Skip to content

Member

Sarah KNAFO

ESN · France

Group
ESN
Country
France
Roll-call participation
77.3 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
67.6 %ⓘ of 478 votes where the group had a line · ESN median 93.9 %
More facts (5)
National party
R Reconquête!
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
145 of 461 votesⓘ
Committees
ENVI (substitute), ITRE
Member id
256924
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

77.3 %

479 of 620 final votes while in office

ESN median: 90.8 % (−13.5 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

67.6 %

323 of 478 votes where their group had a line

ESN median: 93.9 % (−26.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

31.5 %

145 of 461 votes where their group had a clear line

53 opposite (for ↔ against), 53 abstained against the line, 39 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

16.3 %

78 of 479 votes cast

Participation 77.3 % — ESN median 90.8 %, 27 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Sarah KNAFO77.3 %
ESN median90.8 %
Lowest in the group65.8 %
Highest in the group97.7 %
Members27
With majority line 67.6 % — ESN median 93.9 %, 27 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Sarah KNAFO67.6 %
ESN median93.9 %
Lowest in the group64.4 %
Highest in the group99.3 %
Members27
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of ESN; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
28 Apr 2026Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024 Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 1 505 for, 109 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 447 for, 160 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Recital AP — part 2 336 for, 266 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Recital AP — part 1 497 for, 108 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Amendment 4, adding text after Recital AL 316 for, 298 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Recital AL — part 2 482 for, 83 against, 77 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Recital AL — part 1 571 for, 33 against, 48 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Recital AJ — part 2 394 for, 217 against, 29 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Recital AJ — part 1 468 for, 129 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Recital AC — part 2 325 for, 269 against, 49 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Recital AC — part 1 475 for, 109 against, 68 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Separate vote on citation 16 347 for, 257 against, 43 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 28 — part 2 459 for, 134 against, 46 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 28 — part 1 491 for, 111 against, 51 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 25 — part 2 361 for, 218 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 25 — part 1 518 for, 36 against, 100 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Abstained
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 21 — part 2 359 for, 218 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 21 — part 1 444 for, 152 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Amendment 6 to paragraph 21 312 for, 321 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 20 — part 2 335 for, 281 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 20 — part 1 431 for, 184 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 19 — part 2 369 for, 240 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 19 — part 1 504 for, 116 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 378 for, 213 against, 59 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 12 — part 3 491 for, 83 against, 63 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 12 — part 2 496 for, 94 against, 55 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 12 — part 1 578 for, 37 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 7 223 for, 343 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 4 — part 2 394 for, 227 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 4 — part 1 492 for, 126 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Amendment 2 179 for, 457 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Amendment 1 180 for, 455 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2024 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 377 for, 254 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2024 Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 37 156 for, 405 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Amendments to Parliament's Rules of Procedure concerning appointments to Union agencies and bodies (Rule 135) Final voteAdopted 657 for, 0 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Amendments to Biocidal Products Regulation as regards the extension of certain data protection periods Final votePassed 591 for, 54 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: workers affected by imminent job displacement Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 566 for, 67 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Final votePassed 459 for, 127 against, 70 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 558 for, 35 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Abstained
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Amendment 139, adding text after Recital 27 171 for, 465 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Amendments 125 + 129 (voted as one), adding text after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) 251 for, 334 against, 48 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Amendment 127, adding text after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) 169 for, 441 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Amendment 130, adding text after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) 188 for, 437 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Amendment 120 to Article 19, after paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) — part 3 502 for, 128 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) 95 for, 551 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Proposal to vote on amendments 412 for, 225 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Proposal to reject the text 39 for, 600 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 389 for, 191 against, 75 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III Amendment 66 to paragraph 63 164 for, 466 against, 17 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III Amendment 6 to paragraph 60 349 for, 264 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 22 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ESN

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Roberto VANNACCI changed group ESNItaly76 % of 1 593 shared80 %
René AUST ESNGermany76 % of 4 061 shared80 %
Hans NEUHOFF ESNGermany76 % of 3 281 shared80 %
Markus BUCHHEIT ESNGermany76 % of 4 003 shared80 %
Marc JONGEN ESNGermany76 % of 4 127 shared80 %
Alexander SELL ESNGermany75 % of 4 231 shared80 %
Anja ARNDT ESNGermany75 % of 4 250 shared80 %
Siegbert Frank DROESE ESNGermany75 % of 3 983 shared80 %
Christine ANDERSON ESNGermany75 % of 4 107 shared80 %
Irmhild BOSSDORF ESNGermany75 % of 4 254 shared80 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany84 % of 231 shared49 %
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance79 % of 3 772 shared64 %
Laurence TROCHU ECRFrance79 % of 4 260 shared64 %
Marion MARÉCHAL ECRFrance79 % of 3 741 shared64 %
Philippe OLIVIER PatriotsFrance79 % of 3 677 shared70 %
Catherine GRISET PatriotsFrance79 % of 4 219 shared70 %
Fabrice LEGGERI PatriotsFrance79 % of 4 181 shared70 %
Jean-Paul GARRAUD PatriotsFrance79 % of 4 145 shared70 %
Julien LEONARDELLI PatriotsFrance78 % of 4 132 shared70 %
Aleksandar NIKOLIC PatriotsFrance78 % of 4 085 shared70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeSubstitute20 Jan 2025now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union, including the EU-Morocco, EU-Tunisia and EU-Algeria Joint Parliamentary CommitteesDMAG DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the MediterraneanDMED Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Christians in the Middle EastIG10-07 Intergroup / working groupVice-chair20 Feb 2025now
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202419 Jan 2025

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Establishing a framework of measures for the acceleration of industrial capacity and decarbonisation in strategic sectors and amending Regulations (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2024/1735 and (EU) 2024/3110Shadow rapporteurITRE1 Jun 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards CO2 emission performance standards for new light duty vehicles and vehicle labelling and repealing Directive 1999/94/ECShadow rapporteur for an opinionITRE27 May 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationITRE3 Mar 2026
Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activitiesShadow rapporteurITRE4 Dec 2025
Safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the UnionShadow rapporteurITRE26 Sept 2025
European Technological Sovereignty and Digital InfrastructureRapporteurITRE21 Jan 2025
Rapport sur la souveraineté technologique européenneRapporteurITRE5 Dec 2024
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur · 2 declarationsITRE15 Nov 2024
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurITRE27 Sept 2024

Show all 9 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

27 contributions recorded; 18 on behalf of their group; 42 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
16 Sept 2026State of the Union (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026EU’s response and preparedness to protect people against recurring heatwaves and upcoming wildfires (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2026Protecting children’s safety and mental health from the risks posed by social media – our duty to act now (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 1 minRead
19 May 2026EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
18 May 2026Negative trade-related effects of global overcapacity on the Union steel market (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 2 minRead
29 Apr 2026EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
28 Apr 2026Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Jan 2026European Council meeting (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
15 Dec 2025Amending certain CAP Regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 2 minRead
25 Nov 2025European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’) (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 2 minRead

Show all 27 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 45

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
31 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors—
17 Jul 2026Adapting EU energy performance policies in the light of extreme heat episodes O-10-2026-000032Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
16 Jul 2026Traditional Speciality Guaranteed (TSG) ‘Fleur de Sel’ E-10-2026-003007Written questionwith 8 co-authors26 Aug 2026
15 Jun 2026Nuclear power and data centres E-10-2026-002448Written questionwith 13 co-authors4 Aug 2026
5 Mar 2026Anti-fascist movements and political violence – the real threat to democracy E-10-2026-000925Written questionwith 62 co-authors29 Apr 2026
26 Jan 2026Reporters Without Borders, a biased NGO heavily subsidised by Brussels O-10-2026-000003Oral questionwith 41 co-authorsNot yet answered
21 Jan 2026Repeated damage to places of worship and religious heritage in rural areas E-10-2026-000239Written questionwith 8 co-authors16 Mar 2026
14 Jan 2026MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2026-0063Motion for a resolutionwith 109 co-authors—
16 Dec 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on support for farmers affected by the lumpy skin disease epidemic B-10-2025-0594Motion for a resolution—
12 Dec 2025Gaziantep Islamic Science and Technology University scandal: can Erasmus+ money fund radicalisation? E-10-2025-004933Written questionwith 12 co-authors11 Mar 2026

Show all 45 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 47

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
10 Sept 2026on the proposal for a Regulations (EC) No 561/2006, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2019/2144 and (EU) 2024/1257 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the simplification of technical requirements and testing procedures for motor vehicles and repealing Council Directive 70/157/EEC and Regulation No 540/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council ITRE-AM-790812 ITRE9
18 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards CO2 emission performance standards for new light duty vehicles and vehicle labelling and repealing Directive 1999/94/EC ITRE-AM-790043 ITRE6
17 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards CO2 emission performance standards for new light duty vehicles and vehicle labelling and repealing Directive 1999/94/EC ITRE-AM-789960 ITRE14
5 Jun 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788898 ITRE4
27 May 2026Amending Directives (EU) 2018/2001, (EU) 2019/944, (EU) 2024/1788 as regards acceleration of permit-granting procedures ITRE-AM-788845 ITRE7
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788902 ITRE1
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788900 ITRE10
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788897 ITRE11
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788896 ITRE11
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788895 ITRE3

Show all 47 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Sarah KNAFO”. Member record. memberId 256924. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256924?page=31&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256924. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256924?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256924,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Sarah KNAFO}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256924?page=31&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256924?page=31&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256924. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256924. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}