU) 2021/1764 on the Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union including relations between the European Union on the one hand, and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark on the otherShadow rapporteur for an opinionAFET4 Mar 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionAFET6 Feb 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurAFET6 Feb 2026
Establishing Global EuropeShadow rapporteurAFET16 Dec 2025
Global Gateway -– past impacts and future orientationShadow rapporteurAFET10 Nov 2025

Show all 16 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

67 contributions recorded, 1 written statement; 32 on behalf of their group; 82 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
15 Sept 2026Hybrid attacks against the EU Member States (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Serbia (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 1 minRead
7 Jul 2026EU-Mexico (joint debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 2 minRead
6 Jul 2026Recent violent and fatal attacks in Italy and Denmark and their implications for public security in Europe (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 2 minRead
16 Jun 2026The role of the EU in efforts for peace and stability throughout the Middle East after the announced deal between the US and Iran (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 1 minRead
19 May 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 1 minRead
19 May 2026Europe's response to reduced US military deployments in Europe, particularly at its Eastern flank in the light of the latest US decisions (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
27 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU (debate) SpeechRead
27 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 43

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
31 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors—
12 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba B-10-2026-0288Motion for a resolution—
10 Apr 2026EU budget and equality policy – promoting LGBTQ projects over family policy E-10-2026-001469Written questionwith 22 co-authors30 Jun 2026
8 Apr 2026Union Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission Framework Regulation E-10-2026-001410Written questionwith 25 co-authors18 Jun 2026
30 Mar 2026Unlawful EU interference and the violation of Uruguay’s sovereignty P-10-2026-001313Priority written questionwith 4 co-authors29 Apr 2026
5 Mar 2026Anti-fascist movements and political violence – the real threat to democracy E-10-2026-000925Written questionwith 62 co-authors29 Apr 2026
9 Feb 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire B-10-2026-0140Motion for a resolutionwith 1 co-author—
28 Jan 2026Use of funds from European Union support programmes E-10-2026-000340Written question17 Mar 2026
22 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the power outage in Berlin and on the protection of critical national infrastructure B-10-2026-0097Motion for a resolutionwith 10 co-authors—
25 Nov 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine B-10-2025-0550Motion for a resolutionwith 1 co-author—

Show all 43 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 63

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 63 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Alexander SELL”. Member record. memberId 256959. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256959?page=20&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 28 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256959. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256959?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256959,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Alexander SELL}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256959?page=20&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256959?page=20&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256959. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256959. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}